Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

That shows the great influence of the Neocons on our government!
1 posted on 05/06/2003 9:12:12 AM PDT by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: philosofy123
already posted twice and pounded into a pulp here
2 posted on 05/06/2003 9:14:11 AM PDT by dirtboy (words in tagline are closer than they appear...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: philosofy123
"That shows the great influence of the Neocons on our government!"

Eh?
5 posted on 05/06/2003 9:33:50 AM PDT by adam_az
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: philosofy123
And Bill Bennett is the original leader of the Neocons, isn't he?

The only solution is to field real conservatives in the Republican primaries, and candidates won't step forward, as the tasks there are so daunting.
6 posted on 05/06/2003 10:24:15 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: philosofy123
Neocons?!! I don't think so.

The Republicans carefully considered seperating themselves from conservatism, and those who practice it. It was deemed a handicap & embarrassment (this is easy to do when 'principles' are a shameful shortcoming). This was done years ago.

From Senator Smith(R)
"As we moved into the 1996 elections, we again began to see this tug-of-war between the principal ideals of the party and the pragmatism of those who said we need `Republican' victories.

Conservatives became a problem: We have to keep the conservatives quiet; let's not antagonize the conservatives, while the pragmatists talked about how we must win more Republican seats. Conservatives should be grateful, we were told, because we were playing smart politics, we were broadening the case. Elect more Republicans to Congress, elect more Republicans to the Senate and win the White House. What do we get? Power. We are going to govern.

In meeting after meeting, conference after conference, the pollsters and the consultants--and I have been a part of all of this. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. I have been involved in it. I am not saying I have not, but the pollsters and consultants advised us not to debate the controversial issues. Ignore them. We can win elections if we do not talk about abortion and other controversial issues, even though past elections have proven that when we ignore our principles, we lose, and when we stick to our principles, we win. In spite of all this, we continued to listen to the pollsters and to the consultants who insisted day in and day out they were right.

To this day, I still hear "let's get 'em elected and give 'um a chance". Republicans are socialists, and prone to this behavior.

10 posted on 05/06/2003 12:04:53 PM PDT by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: philosofy123
Also remember that then Governor Bush strongly opposed the election of Ron Paul to Congress in 1996. He supported a primary opponent, whom Newt Gingrich had convinced to switch parties the year before.
11 posted on 05/06/2003 12:21:27 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: philosofy123
A "social Conservative" is a Liberal in who doesn't have the courage to admit it.

A Liberal is like a barrel of garbage and a Conservative is like a barrel of fine wine. If you take a cup of the wine and put it in the garbage, it's still garbage. If you take a cup of garbage and put it in the wine, the barrel of wine is now garbage.

Any person who claims they are part Conservative and part Liberal is all garbage.

13 posted on 05/06/2003 2:06:11 PM PDT by jimkress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson