Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Media AWOL in noting irony of Bush's flight (Bush's military Record BARF ALERT!)
Chicago Tribune ^ | 5/6/03 | Eric Zorn

Posted on 05/06/2003 1:41:31 PM PDT by areafiftyone

So much for that myth--the cynical distortion that has become conventional wisdom in many circles. During the presidential campaign of 2000, it started going around that Texas Gov. George W. Bush, then the leading Republican candidate, had significant gaps in his military record.

Specifically, that Bush failed to report for duty for an entire year toward the end of his hitch with the Texas Air National Guard.

The short version: In May 1968 the silver-spoon son of a U.S. congressman jumped to the top of a long waiting list despite mediocre scores on his pilot-aptitude test and was allowed to enlist in the Guard, a common way to avoid being drafted into combat in Vietnam.

In May 1972 he sought a transfer from Houston, where he flew F-102s on weekends, to a unit in Montgomery, Ala. There, he worked on the U.S. Senate campaign of a friend of his father's and, records indicate, blew off his military obligations.

Bush failed to take his annual flight physical in 1972 so Guard officials grounded him, the story went. He never flew again and received an early discharge to go to graduate school. His final officer-efficiency report from May 1973 noted only that supervisors hadn't seen him or heard from him.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
This is getting to be annoying! I am getting sick and tired of Democreeps saying Bush was AWOL!! Bush has to start nipping this in the bud! This started on DU and now the liberal anti-Bush media is picking this up!
1 posted on 05/06/2003 1:41:31 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
It is just SO amazing how so many liberal columnists all have the same basic theme to their anti-Bush columns today. I mean, I'm SURE it's all just a coincidence without ANY coordination from, say, the DNC! These are ALL just independent columnists making the same basic statements on their OWN!

RETCH **hork** urk urk urk urk

2 posted on 05/06/2003 1:44:03 PM PDT by dirtboy (words in tagline are closer than they appear...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
This phony story of Bush being AWOL has been floating around the DU for months before the war and now the liberal media has decided that this news is true and has decided to run away with it. The liberal media has just kissed an underground communist/socialst anti-american website's butt!!
3 posted on 05/06/2003 1:46:34 PM PDT by areafiftyone (The U.N. needs a good Flush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
not only that the same flacks & critics dismiss, out of hand, the likes of Howard Dean going skiing a month after being classified as unfit for the draft or, all the more unbelievable, love the likes of Bill Clinton, who not only burned his draft card, actually protested against the country on foreign soil. Talk about double standards!
4 posted on 05/06/2003 1:50:59 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
For all the facts, look at this: The Truth About "George W. Bush's Resume"
5 posted on 05/06/2003 1:57:37 PM PDT by Marylander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
AWOL is a tricky thing. Even if you didn't fill out leave paperwork, if the high mucky-muck above tells you you don't have to be somewhere, you're not going to get AWOL charges.

When I was in the Guard, I have seen people get out of training for things as frivolous as their high school prom. Sometimes they made up for it during the weeks following, or sometimes it just meant they wouldn't be paid for that month. I was let out of drill once or twice by the first E-6 above me - the Lieutenant, Captain, etc. above me never even knew I was gone (there's plenty of E-1s, you know!).

It's probably a bad thing, but if you talk to supervisors ahead of time and you are not a leader (as a new pilot Bush would not have been in a leadership position) it is not a big deal at all to get out of drill with a lot of units out there. So I don't think Bush gives the impression of being the most dedicated Guardsman ever, but (1) flying those jets at all was a lot more dangerous than anything Al Gore did in Vietnam; (2) the training period for learning to fly is a year to start -- longer than the 6 month "tour" Gore spent in 'Nam; (3) being a Guard member at all is a lot more than most citizens ever do in terms of serving the country.

6 posted on 05/06/2003 1:57:56 PM PDT by American Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Sure beats hauling a$$ to the USSR. HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM !
7 posted on 05/06/2003 1:58:14 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
These are ALL just independent columnists making the same basic statements on their OWN! - an amazing coincidence that seems to happen every day - I can't be sure but ya know what I'm beginning to think that they might ..just might be biased!
8 posted on 05/06/2003 2:00:02 PM PDT by Free_at_last_-2001 (is clinton in jail yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: ThomasMore
LOL! Love that pik!

You know Bush has scored when the lefties pull out an old chestnut like this!

10 posted on 05/06/2003 2:03:15 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Too bad for the media that military service in the presidency is judged on a bell curve. The Prez is looking even better next to the motley crew plus icky Hillary and her husband and their ex-puppet Gore. This non story still isn't going anywhere.
11 posted on 05/06/2003 2:08:12 PM PDT by RLJVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Poor ol' demonrats...if this fable didn't for the first 66 times, maybe number 67 will. What a bunch of bitter, green-eyed, whiny, blood-sucking insects.
12 posted on 05/06/2003 2:08:23 PM PDT by E=MC<sup>2</sup>
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free_at_last_-2001
These are ALL just independent columnists making the same basic statements on their OWN! - an amazing coincidence that seems to happen every day

One word: Gravitas.

13 posted on 05/06/2003 2:09:15 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
This phoney 'AWOL' issue regarding President Bush's last year in the National Guard is indeed old and tiresome. As I've read it, George W. Bush apparently did not attend Guard meetings for about a year but made up the time later in another unit and was honorably discharged. It was 30 years ago, Al Gore's 'Viet Nam' service was woefully lame and well-protected despite his claims of front-line bravery and the Dems didn't get much mileage out of this 'story' in 2000.
Add to that, since the Democrat party twice nominated (and defended to the death) an admitted draft dodger, Bill Clinton, their attacks on Bush's service record rang rather hollow to most. They still do.

President Bush has long since proved himself a leader, both politically and as Commander-in-Chief and his popularity with the military is clear and unmistakable, as we saw last week. Liberal columnists attempts to revive the 'AWOL' issue won't resonate with the public because it's not only factually incorrect but much more importantly, irrelevant to most Americans. When Democrats poo-pooed Clintons draft evasion they made themselves vulnerable when attacking Bush's admittedly thin service record and so, the attack goes nowhere. This is simply DU stuff that gives some liberals wet pants but bores everyone else. President Bush is well established as a leader and the Dems are very likely toast in 2004. This kind of wishful-thinking attack from the left will always be stillborn - and rightfully so.

14 posted on 05/06/2003 2:10:08 PM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Soldier
This is a technicality of course, but doesn't AWOL only refer to Federal Service. I was told by a National Guard member that unless your unit is called to Federal duty (I don't believe President Bushs unit was) that there is no such thing as AWOL.That doesn't mean that there aren't consequences, just that he wasn't technically AWOL

I also question why they never state he was given an Honorable Discharge. And wasn't his type of plane out of commision by the time this gap in service happened?

It seems to me (and yes I am making excuses for our President) that the people in the Guards probably had nothing for him to do and so looked the other way.

15 posted on 05/06/2003 2:11:24 PM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Saying he was AWOL means they recognize he was in the Texas air national guard.
Clinton was a total military dodger all the way down to begging for a deferment.
16 posted on 05/06/2003 2:31:45 PM PDT by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Well, I guess this decides it. I guess he is not a great commander in chief. We didn't kick butt in Iraq. Wow, maybe he should be impeached. :) The RATS are pinning their hopes on this non-issue. We have seen what troops have thought of our commander in chief and the phony of theirs who loathed the military. The poor, poor RATS. This might be causing them ulcers or a vein might pop in their heads. Wouldn't that be terrible?
17 posted on 05/06/2003 2:44:15 PM PDT by doug from upland (my dogs ran from the room when they heard Hillary shrieking on the radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Four months before enlisting, Bush reported at Westover Air Force Base in Massachusetts to take the Air Force Officers Qualification Test. While scoring 25 percent for pilot aptitude – "about as low as you could get and be accepted," according to Martin – and 50 percent for navigator aptitude in his initial testing, he scored 95 percent on questions designed to reflect "officer quality," compared with a current-day average of 88 percent.

Among the questions Bush had to answer on his application forms was whether he wanted to go overseas. Bush checked the box that said: "do not volunteer."

Bush said in an interview that he did not recall checking the box. Two weeks later, his office provided a statement from a former, state-level Air Guard personnel officer, asserting that since Bush "was applying for a specific position with the 147th Fighter Group, it would have been inappropriate for him to have volunteered for an overseas assignment and he probably was so advised by the military personnel clerk assisting him in completing the form."

During a second interview, Bush himself raised the issue. "Had my unit been called up, I'd have gone . . . to Vietnam," Bush said. "I was prepared to go." But there was no chance Bush's unit would be ordered overseas. Bush says that toward the end of his training in 1970, he tried to volunteer for overseas duty, asking a commander to put his name on the list for a "Palace Alert" program, which dispatched qualified F-102 pilots in the Guard to the Europe and the Far East, occasionally to Vietnam, on three- to six-month assignments.

He was turned down on the spot. "I did [ask] – and I was told, 'You're not going,' " Bush said. Only pilots with extensive flying time – at the outset, 1,000 hours were required – were sent overseas under the voluntary program. The Air Force, moreover, was retiring the aging F-102s and had ordered all overseas F-102 units closed down as of June 30, 1970.

After basic training at Lackland and his commissioning as a second lieutenant in 1968, Bush got what amounted to a two-month-plus vacation that enabled him to head to Florida to work for a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate, Edward J. Gurney. Put on inactive duty status, Bush arrived in early September and stayed through Election Day, riding the press plane, handing out releases, and making sure traveling reporters woke up in time. He occasionally returned to Houston for weekend Guard duty.

Bush graduated from Combat Crew Training School on June 23, 1970, having fulfilled his two years of active duty. But he still flew the F-102 Delta Daggers a few times a month; his unit kept two of the fighters, fully armed, on round-the-clock alert and needed the pilots to man them.

To start at Harvard, Bush needed early release from Guard duty in Texas, and he got it easily, about eight months short of a full six years. A Bush spokesman, Dan Bartlett, said early departures were quite common and, in Bush's case, appropriate because his unit had phased out the F-102s.

Source

18 posted on 05/06/2003 2:45:40 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Don't ever forget Clinton LOATHED the US military!!!!
19 posted on 05/06/2003 2:46:22 PM PDT by just me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson