Skip to comments.
MAILER BLASTS BACK AT COMIC
NY Post: Page Six ^
| Richard Johnson
Posted on 05/09/2003 7:56:06 AM PDT by Pharmboy
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:13:47 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
May 9, 2003 -- DON'T invite Dennis Miller and Norman Mailer to the same party.
Miller trashed Mailer in a May 5 op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal for the novelist's arguments against President Bush's liberation of Iraq. And now Mailer has responded with a "Dear Dennis" letter, published in the Journal yesterday.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: dennismiller; mailer; miller; traitors; vidal; vonnegut
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-96 next last
Surprised the Jew-hating Vidal would be in the same room with Mailer; I guess their combined hatred for the US trumps the other stuff.
1
posted on
05/09/2003 7:56:06 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
To: Pharmboy
I am surprised homosexual Mailer isn't an editor at antiwar.com. Birds of a feather, and all that...
To: Pharmboy
Miller retorted in the Journal that Mailer, like designer Mary Quant, was "kinda hot for a few minutes in the '60s . . . ow ow ow ow OW! That's gotta hurt :-))
3
posted on
05/09/2003 8:01:01 AM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: Pharmboy
Mailer may have drawn some comfort yesterday from two fellow World War II veterans - Kurt Vonnegut and Gore Vidal.
The death of American letters, these three.
4
posted on
05/09/2003 8:01:22 AM PDT
by
Asclepius
(as above, so below)
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Vidal is gay; I don't think Mailer is.
5
posted on
05/09/2003 8:06:45 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Dems lie 'cause they have to)
To: Pharmboy
Miller was funny. Mailer is vitriolic. Classic liberal response.
6
posted on
05/09/2003 8:06:54 AM PDT
by
KeyWest
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Um, do you really think Mailer is gay?? As someone who once saw him doing the Frug with a fashion model at an Upper Eastside party, I can assure you he's a jerk but not gay.
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Birds of a feather.....Hmmm.....sounds like your speaking from personal experience. It takes one to know one eh?
To: Pharmboy
good piece giving a lot of Miller quotes, but where is anything of a retort from Mailer? Face it, it's an unfair fight!! ;-)
9
posted on
05/09/2003 8:08:37 AM PDT
by
AgThorn
(Continue to pray for our Troops!!)
To: Pharmboy
I think that Dennis will be further eviscerating the scum in public. This could be fun to watch. Dennis has to watch out that Mailer doesn't stab him, as he did to one of his wives, or help get another murderer out of prison so he can murder again. Mailer is totally morally bankrupt.
10
posted on
05/09/2003 8:11:37 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(my dogs ran from the room when they heard Hillary shrieking on the radio)
To: miss marmelstein
And that means he isn't homosexual?
I would guess he's mysogynist to the bones.
He stabbed one wife in the breast, for G-d's sake. Talk about symbolic.
To: Pharmboy
Mailer may have drawn some comfort yesterday from two fellow World War II veterans - Kurt Vonnegut and Gore Vidal. Lest I become overly sentimental for the WWII generation.
You can add Studs Turkel & Walt Cronkite to this list.
12
posted on
05/09/2003 8:13:31 AM PDT
by
skeeter
(Fac ut vivas)
To: Pharmboy
Just about everyone in their 80's is a WWII veteran. That doesn't get you any mileage with me.
Mailer, Vidal et al are a bunch of self-absorbed, elitist, America-hating Euro-weenie-wannabe parasites.
13
posted on
05/09/2003 8:13:35 AM PDT
by
keithtoo
(!)
To: Austin Willard Wright
Yes, you're correct. Birds of a feather in my life as well. I tend to hang around with Pro-American, Pro-Bush supporters who have their hearts set on liberating an oppressed people, and seeing an end to terrorist attacks on American soil.
Know any people like this?
To: mabelkitty
Rock Hudson. Sean Connery...
Don't worry, these people go by outward appearances.
To: Pharmboy
Norman Mailer, Kurt Vonnegut and Gore Vidal.
Whole lotta cranky in that room.
16
posted on
05/09/2003 8:16:34 AM PDT
by
dead
To: Pharmboy
Mailer is projecting his own insecurities on the rest of us. It must suck to be him.
To: Pharmboy
Good Lord - Vonnegut, Mailer and Vidal? Geriatric ex-trendoids whose talent is decades past its "sell-by" date. Love to have the Metamucil concession at that party.
Vonnegut, at least, has not fallen prey to the grotesque attempts on the part of the other two to project a macho image more appropriate to men fifty years younger and fifty IQ points lower. But all three seem blissfully unaware that the verities they have spent careers propounding as received truths are no longer the basis for a world-changing philosophy; that they have borne fruit and that fruit is rotten. Romantic youth overturning the ossified social structures of their elders ended up in the killing fields of Pol Pot and the literary and artistic holocaust of the Cultural Revolution. Anti-fascism enthusiasms ended up supporting despots. Anti-imperialistic passions ended up supporting communistic empires. Anti-militaristic slogans ended up in the massacre of Tiananmen Square and the brutal blitzkrieg that led to the final takeover of South Vietnam by the North. Brick by brick, piece by piece, each of the high-sounding nostrums promulgated by these three has been exposed for the sham that it is.
The stridency we now hear from these fading icons is that of failure and irrelevance, and that is precisely what Miller pointed out with respect to Mailer. They have retained their ideals untarnished by the horrors that the unrestricted applications of those ideals caused in the real world. It is sad that they think this to be laudable.
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Is this the same Norman Mailer that helped a convicted murderer in prison write a novel and eventually gain his release? This guy is a suspected psychopath who killed a NY waiter shortly after parole with a knife because he was asked to leave.
19
posted on
05/09/2003 8:18:12 AM PDT
by
John123
To: mabelkitty
"He stabbed one wife in the breast, for G-d's sake. Talk about symbolic. "I suppose I'd have to see the breast.
20
posted on
05/09/2003 8:19:28 AM PDT
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: John123
Maybe Mailer is only havng a bad hair day. Apparently some members of FR support this pacifist.
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Pro-British? Tory!
To: Billthedrill
Denial ain't a river in Egypt.
To: Pharmboy
Mailer is merely a garrulous lunatic.
To: Pharmboy
Vidal is a communist like his cousin Al Gore.
25
posted on
05/09/2003 8:28:36 AM PDT
by
cynicom
To: Billthedrill; Admin Moderator
Way to go, Bill!
I hereby nominate your mini-rant for Quote of the Week.
26
posted on
05/09/2003 8:28:59 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Dems lie 'cause they have to)
To: sheik yerbouty
"Full of trivial conversation"....lol.
To: Pharmboy
The fun started with Mailer's recent op-ed piece in the London Times, "Why Are We in Iraq," in which he asserted that Operation Iraqi Freedom was a way to massage the white male ego. First the liberals were complaining that the blacks are over-represented in the Armed Forces and we were sending them off to die. Now that we've won with an impressive military display, all of a sudden the military is predominantly white.
I saw all races in all branches and at all levels and was impressed by how well they worked together. One story in particular told of how the native Iraqis were confused by the Melting Pot of ethnicity of the American soldiers, yet they all called themselves Americans - no hyphens needed.
To: sheik yerbouty
...who stabbed his wife and freed a prisoner who subsequently stabbed a waiter to death (Jack Henry Abbott). Mailer is definitely capable of doing bad stuff...as a matter of fact, he thrives on it, the sicko.
29
posted on
05/09/2003 8:31:42 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Dems lie 'cause they have to)
To: Pharmboy
Mailer may have drawn some comfort yesterday from two fellow World War II veterans - Kurt Vonnegut and Gore Vidal. Talk about literary irrelevance! I haven't read a Vonnegut novel in years, and I only really think about Slaughterhouse Five when I'm pensive about the nature of Western war.
I refuse to read Vidal, and Mailer has been passe for decades.
Whereas Dennis Miller is something like a modern oral version of some of Clemens' better stuff.
To: an amused spectator
Even though I can't stand the old queen, Burr was entertaining.
31
posted on
05/09/2003 8:33:56 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Dems lie 'cause they have to)
To: Asclepius
The death of American letters, these three. They ain't gonna make into the Classics, that's for sure.
To: Pharmboy
Mailer, Vonnegut and Gore...Irrelevance x 3
33
posted on
05/09/2003 8:36:25 AM PDT
by
Hildy
To: keithtoo
Just about everyone in their 80's is a WWII veteran. That doesn't get you any mileage with me. Mailer has written a few dozen distinguished books, and has won two Pulitzer Prizes and the National Book Award. Mailer also served in an actual war, as one recent web biography describes: "Mailer was inducted into the Army in March 1944, less than a year after graduating with honors from Harvard with a B.S. in Engineering. His experience in the Army as a surveyor in the field artillery, an intelligence clerk in the cavalry and a rifleman with a reconnaissance platoon in the Philippine mountains, gave him the idea for a novel about World War II."
Gore Vidal grew accustomed at an early age to a life among political and social notables. He was born at the military academy in West Point, New York, where his father was an instructor. He was raised near Washington, DC, in the house of his grandfather, Thomas P. Gore, a populist Democrat senator from Oklahoma. Vidal learned about political life from him and when he was a teenager he adopted the first name of Gore. Vidal also spent time on the Virginia estate of his stepfather, Hugh. D. Auchincloss. After graduating from Philips Exeter Academy in New Hampshire, he served on an army supply ship in the Aleutian Islands, near Alaska.
34
posted on
05/09/2003 8:36:31 AM PDT
by
kabar
To: Billthedrill
"Love to have the metamucil concession at that party!" Email that to Miller..that's great!
35
posted on
05/09/2003 8:37:34 AM PDT
by
Hildy
To: AgThorn
Two quotes from Mailer, four quotes from Miller.
Perhaps Johnson had difficulty finding any more interesting zingers from Mailer's cow spew.
I know I'm not going to waste my time on it. ;-)
To: Billthedrill
"Geriatric ex-trendoids whose talent is decades past its "sell-by" date."
Now that's a good line - wish I'd thought of it.
To: Pharmboy; Billthedrill; Admin Moderator
I'll second the motion. ;-)
To: Pharmboy
It's almost sad to see these aging Democrats lose their dignity. Almost, but not quite.
39
posted on
05/09/2003 8:43:41 AM PDT
by
Consort
To: Pharmboy
From the Dixie Chicks to Mailer to Madonna, what I find offensive about these people is the way they present themselves to Europeans as not being like all those "other" Americans, all the dumb, ignorant, racist Americans who voted for Bush. That is why I see no "courage" in any of these celebrities' comments - they are simply pandering to a foreign audience that they know will applaud them - what's so f***ing courageous about that?
To: Steve_Seattle
Still like Vonnegut.
To: kabar
Such a pity... I was a great admirer of Vonnegut in my liberal teenage years. However, the more I read his books, the more I began to view them as simply novel-length rants-- with Breakfast of Champions being exhibit A.
A few of his books, like Player Piano, Cat's Cradle and Galapagos raise interesting philosophical points, although something like Player Piano is certainly an obsolete philosophical point in the wake of the tech revolution in this country (there aren't fewer jobs with automation... there's more).
All in all, when a liberal writer like this makes 'predictions' he gets it wrong from the start. All the hellish 'utopias' predicted by liberal writers in the 60's come with a centralized 'overseer' running it. Writing about this, you'd think they'd be against a centralized state, especially when viewing how all their predictions for the 'bad' future come true on the causative end, but bear fruit on the effects end simply because the wide scope of American experience and ingenuity can make a buck off anything.
42
posted on
05/09/2003 8:50:20 AM PDT
by
Goodlife
To: Billthedrill
More and more, I see the liberal/conservative rift as a conflict between the romantic and the classical temperaments. The romantic idealizes nature, the individual, emotion, spontaneity, and extravagence, whereas the classical temperament favors reason, moderation, proportion, and the rule of law. But ironically, when the romantic temperament gains political power, it uses a legalistic iron fist to impose its way and to crush individuality.
To: Steve_Seattle
Natalie Maines did the same thing - made a cheap shot in England to please her audience, to get applause, to make sure she would stand apart and be free of association from Bush or "those other Americans", so she could get audience approval.
44
posted on
05/09/2003 9:01:46 AM PDT
by
SarahW
To: kabar
I wouldn't say that Mailer has written "a few dozen distinguished books." I'd say he's written two or three good books, including "The Naked and the Dead" and "Armies of the Night"; a few dozen forgetable, second- and third-rate books, and one of the worst novels of the 20th century: "Ancient Egypt."
45
posted on
05/09/2003 9:12:04 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: mabelkitty
I've read most of his books (including his picture book on Marilyn Monroe which is really beautiful-looking)and I say he has a very heterosexual point of view. He's not unlike Hemingway who is also predictably called gay on the basis of nothing except that, like Mailer, he enjoyed punching other men at parties. Not all men who hurt women are gay; that's a cliche.
I can't believe I'm defending old Normie!
To: Pharmboy
Even though I can't stand the old queen, Burr was entertaining. I've seen it, but it never piqued my interest.
To: Billthedrill
Excellent Rant!! Congrats, you nailed it.
To: Pharmboy
Mailer and Vidal are examples of the New York elite that Algore ascribes and the clintoons suck up to? Yuck!
To: Billthedrill
Thanks for posting those comments, you exceed simple
invective.
I just finished a book by Jacques Barzun, named "From
Dawn To Decadence". Your comments reminded me of some
his his observations of the last century.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson