Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China censors CNN SARS report
CNN.com ^ | May 14, 2003 | Jaime FlorCruz

Posted on 05/14/2003 8:16:57 PM PDT by EternalHope

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:02:32 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

BEIJING, China (CNN) --Chinese censors Tuesday blocked the airing of a CNN International interview that criticized the government's handling of the SARS epidemic, despite a government pledge to be more open with information.

The seven-minute segment was part of the 30-minute "Insight" program. In it, Newsday reporter Laurie Garrett, author of "The Coming Plague," commented on the decrepit state of China's public health system, and accused the government of ordering doctors to underreport the number of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome.


(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; cnn; lauriegarrett; sars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
China has ordered doctors to underreport the number of patients with SARS?

I am Shocked! Shocked, I tell you!

1 posted on 05/14/2003 8:16:59 PM PDT by EternalHope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
"In the past several months, many CNN reports on controversial government issues -- human rights, Tibet and the Falun Gong spiritual movement -- have been blacked out.

"We regret the Chinese action and we are checking the circumstances and details of the interruption," a CNN spokesman said. "In the meantime, we will continue reporting forthrightly and responsibly on SARS and other important matters."


WAIT A MINUTE... CNN admits the censorship, admits that they do not like it and then tries to say that their reporting is forthright and responsible? They agree with the censorship?
2 posted on 05/14/2003 8:22:52 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
WAIT A MINUTE... CNN admits the censorship, admits that they do not like it and then tries to say that their reporting is forthright and responsible? They agree with the censorship?


Yep. Look what they did in Sadam's Iraq
3 posted on 05/14/2003 8:25:02 PM PDT by darkwing104
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
Chinese censors blocked the airing of a CNN International interview that criticized

Why are you shocked?

Do you think the Chinese would just let criticism of them 'walk out the door' unchecked?

4 posted on 05/14/2003 8:28:06 PM PDT by _Jim (: http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030320/09/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
Why they are still on the air? I do not get it!

When reality is screaming that the NYTimes retained it's leading plagarist, for months, CNN is silent about murder in Baghdad, and now CNN admits that they are censored, but are still accurate in their reporting, my head is starting to spin.

I keep thinking that tomorrow, everyone will wake up, pull the plug on CNN and line the litter box with the NYTimes. But, I know that is too good to be true.
5 posted on 05/14/2003 8:30:50 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
DID you also know -

- that there is some south American country that is attempting to CENSOR broadcasts by another country by JAMMING a Spanish language broadcast - and that's RIGHT HERE IN OUR OWN hemisphere?

Yup. On the forty-meter international shortwave broadcast band ...

6 posted on 05/14/2003 8:31:16 PM PDT by _Jim (: http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030320/09/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
The seven-minute segment was part of the 30-minute "Insight" program. In it, Newsday reporter Laurie Garrett, author of "The Coming Plague," commented on the decrepit state of China's public health system, and accused the government of ordering doctors to underreport the number of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

The Red Chinese are once again reverting to their natural form.

7 posted on 05/14/2003 8:31:23 PM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
I keep thinking that tomorrow, everyone will wake up, pull the plug on CNN and line the litter box with the NYTimes. But, I know that is too good to be true.


If you want to see pure Anti-American propaganda just watch CNN international. Nice to know that the Space Alien Stories in the National Enquirer or is more credible then somebody.
8 posted on 05/14/2003 8:46:23 PM PDT by darkwing104
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
When reality is screaming that the NYTimes retained it's leading plagarist, for months, CNN is silent about murder in Baghdad, and now CNN admits that they are censored, but are still accurate in their reporting, my head is starting to spin.

CNN admits that their reports are censored inside China, but they didn't say that they censor their Chinese news for our consumption. This admission is significantly different from what some guy said about past censored CNN reports from Iraq.

9 posted on 05/14/2003 8:50:06 PM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: heleny
What good is their reporting the news, if they do not get the story? They admit it today... but, what is to stop them from ignoring the difficulty, and letting us forget the censorship. Are they going to put a disclaimer on every piece that they do from China, mentioning the censorship? I noticed FOX did that prior to the war beginning, when reporting from Baghdad, but CNN didn't.
10 posted on 05/14/2003 8:55:38 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
You mean they had to ask this time?
11 posted on 05/14/2003 8:58:30 PM PDT by Only1choice____Freedom (FreeperPost /Sarcasm = on /mode = max)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
I am shocked! Shocked, I tell you!

Since your response indicates you do not know what this comment means, I suggest you watch the movie "Casablanca". It will be time well spent, too.
12 posted on 05/14/2003 9:10:08 PM PDT by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: heleny
CNN admits that their reports are censored inside China, but they didn't say that they censor their Chinese news for our consumption.

And they didn't say they didn't censor their Chinese news for our consumption. They are simply covering their butts.

If they were reporting the truth, they would no longer have an office in China.

What this tactic boils down to is this: "Look, we really, really want to tell the truth, but the Chinese won't let us. We have to stay here, and make money by pandering to the regime and submitting to censorship, but it's not hypocritical, because we are an impartial news organization who can't be impartial under these circumstances, but we really would report the truth if we could, but we can't. Honest."

13 posted on 05/14/2003 9:14:44 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: browardchad; heleny
Excellent points.

A freeper has the tagline that goes something like this...

CNN: Blood for a news bureau

or something very similar in sentiment. Wish I could remember who it is. If I see it again, I'll alert you. It really cuts to the chase in the whole argument.
14 posted on 05/14/2003 9:33:48 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
And they didn't say they didn't censor their Chinese news for our consumption. They are simply covering their butts.

If they were reporting the truth, they would no longer have an office in China.

Sadly, I agree. What I meant was that CNN admitted nothing about the content of their China reports, unlike someone's admission about CNN's past Iraq reports.

15 posted on 05/14/2003 10:08:08 PM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
SARS Mortality Rates [reflects treatment]
Based on World Health Organization daily tables                 (Revised:  May 14 pm)
Area Recoveries to date Deaths to date Recent** Death Rate Active Cases still in Danger Projected Future Deaths Projected Cumulative Mortality
China 1811 267 16.3% 3046 496 14.9%
Taiwan 38 30 60.6% 170 103 55.9%
Hong Kong 1128 227 20.5% 343 70 17.5%
elsewhere
[30 countries]
420 63 14.6% 85 12 13.2%
World-wide
[all 33 countries]
3397 587   3644 584 15.4%
**  Future deaths are based on findings from the Imperial College of London
that deaths take 12 days longer on average than recoveries on average
(Deaths to Date) / (Deaths to Date + Recoveries as of 12 days ago)

You can click here to see if there is a pointer to a newer revision.

16 posted on 05/14/2003 11:12:37 PM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Freedom_Loving_Engineer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; Judith Anne; jonathonandjennifer; Mr. Mulliner; Prince Charles; Dog Gone; thinktwice; ...
SARS - Treatment/Containment tables - updated with Wednesday numbers here
17 posted on 05/14/2003 11:15:28 PM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Freedom_Loving_Engineer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: _Jim; EternalHope
Why are you shocked?

Er, I think EternalHope was being sarcastic, _Jim,. From what I can see in my brief stay on FR the 'I am shocked, shocked I tell you' phrase is used to portray sarcasm, irony, ie the opposite of what is written. :)

18 posted on 05/15/2003 12:17:24 AM PDT by neither-nor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
You really should get out more or at least rent the movie Casablanca. The shocked shocked line is from there and is definitely sarcasm.
19 posted on 05/15/2003 4:10:12 AM PDT by harpseal (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FL_engineer; Judith Anne; Mother Abigail; CathyRyan; per loin; Dog Gone; Petronski; InShanghai; ...
Thnaks for your figures. 84% of active cases now in China.
20 posted on 05/15/2003 4:13:52 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson