Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spacecraft Designer Calls for Retirement of Shuttle
Kansas City Star/Los Angeles Times ^ | Fri, May. 16, 2003 | RALPH VARTABEDIAN and PETER PAE

Posted on 05/18/2003 5:23:01 PM PDT by anymouse

A highly-regarded spacecraft designer says the space shuttle should be retired and the human space program suspended until a better vehicle can be built.

This newest critic is Max Faget, 81, who designed the Mercury space capsule and had a managing role in the design of other U.S. human launch systems, including the space shuttle, Apollo and Gemini. He has received almost every commendation that exists for engineers and was inducted into the Ohio-based National Inventor's Hall of Fame earlier this year.

"The bottom line is that the shuttle is too old," Faget said this week. "It would be very difficult to make sure it is in good shape. We ought to just stop going into space until we get a good vehicle. If we aren't willing to spend the money to do that, then we should be ashamed of ourselves."

Faget (pronounced fah-ZHAY), director of engineering for human spacecraft design at NASA for 20 years, was blunt in his criticism of the growing U.S. reliance on the Soyuz. The craft ran into problems this month when a three-man crew returning from the space station landed hundreds of miles off course.

NASA engineers at the working level said privately that they regarded Faget as "a giant in the space community whose opinions are worth more than anybody else's."

In Faget's view, the choices are obvious.

"We ought to get a decent vehicle," he said. "It could carry fewer people, but it ought to be a new vehicle."

Faget said such a program might make sense, but he questioned why anybody would use the same shuttle architecture that he pioneered almost 30 years ago.

(Excerpt) Read more at kansascity.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Technical; US: Florida; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: columbia; goliath; nasa; safety; shuttle; space; sts107
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: DPB101
Sheesh. I never said that. What a grouch!
61 posted on 05/21/2003 9:42:37 AM PDT by Paul Ross (From the State Looking Forward to Global Warming! Let's Drown France!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
A true american would go into space aboard the space shuttle.

America is a place to set up your Oneida, your New Harmony. It requires wilderness and a frontier. That America flourished 200 years ago, and is gone, gone, gone.

The American spirit needs land, lots of land, promising and unforgiving land. It is the land that allows dreams to be made real. America had that, but it is gone.

Time is now for the new America, the endless America, the America that goes on forever without limit in the expanding universe.

The Space Shuttle goes only across the Mississippi from St. Louis and back. America starts when the Space Shuttle leaves you out there. Out there where, believe it or not, a star was just discovered in Aries, only 7.8 lightyears away. We know nothing about the endless wilderness, and anything is possible out there. How can real Americans possibly be content to sit here at the dock in St. Louis when everything is just across there? If you go out there, you'll die. But guess what, if you stay here, you'll die anyway.

62 posted on 05/21/2003 9:43:23 AM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
What I should have said is yes the Space Shuttle is old technology and dangerous. I would still go on it. However, I would to go to Alpha Centauri or the new star that was discoverd. Personally I prefer to go to Alpha and hopefully find a Earth like planet and live there.
63 posted on 05/21/2003 10:19:17 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross; anymouse; RightWhale; KevinDavis
More disappointed than a grouch. The net teems with unmmaned vs manned debates. I thought, first, I would learn something by introducing the subject and, secondly, a good debate would interest more people in the subject and keep the thread alive. So far, I've learned I must be smoking dope (told this twice), I am a "wimp", my comments are suspect because I registered to post this month and I make typos.

Your comments were humorous tho....

:-)

It was the totality of it which prompted me to take it out on you. Maybe someone else (who has been here longer) will introduce the debate on the next space thread and I can hid in the weeds.

64 posted on 05/21/2003 10:32:53 AM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
The instant someone mentions robotic exploration of space the image of Sagan pops up. He is the man who killed the space program, and his agitation for using robots to the exclusion of human beings, for whatever reason, is why there is no moon base, no Mars base, no asteroid mining, no private property rights in outer space, and why people think we never went to the moon at all but Planet X is coming to knock us on the head. Sagan ===> Space Aliens.

That's how it is. Let me just ask, if we aren't going to go into space ourselves and build settlements, why bother sending robots?

65 posted on 05/21/2003 10:44:05 AM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Thanks! I didn't know that. I despised Sagan so there is one strike against unmanned flight for me (irrational as my feeling may be).

See some people refer to Ben Bova and say manned vs unmanned is a phony debate--it is not either/or. Another good comment I saw is that people tend to see the debate of how to spend the money within the budget of NASA. That appeals to me. The debate should be how much to spend within the budgets of NASA, HUD, the NEA--among others--for space exploration. I tend towards 100%.

66 posted on 05/21/2003 10:52:08 AM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
The way we sent men to the moon seemed reasonable at the time, and it involved robots, lots of them. Every camera they smashed into the moon snapping pictures all the way down was a robot. The landers they sent to potential manned landing sites were robots. Robot exploration has its place when you need to know conditions at the landing site. It was thought that a manned lunar lander might disappear to the bottom of a 1/4 mile of dust, so the Surveyors were sent ahead to test the ground.

A couple more RC cars are being sent to the surface of Mars in a couple weeks. The plan should be to check a potential settlement site, but it seems they are after pure science.

On top of that, manned space exploration is way too expensive the way it is being done. It's the usual: The ISS and the Space Shuttle were only the first stage of a true space transportation system that was to reach to the moon and to Mars. Usual in the sense that the committees got hold of the design and decided to run with that while ignoring the reason for creating it. No room for individual genius. All show, no go.

But Dr. Malin's creation is still going strong, to the consternation of the committees. An individual with a clear idea somehow got past the mission adjustors. That's what can be done, and what committees will never do. It's a robot, the MGS, and thanks to that Mars should be a goal of manned spaceflight, no question. Maybe the primary goal, although the moon should have some human presense along the way.

67 posted on 05/21/2003 11:11:49 AM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Here is one example of your 'whirligig' SSTO, called the 'Roton':


68 posted on 05/21/2003 12:39:54 PM PDT by Paul Ross (From the State Looking Forward to Global Warming! Let's Drown France!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Tom Clancy was on the board of Directors when they rolled this out in 1999 and test-flew it successfully. I don't know what the status of the prototype is currently. (As we know, a competing concept-vehicle for SSTO the DC-X, suffered an unfortunate explosion from combustible vapor buildup under its engines and was destroyed)


69 posted on 05/21/2003 12:50:23 PM PDT by Paul Ross (From the State Looking Forward to Global Warming! Let's Drown France!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Home

SPACE TRANSPORT : Spacecraft : Roton

Yep, what you see above is no computer graphic. Of all the wannabes in the aerospace private industry, Rotaryrocket is the only one which has tested a 100% scale prototype. While the Roton ATV ( Atmospheric Test Vehicle ) is not capable of even sub-orbital flight, but it is atleast a start.

Content Design
rotaryrocket.com : Rotary Rocket Company's official website. 6/10 3+3+1/10
scaled.com/projects/roton/roton.htm : Read about Scaled Composites association with Roton.
spacefuture.com/vehicles/designs.shtml : Spacefuture.com's vehicle designs page.

Back to Spacecraft setstats 1

70 posted on 05/21/2003 12:59:35 PM PDT by Paul Ross (From the State Looking Forward to Global Warming! Let's Drown France!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
You will find many, if not most of the space enthusiasts, do actually want to go forward with both manned and unmanned for the reasons already outlined by the others here...with the emphasis on the ultimate point...getting Man out there. The L-5 Society and High Frontier have nothing on us (heck a lot of 'em are here). A good source for information in the field is at SpaceFuture.com Give it a try and then come back when you have a "Thus Spake Zarathustra" Moment to share!
71 posted on 05/21/2003 1:15:11 PM PDT by Paul Ross (From the State Looking Forward to Global Warming! Let's Drown France!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
A wonderful design concept! But far from what I was imagining. I was thinking of a whirlygig of filaments stretching a few hundred miles, held to a pivot at one of the lagrangians. A space bungie cord, maybe.
72 posted on 05/21/2003 3:32:11 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson