Posted on 05/21/2003 11:06:51 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
I suspect you're making all this up. James Ragland did do two articles on the 10th anniversary. He was full-time on the case ten years ago.
He, of all people, would be on anything that might change the case.
That he isn't tells me you're inventing out of thin air.
Ragland did do the 2 columns, the 2nd of which was based on a phone interview w/ Routier's mother, and there was the 1 article by the Metro section Rowlett homer whose name escapes me atm...
I'm not calling anybody.
I remember this case, and I agree with you 100% on that.
http://www.fox.com/mdmystery/103/routier.htm
Link doesn't work.
What is Darlie's husband doing these days? ReMarried yet?
"Her family, Mother, Mother in Law, Husband all are convinced of her innocence"
Darlie appeared to be narcisstic.Her mother and her husband were enablers. They both are a piece of work from what I saw of them. I still don't understand how the father of the children can defend their murderer.
What is Darlie's husband doing these days? ReMarried yet?
well I hope so if they could afford it with that booming cpu chip business, and recent yeah they were kids, only on earth for several years so that qualifies as recent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.