Skip to comments.
DEMS ARE LOSING THE 'TERROR' WAR
New York Post ^
| 5/22/03
| DEBORAH ORIN
Posted on 5/22/2003, 8:41:19 AM by kattracks
Edited on 5/27/2004, 12:13:55 AM by Jim Robinson.
[history]
May 22, 2003 -- THE terror alert is up and so is the angst among Democratic 2004 wannabes because they know it's politically dumb and dumber to try to blame terror jitters on President Bush - but they just can't help themselves.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004
To: kattracks
Like it won't help the Dems? Don't underestimate the stupidity of the American public.
Most don't care. They are too stupid to understand what is at stake. They'll buy into the lies. I have no confidence in the "average" American.
2
posted on
5/22/2003, 8:45:37 AM
by
Fledermaus
(Fed up in Tennessee)
To: kattracks
The Dims biggest problem is THEY DON'T HAVE A PLAN.
The only plans I've heard thus far have been about healthcare. Healthcare for crying out loud.
Expanding social programs in the face of increased terrorism and market jitters and they want to increase the size of the nannny state.
Unbelieveable.
I think these guys believe their own press releases.
3
posted on
5/22/2003, 8:49:48 AM
by
dyed_in_the_wool
(Syria. Iran. North Korea. Decisions, decisions, decisions...)
To: dyed_in_the_wool
they want to increase the size of the nannny stateYes, and any excuse will do, no matter how plausible.
4
posted on
5/22/2003, 8:59:02 AM
by
sourcery
(The Evil Party thinks their opponents are stupid. The Stupid Party thinks their opponents are evil.)
To: kattracks
5
posted on
5/22/2003, 9:47:14 AM
by
Nick Danger
(The liberals are slaughtering themselves at the gates of the newsroom)
To: kattracks
THE terror alert is up and so is the angst among Democratic 2004 wannabes because they know it's politically dumb and dumber to try to blame terror jitters on President Bush - but they just can't help themselves. What's really troubling about this is that every time the democrats publicly berate President Bush for the war on Iraq and point to it as the blame for the current crop of terrorist acts and continue to do so, I can't help but believe this *has* to be sending a signal to terrorists that their methods of madness are working and more is needed to topple our government because "it is selfp-destructing." I find the democrats politicizing the recent bombings as absolutely the worst case of irresponsibility if not outright encouragement to those mad bombers who want to kill us all!
To: hotpotato
What's really troubling about this is that every time the democrats publicly berate President Bush for the war on Iraq and point to it as the blame for the current crop of terrorist acts and continue to do so, I can't help but believe this *has* to be sending a signal to terrorists that their methods of madness are working and more is needed to topple our government because "it is selfp-destructing."Which plays right into the Dem's hands.
After all, they were hoping the war in Iraq would go badly for the US, in order for them to gain, politically.
The Dems ONLY consideration is gaining power, and they don't care how that comes about, or how many American lives it costs.
To: kattracks
Someone wrote the BEST description of Kerry...."He looks like a clean-shaven Abe Lincoln on the day he found out his dog DIED! LOL! (Why the long face, John?)
8
posted on
5/22/2003, 10:39:34 AM
by
Claire Voyant
((visualize whirled peas))
To: dyed_in_the_wool
The Dims biggest problem is THEY DON'T HAVE A PLAN. I keep waiting for a reporter to ask the obvious question. "What specifically would you do?"
Silly of me, I know.
9
posted on
5/22/2003, 10:51:53 AM
by
Vinnie
To: kattracks
Silly question, How much money will the dumb-o-crats need to recruit all the dead people to vote for them?
10
posted on
5/22/2003, 11:03:38 AM
by
chiefqc
To: Fledermaus
Exactly what makes us different from the average American?
11
posted on
5/22/2003, 12:14:17 PM
by
askrenr
To: Fledermaus
Most don't care. They are too stupid to understand what is at stake. They'll buy into the lies. I have no confidence in the "average" American. Ah yes no confidence in the 'average' american voter. Perhaps you would have confidence in a strong leader. Many of them have been successful for awhile. Adolf, Stalin, and even Saddam come to mind.
People who don't trust national decisions to 'average' people should go live in a dictatorship. In your desired dictatorship don't leave important decisions up to 'average' people. They delegate the future to strong leaders who make strong enforceable decisions. People like you are the ones that always put the dictators in power. You are also the first in the gas and torture chambers,as well.
To: Common Tator
LOL!!! The dems are communist progressive pig losers so they sent
their hero to spin for them.
To: kattracks
But according to Tim Russert last night on CNBC an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll Americans are more concerned about healthcare than terrorism!(Sarcasm)
What do you say to that my friends?
To: kattracks
Could it be the Dems have no terror gravitas
15
posted on
5/22/2003, 1:01:11 PM
by
snooker
To: kattracks
But the broader issue for Kerry and all the other wannabes is that Americans trust Bush on terror and terror is back at center stage, so they have to figure out how to deal with it. Since McGovern, the Democratic Party has existed to reign in American power, they cannot turn on a dime and back something that not only requires its use but begs its prominent display.
This issue is lose-lose for the dems and a win-win for a strong America.
To: kattracks
NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll conducted by the polling organizations of Peter Hart (D) and Robert Teeter (R). Latest: May 17-19, 2003. N=1,000 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.1. |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
"If President Bush runs for reelection in 2004, do you think you will probably vote for President Bush or probably vote for the Democratic candidate?" |
|
|
Bush |
Democrat |
Another Party's Candidate (vol.) |
Depends (vol.) |
Not Sure |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
5/03 |
47 |
32 |
2 |
12 |
7 |
|
4/03 |
52 |
24 |
4 |
14 |
6 |
|
1/03 |
41 |
34 |
3 |
16 |
6 |
|
12/02 |
42 |
28 |
4 |
20 |
6 |
|
10/02 (RV) |
45 |
31 |
3 |
17 |
4 |
|
RV = registered voters |
|
17
posted on
5/22/2003, 3:15:35 PM
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: dyed_in_the_wool
The only plans I've heard thus far have been about healthcare. Healthcare for crying out loud. Healthcare could be an issue, but you'd have to come up with somthing that puts more control in the hands of the consumer, rather than less. What the dems can't get through their heads is that people want to choose their doctors, and do not want faceless agencies -- not even private insurance companies -- making decisions for them. The only way to solve this is to invent a system in which people pay according to the quality and quantity of care they get -- in other words, the marketplace. Medical savings accounts would be a step in the right direction.
18
posted on
5/22/2003, 3:25:00 PM
by
js1138
To: Fledermaus
Well ... I remember that just at the time x42 was impeached, 75% of the public thought he should stay in office; however, JUST ONE YEAR LATER (while the truth started leaking out) that same group had turned against x42, and now the 75% believed x42 should have been removed from office.
Then came 9/11.
It is a new day - and the American public is a lot smarter than perhaps you are giving them credit. And ... you must remember that during impeachment the mainstream media still ruled the roost; they don't anymore.
19
posted on
5/22/2003, 9:11:06 PM
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: Fledermaus
Me, neither. Used to have, but then I grew up and lost my childish naiveté. Also learned about the bell curve concept, and that median IQ runs in the 90-110 range. That means about half the population has IQ's ranging from 90 and below, and those seem to be the folks the Dems pander to most.
20
posted on
5/22/2003, 9:27:52 PM
by
Wolfstar
(If we don't re-elect this truly great President, we're NUTS!)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson