Posted on 05/22/2003 11:29:01 PM PDT by rffan34
BTW, did you read the article in post #29? It's an account of the first bake sale that the UCLA pubbies held, and it was extra clever (the bake sale mentioned in the original article was actually the second bake sale).
WRONG!
Many, many of you got lower grades and vastly lower SAT scores and were still admitted to UCLA and Berkeley while better qualified, non-minority students were turned away.
Affirmative Action lives on under the guise of "obstacles the student had to overcome" which rewards the student's application with something like 12-20 points.
A perfect SAT score or four years of a varsity sport nets the student ONE point!
"Business Week" has a cover story saying over 60% of college students are now girls.
Where are those boys who should be in college but have been displaced by girls?
Pathetic.
It was never about "equality" or "50/50." It was always about turning the educational system over to lesbian socialists.
They follow orders better than anyone.
Don't take the glossy brochure and the like from the collges seriously. My daughter, graduating from high school next month, got the same thing in bales. She was also solicited by at least a hundred to two hundred colleges. Most of which she wouldn't even think of considering. The fact is, if you have a bright child with good grades, test scores and some sports or extra curriculars, there are only about 350 colleges and universities that are on the radar screen. Of those, you will self-eliminate all but 50 or so pretty quickly. Then you'll compare your daughter's interests and profile with the schools strengths and profiles and come up with a short list of maybe 15-20 that you'll be looking at fairly seriously by junior year, perhaps visiting most of them, but at least spending real time on their web sites and with their viewbooks. By senior year, you'll have a list of 5-10 that she'll apply to, and you may find one or two unexpected possiblities that come up in unusual ways.
Chances are [unless your daughter has an "ivy only" mentality and doesn't have the qualifications (i.e. not only the grades and scores, but a serious sport or legacy status)] she'll be accepted at at least 2-3 on her list and have a choice of colleges at which she will be very happy.
Yeah...right!!!! They fill the positions of Admissions Officers, Human Resource Managers, etc.
They make full use of what they have learned.
"I just think it's sad to know that they think of us as people who got in here just for our race," said Ana Fernandez, a third-year political science student.
This is one of the reasons why conservatives have opposed preferences! This is exactly what preferences HAS to lead to.
I'm not familiar with UCLA's system but if they follow the same quota system as Michigan, I'm guessing Ms. Fernandez "ethnicity" counted more than here SAT score.
I'm a college student and my tuition is going up 10% primarily due to Affirmative Action. They want to "diversify" the student population. I call it socialism.
Tell me more . . . these days are coming up pretty quickly, and I have been out of the loop since I attended college - which was back in the dark ages (1973-1977).
I went to Princeton, but I have been wondering whether to even consider applying her. She has the grades (honor roll and low to mid 90s in her first year at the best prep school in Atlanta) and the extracurriculars (music, athletics, BSA Venturer), but the school has gotten so selective (and disgustingly liberal - vide Peter Singer -) not to mention outrageously expensive, that I wonder if it's worth it. It was only the second or third year that they admitted women when I got in, and they were heavily recruiting women from the South. I think they may have even mistakenly believed I was black (because my third choice was Clark College in Massachusetts where my aunt was the registrar, and there is also a Clark College in Atlanta that is one of the "traditionally black schools". One in the eye for them if they did!)
Anyhow, do you have any suggestions? If she decides to go pre-vet (she is toying with that idea at present), it's the University of Georgia all the way. Otherwise, we're looking at small but top-drawer, liberal arts schools. Preferably conservative, although my daughter is a very strong-minded libertarian-leaning conservative and a whole university full of liberals could not change her mind one iota (she argues with her more liberal teachers now.) Davidson is on the radar, as is Rhodes College.
I'm sure the college advisory phalanx at her school will have lots of helpful advice as the time draws near -- they were certainly full of it when I came along!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.