Skip to comments.
Tell Me Again. Why Are The Kennedys Royal? [A history of the Kennedys]
TooGood ^
| 5/23/2003
| Lowell Phillips
Posted on 05/23/2003 7:37:16 AM PDT by ZGuy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
05/23/2003 7:37:16 AM PDT
by
ZGuy
To: ZGuy
Camelot is pronounced "Came-a-lot"
To: ZGuy
cause the new york times said so.
To: ZGuy
royal pains is more like it
To: ZGuy
In 1776 we fought a war to get rid of Royal families. I think the wide eyed Sheeple who make idols out of people should move to Europe.
6
posted on
05/23/2003 7:48:20 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Semper Gumby - Always flexible)
To: ZGuy
"Why Are The Kennedys Royal?"
Because they have "Blue Blood"-
Ever take a look at Teddy's flushed face?
'Enouf said.
To: John Beresford Tipton
"Why Are The Kennedys Royal?" Is it because they drink a lot of this ??
To: ZGuy
Please. This is typical behavior of those who believe they are of the "aristocracy" and "above the common ruck". Sadly, it is not legal to engage in such sports as tarring and feathering politicians anymore.
9
posted on
05/23/2003 8:03:42 AM PDT
by
dark_lord
(The Statue of Liberty now holds a baseball bat and she's yelling 'You want a piece of me?')
To: ZGuy
JFK was the first "Hollywood President". With his election, the mass media first began to understand the true magnitude of their power. Media liberals of the time, like the authoritarian snob Chet Huntley, were ecstatic. His successors have been running wild ever since. The continued elaboration of the Kennedy hagiography is essential to the Hollywood/Madison Avenue Cultural Axis in retaining its iron grip on the American conciousness.
10
posted on
05/23/2003 8:05:58 AM PDT
by
atomic conspiracy
( Anti-war movement: road-kill on the highway to freedom.)
To: MD_Willington_1976
Also smuggled a lot of it during Prohibition.
11
posted on
05/23/2003 8:07:15 AM PDT
by
atomic conspiracy
( Anti-war movement: road-kill on the highway to freedom.)
To: bmwcyle
Wanna guess which side the Rats would have been on in 1776?
12
posted on
05/23/2003 8:20:04 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Let see......they wear red now....UMMMMMM
13
posted on
05/23/2003 8:24:24 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Semper Gumby - Always flexible)
To: MD_Willington_1976
You are of course right in seeing the relationship between drinking Chivas Regal and the Royal Kennedy Clan.
It might go further than that even,
I've heard that no matter how thirsty they are,
and that is *pretty* thirsty, they will not drink Drambuie, because they know that Drambuie is sometimes drunk in rememberance of a mere pretender to royalty, Bonnie Prince Charlie.
To: John Beresford Tipton
Ever take a look at Teddy's flushed face? I wonder if Joe Kennedy ever philandered in the casinos in Arkansas. Clinton acts like one of his sons in many ways. For some reason, someone paid for Clinton ---a Southern Baptist to go to Catholic parochial schools.
15
posted on
05/23/2003 8:39:50 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: ZGuy
Royal? More like Mob.
16
posted on
05/23/2003 8:41:49 AM PDT
by
ampat
To: John Beresford Tipton
King Teddy I:
To: ZGuy
Thanks, Good Read.
What was it that a freeper said about the Kennedy family a few months ago:
Can't drive a boat; can't drive a car; can't fly a plane; can't ski; can't swim; can't play golf; can't sail.
18
posted on
05/23/2003 8:53:13 AM PDT
by
aShepard
To: ZGuy
The question is not "Why are the Kennedy's Royal?"
The real question is "Why are the Clintons Trailer Trash and can we smear the Kennedys to improve their image?"
19
posted on
05/23/2003 9:01:37 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help support terrorism.)
To: ZGuy
Royal pain in the rear, they are. . .
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson