[N. Theknow]

Camelot is pronounced "Came-a-lot"

[2timothy3.16]

cause the new york times said so.

[SMEDLEYBUTLER]

[new cruelty]

royal pains is more like it

[bmwcyle]

In 1776 we fought a war to get rid of Royal families. I think the wide eyed Sheeple who make idols out of people should move to Europe.

[John Beresford Tipton]

"Why Are The Kennedys Royal?"

Because they have "Blue Blood"-
Ever take a look at Teddy's flushed face?
'Enouf said.

[dark_lord]

Please. This is typical behavior of those who believe they are of the "aristocracy" and "above the common ruck". Sadly, it is not legal to engage in such sports as tarring and feathering politicians anymore.

[atomic conspiracy]

JFK was the first "Hollywood President". With his election, the mass media first began to understand the true magnitude of their power. Media liberals of the time, like the authoritarian snob Chet Huntley, were ecstatic. His successors have been running wild ever since. The continued elaboration of the Kennedy hagiography is essential to the Hollywood/Madison Avenue Cultural Axis in retaining its iron grip on the American conciousness.

[ampat]

Royal? More like Mob.

[aShepard]

Thanks, Good Read.

What was it that a freeper said about the Kennedy family a few months ago:

Can't drive a boat; can't drive a car; can't fly a plane; can't ski; can't swim; can't play golf; can't sail.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The question is not "Why are the Kennedy's Royal?"

The real question is "Why are the Clintons Trailer Trash and can we smear the Kennedys to improve their image?"

[Stefan Stackhouse]

Royal pain in the rear, they are. . .

[RichInOC]

"It's good ta be da King...."

[Tailgunner Joe]

bttt