Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hollywood and the supposed boycotts that have pundits all up in arms
www.hollywood-hero.us ^ | 05-24-03 | www.hollywood-hero.us

Posted on 05/24/2003 10:02:19 AM PDT by lisaann8

Hollywood and the supposed boycotts that have pundits all up in arms

By Lisa Sarrach – President 

There have been scores of columns written in the past month or so by pundits and activists showing their collective disgust and outrage over the treatment of the Dixie Chicks and more recently Danny Glover, harkening back to the time of the McCarthy Era and blacklisting. 

Just last Thursday, the Detroit News’ own Laura Berman displayed her outrage at the new supposed Hollywood blacklist being compiled by “high-tech bullies” who want to “drum up ratings and drown out dissent”. 

Let’s take a walk back to the studio days of Hollywood, when actors and actresses were under contract to one studio, and they were subject to morals clauses.  Almost anything that could cause embarrassment to the studio was subject to suspension or out and out firing.  Act such as adultery, children out of wedlock, committing crimes, drugs and alcohol abuse could get you suspended or released from your studio contract.   

(Excerpt) Read more at hollywood-hero.us ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Editorial; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: boycotts; dannyglover; hollyweird; hollywood; hollywoodhero; hollywoodleft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 05/24/2003 10:02:19 AM PDT by lisaann8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lisaann8
Sorry Hollywood, we have a right to respond in our own way to your comments. It IS a free country, remember?
2 posted on 05/24/2003 10:06:13 AM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lisaann8
aww schucks
3 posted on 05/24/2003 10:09:14 AM PDT by I'mAllRightJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lisaann8
Just last Thursday, the Detroit News’ own Laura Berman displayed her outrage at the new supposed Hollywood blacklist being compiled by “high-tech bullies” who want to “drum up ratings and drown out dissent”.

I wondered what happened to Berman. Looks like she doesn't like how business works either. No one's taking away anyone's free speech. I'm just choosing not to buy the products of certain individuals. I won't buy Michael Moore's junk.

4 posted on 05/24/2003 10:13:05 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("It's the same ole story, same ole song and dance, my friend")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lisaann8
The Hollywood liberals want to have it both ways. They want to be able to criticise the republicans for their beleifs with no repercussions to them. But when the GOP takes aim at the libs they say we are not being fair and should not attack them for their beliefs. The 1st ammendment only restricts the government from censuring free speech not individuals. We certainly have a right to attack liberals for what they say.
5 posted on 05/24/2003 10:15:40 AM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lisaann8
At least during the McCarthy era the communist went underground.

Hopefully the modern anti-american crowd will slither under a rock when the heat of public opinion and boycott hits them. With lots of hissing of course.

6 posted on 05/24/2003 10:16:08 AM PDT by TUX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lisaann8
Ms. Berman’s bottom line suggestion that there is a return of the Blacklist is disingenuous. The McCarthy hearings of the 1950’s was a government run operation, this is 21st century consumer driven call to arms; to quote from Peter Finch in Network, “We’re mad as hell and we’re not going to take it anymore”.

A dose of their own medicine!!!!!

7 posted on 05/24/2003 10:17:28 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lisaann8
"High Tech Bullies" Funny didn't they mean ex-fans with more money in their own pockets?
8 posted on 05/24/2003 10:19:55 AM PDT by OREALLY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lisaann8
And if you continue to blame America first, disrespect the people across America who pay your salaries by purchasing your products, and continue to disparage a president that 70% of the people in this country respect and admire, then you have earned the right to be fired by the American people.

Most of the "B" and "C"-list actors on the assorted "Boycott Hollywood" lists were fired by the American people some time ago.

Mike Farrell, Ed Asner, what have you guys done lately? Susan Sarandon hasn't had a blockbuster since "Thelma and Louise" and that was during the first Bush Administration. Same with Tim Robbins who (aside for the suprising success of "Shawshank Redemption" --which was carried by conservative actor, Morgan Freeman) hasn't really had a hit since 1988's "Bull Durham."

Where are the A-list actors? What are Tom Cruise's opinions on war? How does Tom Hanks feel about president Bush? These actors (and many others) have wisely chosen to keep their mouths shut as they don't want to offend huge segments of movie going Americans.

There is another reason why many of these actors are keeping their mouths shut. Could it be that they agree with the President, like him, and don't want to get "blacklisted" and "boycotted" by their own producers and co-stars? I'm sure for many (though I doubt most) Hollywood actors, this is the case.

Personally, I'll boycott Hollywood for making crappy movies. I won't boycott Hollywood because an handful of so-called "stars" (many of whom haven't actually been famous since the Carter-era) want to see their names in print.

9 posted on 05/24/2003 10:24:24 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Hal
Hey, remember when Gore's wife was on a tare to eleminate nasty lyrics in music. That didn't bother them(the Hollywood artists), at least not out loud. Now if she had been Cheny's wife, well......
10 posted on 05/24/2003 10:41:27 AM PDT by stubernx98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Hey Dan
We are from the Great Lake state of Michigan too -
now we are in NYC - we gotta spread around our strong midwest values... in the arts as we are it is a bit tricky....
Laura Berman has it all wrong...the 'high tech-bullies' she talks about are just regular folk who finally have some mode of tranmitting our views...the multi-zillionaire Hollywooders get all the TV / airtime they want...
What is wrong with Berman...I absolutely will never go see a film or buy a record of any of these left-wing spoiled stars.
11 posted on 05/24/2003 11:31:09 AM PDT by LibertyLight (Light is always on - but there are times to turn off - BJ Clinton should put his head in a sack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibertyLight
Where in Michigan? I'm from Livingston County(even Carl Lenin lost here) - 1/2 way between Detroit/Lansing.

Berman's had it wrong for years. She's the major liberal at the Detroit News. I remember her anti-gun editorials from a couple of years ago.

12 posted on 05/24/2003 11:47:04 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("It's the same ole story, same ole song and dance, my friend")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lisaann8
With the money I save from Blockbusters think I'll subscribe to the Washington Times or the WSJ.
13 posted on 05/24/2003 1:12:27 PM PDT by kcar (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter
It IS a free country, remember?

If the PC types in Hollywierd have anything to say about it, it won't be for long.

14 posted on 05/24/2003 3:01:10 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lisaann8
...harkening back to the time of the McCarthy Era and blacklisting.

Liberals suck.

15 posted on 05/24/2003 3:06:02 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lisaann8
Speaking with the almighty dollar. Kind of put the kabosh on the idea that campaign reform is not limiting free speach, don't it?
16 posted on 05/24/2003 3:10:37 PM PDT by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OREALLY
High Tech Bullies to these nitwits means folks with PC's and online subscriptions.

If that passes for high tech for these people, I'm a geek.
17 posted on 05/24/2003 5:14:54 PM PDT by OpusatFR (Using pretentious arcane words to buttress your argument means you don't have one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lisaann8
bump
18 posted on 05/24/2003 5:17:09 PM PDT by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lisaann8
From 2/23/03 -

Clooney, 41, said Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was making a mistake to think a war against Iraq would be an easy win for the United States.

"I believe he thinks this is a war that can be won, but there is no such thing anymore," said Clooney, who starred in a film about the 1991 Gulf War "Three Kings" that took a dark look at the war to drive Iraq out of Kuwait.

"We can't beat anyone anymore," added Clooney, who has called it unfair that Americans opposed to war are being branded unpatriotic.

Clooney, who won fame for his leading role in long-running hospital drama "ER", has also appeared in films including "Batman and Robin", "The Perfect Storm" and "Brother Where Art Thou?".

Dipstick Clooney is on my PERMANENT excrement list...

19 posted on 05/24/2003 5:39:59 PM PDT by Libloather (Proud member of the Vast Right Wing Fatwa...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
PS...the funny part about hollywood and the others who support all these ridiculous causes is one of these days we could all wake up under a socialist way of life and then guess what? Hollywood and their ilk would NOT have any of the trappings and bank accounts and all the things they have now. Their kids would go to the schools the Gov't sends them too and and they would have NOTHING...the only ones who would have anything would be the vile ones in charge. Why Hollywood and their ilk can't see this is beyond me. They better pray people like President Bush continues to protect the American people or the life they wake up too will be nothing like they are living and by then it will be too late to do anything about it. They will be part of a GROUP of people because individuals and individualism will be gone!!! Wake up Hollywood. You probably in our own minds have the most to lose.
20 posted on 05/24/2003 6:52:16 PM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson