Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Iran an Arab Country?
Slate ^ | 5/25/03 | Chris Suellentrop

Posted on 05/25/2003 3:27:10 PM PDT by freedom44

Several readers objected to Slate's characterization of Iran as an "Arab neighbor" in a dossier on the Saudi royal family. Who are the Arabs, and is Iran an Arab country?

The answer to the second question is easy: No. But explaining why Iran isn't an Arab country requires the answer to the first.

Who are the Arabs? It's not a facile question. Historian Bernard Lewis devotes 14 pages to the subject in his introduction to The Arabs in History. Part of the problem, Lewis warns, is that the term Arab "may be used in several different senses at one and the same time, and that a standard general definition of its content has rarely been possible."

The easiest definition is to say that an Arab is simply someone who speaks Arabic. But that's not satisfactory. Not all Arabic-speaking peoples identify themselves as Arabs.

Lewis cites two broader definitions as more accurate. A group of Arab leaders once stated that "whoever lives in our country, speaks our language, is brought up in our culture and takes pride in our glory is one of us." The scholar Sir Hamilton Gibb put it this way: "All those are Arabs for whom the central fact of history is the mission of Muhammad and the memory of the Arab Empire and who in addition cherish the Arab tongue and its cultural heritage as their common possession."

Both of those definitions encompass more than just language. The first definition adds a geographic element and a cultural element, and Gibb adds religion to the mix. Encarta Online gives a fairly succinct definition that includes all four elements: "the ancient and present-day inhabitants of the Arabian Peninsula and often applied to the peoples closely allied to them in ancestry, language, religion, and culture." Part of the problem with understanding the meaning of "Arab," Lewis writes in another book, is that secular Westerners have "great difficulty understanding a culture in which not citizenship, not nationality, not descent, but religion, or more precisely, membership of a religious community, is the ultimate determinant of identity."

To those definitions, Lewis adds a more recent usage that excises religion by regarding "the Arabic-speaking peoples as a nation or group of sister nations in the modern sense, linked by a common territory, language, and culture." Arab Christians--who weren't designated that way until the 19th century--were particularly attracted to that version of Arab nationalism because it would make them full members of the state.

What territory do Arabs inhabit? The Arab conquests of the seventh century spread the Arabic language and civilization from North Africa to central Asia. Under the Islamic caliphate, Arabic became the language of scripture, government, law, literature, and science. Majority Arabic-speaking countries remain in southwest Asia, Egypt, and North Africa. The Arab League includes Algeria, Bahrain, Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, the Palestine Liberation Organization, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, the United Arab Emirates, and Yemen.

Note the absent country: Iran. Alone among the Middle Eastern peoples conquered by the Arabs, the Iranians did not lose their language or their identity. Ethnic Persians make up 60 percent of modern Iran, and modern Persian is the official language. (Persian also has official status in Afghanistan, where Dari, or Afghan Persian, is one of two official languages.) In addition, the majority of Iranians are Shiite Muslims while most Arabs are Sunni Muslims. So Iran fails most of the four-part test of language, ancestry, religion, and culture.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arabs; iran; persians; southasia; southasialist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 05/25/2003 3:27:11 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

FWIW

I once heard an Iranian make a comment about this - (paraphrasing)... that "Iran begins where the camels stop".

2 posted on 05/25/2003 3:30:29 PM PDT by Xphantasos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic; SJackson; knighthawk; McGavin999; Stultis; river rat; Live free or die; ...
on or off iran ping
3 posted on 05/25/2003 3:31:44 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Linguistically it is not. Culturally it is.
4 posted on 05/25/2003 3:34:39 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Persian is the official language.

Farsi is the official language.

5 posted on 05/25/2003 3:37:32 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
No it's not. Culturally they're extremely different. It's like saying US has a similar culture of France.

Iranians don't even understand Arabs much less share a similar culture with them.

6 posted on 05/25/2003 3:38:17 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Persian is english translation of Farsi.

Fars is a region in Iran which the Greeks called Persia. Hence Farsi is the root Iranian language way of saying the western translation.

Farsi is what was used in the east and Persian was the translation of the word.

Same thing.
7 posted on 05/25/2003 3:39:47 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Persian is english translation of Farsi.

Fars is a region in Iran which the Greeks called Persia. Hence Farsi is the root Iranian language way of saying the western translation.

Farsi is what was used in the east and Persian was the translation of the word.

Same thing.
8 posted on 05/25/2003 3:39:53 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Persian is english translation of Farsi.

Fars is a region in Iran which the Greeks called Persia. Hence Farsi is the root Iranian language way of saying the western translation.

Farsi is what was used in the east and Persian was the translation of the word.

Same thing.
9 posted on 05/25/2003 3:39:53 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
woops.. it came up three times, Admin moderator can you delete please?
10 posted on 05/25/2003 3:41:07 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Iranians (Persians) are closer to Germans than Arabs, ie. Indo-Aryans (indo-caucasian).

yitbos

11 posted on 05/25/2003 3:43:27 PM PDT by bruinbirdman (Veritas vos liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
It is not unusual for an Iranian to read, write or speak Arabic. There are several reasons for this one of which is to understand the Koran in the Prophet's language as he received it from God.

You want to get right with God, you learn His language, eh?!

12 posted on 05/25/2003 3:44:40 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ir.html Yes it's quite unusual. Languages: Persian and Persian dialects 58%, Turkic and Turkic dialects 26%, Kurdish 9%, Luri 2%, Balochi 1%, Arabic 1%, Turkish 1%, other 2%
13 posted on 05/25/2003 3:46:41 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
i had close iranian friends in los angeles.

they did not like arabs.

they were light-skinned, passed for american whites, and indeed, if you look on a map, the caucasas mountains are nearby.
14 posted on 05/25/2003 3:48:46 PM PDT by liberalnot (what democrats fear the most is democracy .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Kill 'em all and let allah sort it out.
15 posted on 05/25/2003 3:49:33 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Ok, Adolf.
16 posted on 05/25/2003 3:57:46 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: liberalnot
Most Iranians are caucasians, not Arabs. That is, they are closer ethnically to Poles and Slavs than to Ahabs.
17 posted on 05/25/2003 3:58:12 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
how's that different than what i posted?
18 posted on 05/25/2003 4:04:23 PM PDT by liberalnot (what democrats fear the most is democracy .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
This thread answers many questions I have had. Thank you for posting it.

"Ok, Adolf."

ROTFLOL! That one caught me off guard. You're quick...;o)

19 posted on 05/25/2003 4:09:01 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (Never have so many, been so wrong, about so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: liberalnot
Your experience is similar to mine. The few Iranians I have known were adamant that they were NOT arabs. They were insulted if anyone called them Arabs, and were quick to correct if such was stated.

This also fits with what I was taught in Jr. High school -- that all peoples were divided into the three "classic" races -- Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid. Iranians and Indians are both considered part of the Caucasoid race in the classic sense. I don't recall where the Arabs fit, but it wasn't Caucasoid.
20 posted on 05/25/2003 4:09:05 PM PDT by RedWhiteBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson