I think we do need "regime change" in Iran, there is no doubt about that. Right now, I'd rather we not go in and invade, unless they get close to building a nuke, or are on the verge of getting one. What we should do, is continue to build up resistance internally, undermine the government there, if possible, use assainations and discreditations of key iranian leaders, find the dirt on them, or manufacture it, and get it out to the people, while contineing the rally the masses and rabble rouse, until we get a genuine revolution that overthrows the current government there.
1 posted on
05/25/2003 4:47:56 PM PDT by
Sonny M
To: Sonny M
Libs are dangerous whimps.
2 posted on
05/25/2003 4:52:27 PM PDT by
ALS
("We are the president." Hillary Clinton)
To: Sonny M
ping!
4 posted on
05/25/2003 5:01:34 PM PDT by
freedom44
To: *southasia_list
To: Sonny M
find the dirt on them, or manufacture it Sure, manufacturing it will NEVER backfire. That's not necessary, anyway. The 30-and-under generation, the vast majority of the population, are ready to rebel. So, apparently, are a goodly portion of their elders. I propose another arms-for-hostages deal. To the freedom-desiring Iranians: we'll get you arms, you take the Mullahs hostage - for 444 years.
6 posted on
05/25/2003 7:53:17 PM PDT by
UpNAtEm
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson