Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pat Buchanan rebuffs hypocrite O'Reilly
www.wnd.com ^ | May 26, 2003 | Patrick J Buchanan

Posted on 05/26/2003 2:39:22 AM PDT by oldconservative

This spring, white students at Johnson County High in Wrightsville, Ga., continued a tradition they have followed since desegregation. They held a prom separate from the school prom – for white students only. As did the juniors at neighboring Taylor County High.

News of the separate proms reached Bill O'Reilly at Fox News, who angrily demanded that Gov. Sonny Perdue attend the official Taylor County prom in protest. As columnist Sam Francis writes, O'Reilly seemed miffed that there was no law or authority to stop this outrage:

"You can't sue because the event is being held off-campus. It's a private party, and no person of color is welcome. Yet, the party is being held under the banner of Taylor High's junior prom. Yes, there is an alternative prom where everyone is welcome, but still a number of your classmates do not want to celebrate with you."

Writing in the Los Angeles Times, law student Jeffrey Shapiro seemed even more indignant: "It's hard to imagine that the practice of segregation still exists in the United States, but it does," Shapiro states. "Authorities are powerless to intervene."

Yes, and a good thing they cannot intervene, Jeffrey. For if this country is about anything, it is freedom. And just as the Bill of Rights prevents the state from interfering with what Shapiro or O'Reilly writes or says, the Constitution protects the freedom of school kids in Taylor County, Ga., to associate with whomever they wish

When O'Reilly says that an all-white prom appears to be a snub of black schoolmates, he may be right. But it may also mean the white kids simply prefer to party together. As for Shapiro's assertion that "segregated proms" are one of "the worst public displays of racism in today's America," that is absurd.

The ugliest manifestations of racism today are not all-white proms, but interracial crimes such as gang assaults, gang shootings and gang rapes.

As this term racist is tossed about, perhaps it is time to define it. To this writer, racism means a hatred or hostility toward some other race that manifests itself in a desire to deny the other justice.

What O'Reilly and Shapiro are upset about is something else altogether. For there is no evidence the white kids of Taylor County hate all their black classmates. A preference for socializing with one's own is not hatred. CYO dances used to be restricted to baptized Catholics. That didn't mean the priests and nuns hated all non-Catholics. The same is true for the Newman clubs and Hillel houses on college campuses. These clubs represent the desire of a group to socialize together. This is not racism. It is natural and normal, and there is nothing morally reprehensible about it.

As for the new separatism or self-segregation in schools, this appears to be more the wish of black students than of whites. Here, for example, is Washington Post writer Michael Fletcher describing the graduation events at Penn:

"The presentation of the class of 2003 was the central event at this year's Black Senior Celebration. The ceremony here, attended by almost half of the university's 140 black graduating seniors, followed separate celebrations that honored Asian American and Latino seniors in the weeks leading up to Penn's general graduation ceremony today. University officials say these racially and ethnically themed ceremonies are a way for minority students to celebrate their cultural connections."

If it is acceptable for black students in the Ivy League to hold segregated ceremonies to celebrate their "cultural connections," why is O'Reilly beating up on white high-school kids in rural Georgia for doing the same thing?

Vanderbilt, Michigan State, Michigan, Stanford and Berkeley all host separate ceremonies for black graduates. Across America, writes Fletcher, there are black "fraternities, sororities and culture centers." Black students "study in separate groups, they eat at segregated dining tables, and they unwind at separate parties."

Does this mean black students hate their white classmates? Of course not. They simply prefer to socialize with one another.

At Penn, the university even pays for the kente cloths and the sumptuous banquet at the graduation ceremony at the black student center Makuu. In Johnson and Taylor counties, parents pay for the white proms.

Again the question reasserts itself: If it is perfectly acceptable for black, Asian and Hispanic students to have separate dorms and cultural centers in college, subsidized by tax dollars, why is it an outrage that white high-school kids in rural Georgia have their own prom, paid for by their own parents? Whatever did these white folks do to lose the right to equal respect and equal treatment?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: association; freedom; ohubcap; oreilly; patbuchanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: farmerbrown
The idea of an all-white prom in America is a total loser and invites problems unnecessarily. It may be legal, but it's utterly stupid and lacking in redeeming features.

What about an all-black beauty contest or something like a hispanic chamber of commerce? They have those here and no one points out the racism in those.

41 posted on 05/26/2003 6:37:05 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tame
BLACK WOMAN magazine. There is JET magazine. There is EBONY magazine, etc. But I yet to see White Woman mag, or Cloud mag, or Ivory mag...How 'bout it O'Reilly???

What would happen to all the magazines like that if they had to include an appropriate number of whites and others to match the ratio of the overall society? They would also have to include a fair number of articles in Spanish.

42 posted on 05/26/2003 6:40:48 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GotDangGenius
In the short time that I listened to him he said that he didn't have any need for a gun therefore there was no reason for me to have one. I have no need for O'Reilly.
43 posted on 05/26/2003 6:51:58 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: George W. Bush
Actually, there's no good reason even to hold state-sponsored proms to begin with. Let these kids have private parties or not have them. Keep the schools out of it; they're silly enough without holding proms.

Creative thinking.

45 posted on 05/26/2003 6:57:39 AM PDT by syriacus (If the NY Times is hiring a Jayson Blair replacement, Michael Moore could fill his boots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: David Isaac
...maybe he is not really all that bad either...

I forget where I read this: "'Not that bad' = 'Not that good'". I'm afraid that measuring O'Reilly against his competition is a false comparison - one dope vs. a bunch of Leftists. Back in 1999 or early 2000, when I heard him mindlessly repeating the Klingon administration's meaningless assertion that oil companies' profits were up 500% from the days of $10/barrel oil, he really turned me off. So I permanently returned the favor, and haven't missed him a bit. O'Reilly, Geraldo, Alan Colmes, and Regrettable Van Susteran are good evidence that Fox News is NOT a strictly conservative news channel.

46 posted on 05/26/2003 6:58:20 AM PDT by UpNAtEm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: oldconservative
What O'Reilly and Shapiro are upset about is something else altogether. For there is no evidence the white kids of Taylor County hate all their black classmates. A preference for socializing with one's own is not hatred. CYO dances used to be restricted to baptized Catholics. That didn't mean the priests and nuns hated all non-Catholics. The same is true for the Newman clubs and Hillel houses on college campuses. These clubs represent the desire of a group to socialize together. This is not racism. It is natural and normal, and there is nothing morally reprehensible about it.

This demonstrates to me beyond a shadow of doubt that Buchanen hates both Jews and Blacks, and probably gypsies and slovaks as well.

I'm not going to toss about the over-worked nazi label, because too many use it on non-socialists, and the heart of nazism is socialism (national socialism). I do NOT think Buchanen is a socialist, but I had no idea that Buchanen was such a hater.

To affirm the right of "association" is fine. But to claim that this white prom was not racially based is absurd. Segregation is the heart of racism. And I hate it for the way it twists the minds of our young.

Asbestos suit in place. Flame away.

47 posted on 05/26/2003 6:59:52 AM PDT by HatSteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suntsu
Perhaps the NAACP did some good things at one time. Now they are nothing more than the loudest racist voice of modern times . They are grounded in the platforms of communist ideology and have probably done more to undermine the integrity of our election process than any other organization. Every time one of their spokesmen opens his mouth, stupidity and hatred gushes out. I do not believe it is I who made the ignorant statement.
48 posted on 05/26/2003 6:59:57 AM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
I notice that Pat gets a lot of agreement on this thread. But let him talk about the loss of jobs to China and Mexico and he becomes a typhoid mary.
49 posted on 05/26/2003 7:20:42 AM PDT by Jason_b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe
If you hafta ask....
50 posted on 05/26/2003 7:24:05 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (There ought to be a law against excessive legislation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oldconservative
Hey Bill,
Tolerance means tolerating stuff you might not agree with. You might mention that to the homos and the Christologists.
51 posted on 05/26/2003 7:27:00 AM PDT by galt-jw (guess what? you've been had!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
O'Reilly's style is Mort Downy-esque, less the profanity and cigarettes. His guests are no more than sounding boards so that he may gloriy his intellectual prowess. But hey, he'll always give you the last word.
52 posted on 05/26/2003 7:45:06 AM PDT by Prolifeconservative (If there is another terrorist attack, the womb is a very unsafe place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
bttt
53 posted on 05/26/2003 7:53:37 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: oldconservative
A preference for socializing with one's own is not hatred.

It may not be hatred, but if by "one's own," you mean one's own race, then one is a racist.

My preference is for socializing with Conservatives who may be of various colors.

Pat continues to expose himself and it's not a pretty sight.

54 posted on 05/26/2003 8:27:19 AM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HatSteel
I don't know whether you'll consider this post to be a flame, but I think your statements showed an inability to reason and draw accurate conclusions from the evidence. We probably agree on many of the details surrounding this incident, but some of your conclusions are backwards.

This demonstrates to me beyond a shadow of doubt that Buchanen hates both Jews and Blacks, and probably gypsies and slovaks as well.

Pat Buchanan pointed out that religious groups have often restricted their activities to their own membership and that this action doesn't represent hatred. He makes a valid point, and you are trying to twist his making of that point into claiming that he hates blacks and Jews. Your little rant about the Roma and slovaks only shows your own prejudice against Mr. Buchanan. (Many of the Roma consider "gypsy" to be a racial slur against them. If you are going to play the racial sensitivity game, you need to avoid the use of racial slurs.) He says nothing that suggests a hatred towards anyone. His contempt is for the racism of political correctness and those who support it. From other comments that he's made in other places, I think he has an irrational dislike of the nation of Israel, but generalizing that flaw to a hatred of Jews is a stretch.

We don't know the racial make-up of this school or how their public prom was handled. If the entire public prom was done in a way that gave preferential treatment to blacks, I can understand some people wanting to hold a separate prom with more traditional themes. Rather than openly restrict the prom to whites only, I think they should have set the theme and made clear that they would tolerate no change to their choices in music, decoration, and other details. If blacks wanted to enjoy that kind of prom, they'd be welcome as well. However, if these people had tried and tried to reach reasonable compromises and received nothing but grief in return, I can understand their wanting simply to avoid the source of conflict. The truth is that we don't who did what or who was being unreasonable in this situation. Any guess we make on either side is just a guess based on our own prejudices.

Segregation is the heart of racism. And I hate it for the way it twists the minds of our young.

Again, you have it exactly backwards. Racism is the hatred and contempt that is one cause of people segregating. The separation doesn't cause the racism. The racism is one cause of segregation. Again, I don't think that all segregation is driven by racism. I've been romantically involved with a woman who was black, but I think most people are going to be predisposed to romantic relationships within their own race. Generally, that's my preference as well. I don't think this predisposition is evil or racist. I think people may segregate along racial lines when they feel that they are misunderstood by those outside their race. I don't think that all blacks who eat dinner only with other blacks at a school or work environment have hatred or animosity towards whites. Some do, but others are just gravitating towards their own. In a predominantly black school, I would guess that whites often do the same thing for the same reason. That segregation is not a cause of racism.

Like you, I hate racism for the way that it twists people's minds, but racism is only one of many lies that I hate for the same reason. Politicaly correctness is a similar lie that twists people's minds and needs to be opposed.

WFTR
Bill

55 posted on 05/26/2003 8:31:42 AM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: David Isaac
..." he should know definitly know that he has stuck his foot it it, as far as this one issue is concerned."

He found out just how far he'd stuck his foot in it when the poll he had on his wedsite showed that most people think the white kids had every right to have their own prom outside of the school. He tried to blame it on an attack by a neo-Nazi group. The poll was locked, and he said he would try to get it back up by the upcoming weekend so the polling could go on, but he never did. For a supposedly no-spin zone, Bill was spinning like crazy that night.

56 posted on 05/26/2003 8:32:02 AM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom
It's about the music, O'Reilly. Listening to 6 hours of 'rap crap' is hell, if you don't like it.

LOL! That was my thought, exactly.

57 posted on 05/26/2003 8:34:24 AM PDT by cgk (It is liberal dogma that human life is an accident - Linda Bowles (r.i.p.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tame
Cloud mag

Now that's hysterical.

58 posted on 05/26/2003 8:36:06 AM PDT by cgk (It is liberal dogma that human life is an accident - Linda Bowles (r.i.p.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
I fully agree. Although I think I'd rather listen to that than 6 hours or minutes of country music.
59 posted on 05/26/2003 9:12:25 AM PDT by College Repub (This classic rock/early 90s rock fan runs away fast from all the flames.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe
If only all the relationships Buchanan mentions in his article were as innocent as he describes. There's plenty of hate all around.

But unless it manifests itself in violence or descriminatory acts by the authorities government has no business intervening.

60 posted on 05/26/2003 9:16:49 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson