Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Hog That Saves the Grunts [A-10s To Be Decommissioned?]
The New York Times ^ | May 27, 2003 | Robert Coram

Posted on 05/27/2003 7:23:30 AM PDT by aculeus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: aculeus
A terrible shame if this happens. I was assigned to an A-10 squadron after Gulf War I. The most common "I Love Me" pictures I saw were of pilots with their arm wrapped lovingly around the cannon of the badly damaged Warthog that got them safely home. Sierra On-Line released a "A-10 Tank Killer" computer game about 10 years ago. The best part of it was the A-10 history that took up about half the manual.
41 posted on 05/27/2003 8:04:31 AM PDT by AF_Blue (Integrity, Service, Excellence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lepton
When I was there Aug 73-May 76 we used to hunt tornadoes on week ends. I've seen the video, kind of scary. I was in communications but our building like most everything else at McConnell was right on the flightline. Flyoffs were frequent because of the range and McConnell's huge runway.
42 posted on 05/27/2003 8:08:50 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (If you're looking for a friend, get a dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I once saw a 'hawg with the stenciled message:

Ugly, But Well Hung

Now that's attitude!

43 posted on 05/27/2003 8:10:36 AM PDT by Jonah Hex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Perhaps the Army can get a friend in the Congress to transfer all the A-10's and A-10 support equipment to the Army

That would be a violation of the Interservice Agreement between the Army and Air Force. In it the Army agreed not to get involved in fixed wing aviation ( with rare exception) and the Air Force agreed not to do rotary wing ( ditto). I know, I know it's stupid of the air force to try and get rid of the A 10's. What congress COULD do is mate spending for the Air Force's hot projects like the F-22 Raptor to continued deployment of the A-10.
44 posted on 05/27/2003 8:12:04 AM PDT by Kozak (" No mans life liberty or property is safe when the legislature is in session." Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Oh god, are there STILL supporters of the A-16 idea out there?
Let the USAF decommission the A-10 and promptly give the squadrons to the Army.
At least they have proper appreciation for CAS.
45 posted on 05/27/2003 8:12:50 AM PDT by Saturnalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Where do I buy mine?
46 posted on 05/27/2003 8:13:49 AM PDT by uncbuck ("Lady, I'm not an athlete, I'm a baseball player." -- John Kruk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Yes its illusionary to wish for, but the Hogs need to be transferred to an Army Air-Corp.

That would certainly make the Air Force scream. However, they discarded the old name, so "U.S. Army Air Corps." is the logical name for Army aviation. This might be a good time to float the idea, too - "retro" is "in".

An updated version of the A-10 might be something to consider, but the F-35 ain't it. The designers can look at all the battle damage data from the two Gulf Wars and correct any weaknesses exposed by that enemy fire. While they're at it, make the new version with a 2-up cockpit, like the F-15E Strike Eagle. Let the pilot concentrate on flying and engaging the enemy with the gun, while the co-pilot (both should have full flight controls and instruments) handles the other weapons systems and anti-SAM countermeasures.

Such a 2-place design would make the aircraft even more lethal and better able to survive in the hostile environment that is close air support.

47 posted on 05/27/2003 8:17:18 AM PDT by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
NOOOOOOOOOOO!
48 posted on 05/27/2003 8:17:36 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Isn't that the damned truth. We still utilize equipment from the Korean War and make it work!!!! The Air Force is supposed to be the smartest branch out there?? FIGURE IT OUT!!!!!
49 posted on 05/27/2003 8:18:29 AM PDT by AbsoluteJustice (Kiss me I'm an INFIDEL!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
An understatement along the lines of saying Stainman had problems with the truth. It packs the GAU-8 Avenger, the most powerful gun ever put on an airplane. It fires depleted uranium shells too, which further annoys lefties. Another reason to keep it active. >:)

By the way that GAU 8 is available as a pod mounted armament as well. My F-4 squadron used to mount one on the centerline hard point. At the range we would be hosing both 30 and 20 mm DU shells. In Fact there are pictures of an F-4 with 3 of the Gau 8 pods mounted, one on the center and one on each wing. Rumor has it that when THAT combo fired the crew could feel the plane DECELERATE from all the reaction mass hosing out of the front. THAT would be one mean tank buster!
50 posted on 05/27/2003 8:19:34 AM PDT by Kozak (" No mans life liberty or property is safe when the legislature is in session." Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
the A-10 will be moved to the Marines, they'll never give it up
51 posted on 05/27/2003 8:19:40 AM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine; Blood of Tyrants; 1stFreedom; cpdiii
After the war, the Army told the AF that is they dropped the A-10s the Army would seek to take them over and operate them themselves. This caused the AF to reconsider (Wimp Out).

The AF was more than willing to give the Hog to the Army, the problem came when the Army demanded the Force structure (manning), Maintenace, and support structure to go along with the planes. If it would have just been the planes (w/o pilot), it probably would have been a done deal.

52 posted on 05/27/2003 8:21:52 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
While they are at it they should give the AC-130 attack craft (Specter) to the army also

The AF may own the AC-130, but it doesn't control them. They are controlled by the Special Operations Command (SOCCOM). So it wouldn't matter if the Army got them.

53 posted on 05/27/2003 8:25:02 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine
I expect the same thing to happen again.

Me too. Occasionally common sense does prevail. The plane is simply too practical to be disposed of. The Marines keep doing the same thing with their AH-1 Cobras. "They are too old we have to get rid of them.....but they work great so let's keep 'em."
54 posted on 05/27/2003 8:28:48 AM PDT by AdA$tra (Tagline maintenance in progress......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I think you'll start seeing UAV close air support. We don't much like POWs and although hogs can take a licking they're still subject to shoulder fired AA.
55 posted on 05/27/2003 8:31:53 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine's brother (MrConfettiman was in the streets while I was still yelling at the TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D. Brian Carter
I saw an A-10 doing a full acrobatic routine over the lakefront in Milwaukee last summer. The plane and its pilot were awesome. I had no idea that aircraft was so maneuverable. It was doing acrobatics I thought only the Blue Angles could do. The AF is nuts if it mothballs the A-10.
56 posted on 05/27/2003 8:35:04 AM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: D. Brian Carter
I agree. I have never thought it was an ugly plane.
57 posted on 05/27/2003 8:35:13 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Perhaps the Army can get a friend in the Congress to transfer all the A-10's and A-10 support equipment to the Army.I was going to suggest the same about the Marine Corps. That's where they belong. Air Force dudes ain't got the same grunt mentality as the grunt services.
58 posted on 05/27/2003 8:36:00 AM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I always like the A-10. Old, ugly, and slow (like me, but with wings) it sure has been a workhorse and quite a success for a plane that was supposedly obsolete before it left the drawing board.

I fell in love with it during the battle of Al Khafji and the aftermath, as it saved many allied lives, most likely including mine.

59 posted on 05/27/2003 8:36:56 AM PDT by Feckless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT
Wow, you saw an A-10 do aerobatic manuevers that you didn't know were possible. Now you make the assertion that the AF is nuts if it mothballs the A-10. You sound like a real expert on the subject.
60 posted on 05/27/2003 8:38:06 AM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace ((the original))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson