[Theodore R.]

This is the data that Susan Collins used to issue her recent denunciation of "McCarthyism." She did not read the real story.

[T'wit]

Talk about a reliable source -- Stan Evans is a top expert on the case. Glad to see him turning over a few more rotten liberal logs for us.

[Jack Black]

ping

[Stultis]

these 4,000-plus pages of closed-door sessions contain a lot of added information and should be a great resource for scholars. Assuming, that is, that anyone actually bothers to read them

Someone did:

[Gritty]

... (Ft.) Monmouth was a security sieve. This was a matter of great importance, as the complex of laboratories there and related industrial outfits were engaged in top-secret projects... Security should have been tight in such a set-up, but all too obviously it wasn’t... As the McCarthy sessions showed, there had long been no effective system for keeping track of confidential papers, and people had been routinely allowed to take such documents off the premises. These conditions were the more disturbing as Monmouth and related labs had been a scene of action for convicted Communist agents Julius Rosenberg and Morton Sobell....

Why am I so reminded of the Los Alamos Labs and Wen Ho Lee in the 1990s under the tutelage of Hazel O'Leary and bill clinton?

Where is Joe McCarthy when you need him?

[Anti-Bubba182]

Ping to old thread. M. Stanton Evans on C-Span2 now.