Posted on 05/28/2003 1:23:02 PM PDT by MalcolmS
Imagine that you’ve decided to build a house in a particular area. You’re willing to invest the money, time and effort to make something that will last a lifetime. You want to move in and make it your own. But as you drive through the neighborhood, you notice something is desperately wrong. Some houses look sound, but many others are sagging—perhaps they are houses divided against themselves. But most disturbingly, over half of the houses in this vast subdivision have been completely destroyed. They are collapsed, burnt-out shells that leave the impression of a village in Kosovo after a bout of vicious ethnic cleansing. You imagine the suffering of those who once lived in those homes, and you wonder, do I really want to move here? That’s the question faced by Americans when they consider moving to the USA’s 51st state—the state of matrimony. Do I really want to move here? It looks like a bad neighborhood. The US leads G8 Nations in divorce, and is in statistical tie with Sweden for the world’s divorce title. The US rate is over 25% higher than the number-two contender, Russia. Strangely, it’s almost 50% higher than Canada, a country with a culture that many others in the world see as almost indistinguishable from that of the USA. Other Reference Nations (Source: www.divorcereform.org) The economic costs are high. Statistically, women & children are hardest hit, and often end up struggling to get by. That’s not to say that divorced men don’t take an economic hit too. It’s a lose-lose proposition. Some argue that divorce is a major cause of poverty in America. That doesn’t count the emotional costs, such as the fact that millions of children grow up without their fathers as a significant presence in their lives. On the flip side, married men and women are statistically more likely to live longer, happier, healthier and wealthier lives. Given all this, you have to wonder about America’s future as the impact of a divorce culture generates a cumulative effect on future generations. It also begs the question, why is the American divorce rate so high? Some would blame it on America’s cultural center of gravity. Hollywood is a place where marriages must be measured, like a baby’s age, in months in order for anyone to have a 25th “anniversary”. Could it be that American men so much worse than than men around the world? It’s hard to believe American men are worse than, for example, the French. Maybe American women have unrealistically high expectations of marriage. Perhaps it’s just too easy to get a divorce. Maybe it’s an unexpected side-effect of the feminist movement. I really don't know. (What do you think? Take the poll below.) But regardless of why, how should we address the problem? Countries with low divorce rates, like Switzerland and Japan, might provide hints. Switzerland, despite being a developed, western country, has a divorce rate less than half that of the USA. One unique aspect of Swiss life is the community pressure to conform that keeps the country running like, well, a Swiss clock. This pressure dictates all sorts of social behavior, from when you shop (even “convenience” stores are open just one evening a week) to the disapproval expressed if your car is more than three-years old. There is also disapproval if you divorce. Japan is also famous for the social pressures to conform. Historically, one undeniable part of that pressure is for women to marry young and to stay married. Now this kind of repressive peer pressure would not “take” in America, whose strength lies in its almost chaotic freedom. Indeed, it is that freedom that inspires the energetic entrepreneurial engine that supports the American economy. As late as the 1960’s, divorce was indeed stigmatized in America. But divorce was frowned upon even when one spouse was escaping infidelity, alcoholism or abuse. That kind of negative peer pressure is not the answer. Society now does not criticize divorce. But has society gone so far that it cares little if your marriage succeeds? America needs cheerleaders for marriage, and coaches too. I believe there is a way to exert positive peer pressure in this one area. So here’s a proposal. Committed married couples should befriend and mentor engaged couples. They should counsel and encourage them before they are married. They should prepare them for the issues that they will face over their lifetimes. And most of all, they should encourage a sense of accountability—a sense that someone truly wants their marriage to succeed, is pulling for them, and will be disappointed if they fail. That’s the kind of positive peer pressure that can help America lose the one championship it never really wanted. Malcolm B. Stephens is a co-author of the book Knowing Me, Knowing You: A Multiple-Choice Quiz for Engaged Couples. This book helps couples to get to know each other’s beliefs, pet peeves and expectations in preparation for married life.Divorce Rates in G8 Nations (per 100 Marriages)
USA
54.8
Russia
43.4
UK
42.6
Germany
39.4
France
38.3
Canada
37
Italy
10
Japan
1.9
Switerland
25.5
Sweden
54.9
This book was featured on Dr. Laura yesterday and has zoomed up in the Amazon rankings. At last check it was ranked no. 79 and gunning for Living History at no. 35.
It was written by a certain FR member's wife, and he helped enough to be graciously granted co-author status (blush).
If you have a minute, please visit the site to answer the poll question (sorry, it's not a live poll), or post your opinion below.
1. You accidently married a shrew
2. She jumped from 120 to 230lbs in less than a year and won't get off her @$$ to do anything about it.
3. She asks your opinions but does whatever the hell she wants anyway.
4. She invites her liberal democrat mom over to stay for weeks at a time
5. Everytime you leave the house to go to Home Depot she snidely asks, "Going to see your girlfriend again?"
Uh, at least that's what I've heard can happen...
That's true. Basically the statistics are reported as divorces per 1000 people or divorces per 100 marriages. I thought the per 100 marriages gave a better idea of one's chances for success. As far as I can tell, few if any countries capture statistics for living-together followed by break up rates for cohabitators. (ie. they may capture cohabitation rates, but not breakups.)
Sweden is quite badly off however. They have many people living together, relatively few marriages, and still a high divorce rate.
The Marriage Project at Rutgers reports that a pattern of cohabitation significantly reduces your chances for sucess in maintaining a marriage.
AFFLUENCE
Because we can afford to be.
Divorce is facilitated by afluance.
If others could afford it, they would.
So9
I don't think that's the answer. Most of them are lesbians anyway.
But I do think the answer is quite simple -- Jerry Springer.
LOL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.