Right-wing control leaves no reason for rejoicing

YOUR TURN

by B.J. Paschal, professor emeritus of psychology

May 29, 2003

Some of my Taliban Republican critics take great pride in telling me that Benjamin Franklin urged the delegates of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 to open their sessions with morning prayers.

But they fail to mention that the records show that the delegates refused to even debate the issue.

I usually ask them if they have read Franklin's statement about the proposed Constitution (which was adopted). Of course, he prophesied that this effort would fail: "There is no form of government but what may be a blessing to the people if well administered, and I believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in despotism, as other forms have done before it, when people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government, being incapable of any other."

The oil industry (including gas) has hijacked our government -- all three branches from presidency to Congress to the Supreme Court. The means have always been there as Franklin warned. It simply took greed plus ideology as the unifying umbrella, but the glue of the movement is delivering concrete rewards -- usually money -- to core constituencies.

Think of Enron, Wall Street, the hierarchy of the U.S. Roman Catholic Church, William Bennett; of Justice Scalia's son arguing before his unrecused father at the Supreme Court while unrecused Thomas sits silently by, his wife already at work for the approaching Bush government.

Think of the electoral college -- a piece of anti-democratic machinery -- that Franklin must have seen as a source of deepest corruption for the new Republic, as occurred in both 1876 and 2000.

Think, finally, of Scalia's son and Thomas' wife working for the Bush team as the supremes decided to leave votes uncounted in the 5-4 Bush vs. Gore political decision, a decision that most people were afraid to call by its correct name -- treason.

Before leaving Franklin's statement about "form of government," let us be cognizant of one of the prime facts of history: The market economy, like every other social order knowable to man or woman, liberates some of us in some ways, and enslaves some of us in other ways.

If it should turn out to be the only viable order in an ever more integrated, culturally homogeneous world, that would be no good reason either for rejoicing or despair.

Finally, there is no good reason for rejoicing about the Patriot Act which takes aim at the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and probably Eighth Amendments. This Bush-Ashcroft attack on the Bill of Rights was opposed by only one senator and 66 representatives. These members of Congress are the only patriots in Washington.

p.s. Will the Republican-owned media even allow a presidential election in 2004?

A number of his writings can be found online. Here is a letter to the editor he wrote:

B.J. PASCHAL - Muncie

Here are a few of my favorite signs from recent anti-war marches:

"How many lives per gallon?"

"Who would Jesus bomb?"

"Pre-emptive Impeachment."

"War is not a family value."

"Draft Richard Perle."

"The true meaning of anything Bush says is connotative."

My favorite Bush metaphor is "oceans," which he has used about 40 times in the past 7 months, so I've been told by a friend. That is, we're "vulnerable" that today Bush himself is our only protection from our enemies; he's our "oceans." Aren't "oceans" an antiquated defense?

I'd rather have Jesus!

http://www.thestarpress.com/tsp/opinion/03/apr/0405LetterUSESOONprotestsigns.php

"Think of the electoral college -- a piece of anti-democratic machinery -- that Franklin must have seen as a source of deepest corruption for the new Republic, as occurred in both 1876 and 2000."

Yeah. What corruption for flyover country to deny the big cities on the coasts from dominating the 2000 election. What's his beef? Did President Bush really lose the election or did he win because the electoral college itself is a bad system?

Algore Junior only received 0.52% more of the popular vote and that is without investigations into voting irregularities or waiting for all mail-in ballots to arrive (some states were not in contention and did not need to wait 2 weeks to certify their returns).

Let's get rid of Rhode Island's representation in Congress altogether, that's not really a state, why should their citizens get as much say in the Senate as Californians? < /sarcasm >

There's too many lies amd indications of boorish ignorance to count here.

Start with "the 5-4 Bush vs. Gore political decision" (it was a 7-2 decision), move onto "Think of the electoral college -- a piece of anti-democratic machinery -- that Franklin must have seen as a source of deepest corruption..." (Really? That's what "Franklin must have seen"? How about this: the Constitution would never have been adopted without the protection afforded to states by the electoral college? How about studying basic high school history before making a jackass out of yourself, BJ?) and what you have here is a pathetic, poorly researched whine from an idiot of a sore loser.

See ya on another thread!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.