Replies

After my explanation to you Chad over this issue earlier, tell me you aren't still spinning the same song, because if you are you are not dealing with how things really work.

They have only his family getting access and her families stuff is being gone through by them and could even come up missing by the time anything would go to a family court.
In addition, it would cost them tens of thousands to even pursue the issue. They are not all made out of money, if they were they could all play in court.

The way it works is if they go to court now, they have to be taken in which is cheaper for them and they would get to keep the stuff.

This guy was selling her car before she was declared dead, that wasn't ethical either.
If he ends up guilty, that to wasn't all that ethical.

Trying to avoid court and giving lawyers unneeded money of theirs was the most ethical thing to this day involved in this whole murder.

After my explanation to you Chad over this issue earlier, tell me you aren't still spinning the same song, because if you are you are not dealing with how things really work.

I know how things really work, just don't LIKE how things work, sometimes.

They have only his family getting access and her families stuff is being gone through by them and could even come up missing by the time anything would go to a family court.

In addition, it would cost them tens of thousands to even pursue the issue. They are not all made out of money, if they were they could all play in court.

You must have me mixed up with someone who gives a rip about hurt feelings and closure and other psychobabble. I Do, however, care about the rule of law...

The way it works is if they go to court now, they have to be taken in which is cheaper for them and they would get to keep the stuff.

I hate it when the law inconveniences me, and makes things more expensive for me - I really do. But maybe I have too much Honesty and Integrity (and that Humbleness I mentioned earlier...) in me. Call it a character flaw ;0)

This guy was selling her car before she was declared dead, that wasn't ethical either. If he ends up guilty, that to wasn't all that ethical.

Certainly. No disagreement there. I think I've mae my opinion about Scott's Character (or lack thereof) abundantely clear... :0)

Trying to avoid court and giving lawyers unneeded money of theirs was the most ethical thing to this day involved in this whole murder.

There I don't agree. Wish I could, but my own character flaws preclude me from doing so...

Here's a post I had earlier on this that you may find of interest.#386

The Rochas had prior access to the property and the keys. Petersons needed to file the necessary legal papers to legally prevent the Rochas from entering the property and schedule a hearing. TRO, people do it everyday to prevent the other party from entering the premises. Geragos dropped the ball and the Rochas were within their legal rights. They stole nothing as everything taken was reported to the officer on scene and the attorneys.