Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
From 'Why did he?' to 'Did he?' in 28 days

By Harriet Ryan

Court TV

A few days after he took Scott Peterson's case, defense lawyer Mark Geragos stood on the steps of the Stanislaus County courthouse surrounded by his new client's family and predicted public opinion of the murder suspect was about to change.

"I think it's only a matter of time before we're able to turn America's head around," Geragos told scores of reporters eager to gobble up any speck of information about Peterson and the killing of his pregnant wife, Laci, and unborn son.

At the time, Geragos' forecast seemed about as likely as June snow in Modesto. In the hot, dry California city and across the nation, Peterson was Public Enemy #1. When he was arrested, a throng of angry citizens greeted his arrival at the county jail with bloodthirsty chants and signs reading MURDERER. The front page of the New York Post showed Peterson in shackles beneath the headline "MONSTER IN CHAINS." And the California attorney general pronounced the case against Peterson "a slam dunk."

But in the 28 days since Geragos became Peterson's attorney, an improbable, but unmistakable shift in the public discussion of the crime has occurred. The question is no longer "How could he do it?" but "Did he do it?"

The change seems clearly the result of a series of press leaks — some directly credited to the defense side and others to unspecified sources — including speculation that Laci Peterson died at the hands of a Satanic cult and Thursday's revelation by MSNBC that the coroner found a plastic tape "noose" around the neck of the Petersons' unborn son, Conner, when his body was found on the eastern shore of the San Francisco Bay.

Excerpted

17 posted on 06/02/2003 6:01:23 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: runningbear; All
Did anyone catch geraldo's "Breaking News -- Fox News Alert" last evening? It was the most pathetic stunt I have ever seen and it is harmful to Fox. If you can believe it, the "breaking news" was that geragos claims that the leaks did not come from the defense. Earth to Fox and to geraldo: That is not news! That is a claim, and most probably a false claim at best. That was it; I will never turn on geraldo ever again. He is right up geragos' ass, as most of us thought he would be. Fox: you are letting him get away with it! geraldo is aiding geragos in making a circus act out of this travesty. Fox's coverage should be directed to helping to bring justice to Laci & Connor & the Rocha Family -- not lies, innuendos and injustice! I am flaming made! Fox had better get a grip on geraldo and what they pass for "breaking news" because geraldo is casting a very negative "tabloid news mag" light on them. Shame on geraldo, geragos & his hack lawyers and staff and every one of the peterson's.
82 posted on 06/02/2003 8:30:20 AM PDT by Donna Lee Nardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: runningbear
The new attorney is doing all he can to cast doubt. But there is no doubt that "Satan" did it.
198 posted on 06/02/2003 2:14:33 PM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson