[unspun]

Of course. It's useful for answering questions about why things are the way they are. What could be more useful than beating back the borders of ignorance?

Well, since utility is a matter for objectivity, can you relate instances?

(Keep in mind, that I'm not talking about open minded research of life sciences and origins, within the eschatological boundaries of theoretics, 'forensics,' and the modicum of actual science involved. I'm talking about Darwinism the ideology masquerading as science, not intellectually honest engagement to actually ascertain what we can make of the various elements of evolution and creation theories.)

[general_re]

Well, since utility is a matter for objectivity, can you relate instances?

Is knowing why mitochondria have their own DNA better than remaining ignorant about the matter?

I'm talking about Darwinism the ideology masquerading as science, not intellectually honest engagement to actually ascertain what we can make of the various elements of evolution and creation theories.)

Your turn - got any specific instances of what you wish to dispute here?