Posted on 06/04/2003 8:49:20 AM PDT by Constitution Day
U.S. Rep. Richard Burr officially has filed as a candidate for the U.S. Senate.
Burr, R-5th District, filed a statement of candidacy for the Senate on March 3 with the Secretary of the Senate in the Office of Public Information in the Senate, which forwarded the filing to the Federal Elections Commission the same day.
"I have done everything short of making a formal announcement," Burr told a Telegram reporter on Tuesday. "I have even closed my House (campaign finance) account."
Raymond Davis, a campaign specialist in the Senate Office of Public Records, said Burr, 47, filed a 127-page campaign report on April 15 for the first quarter of 2003.
The Senate public records office later received a 127-page U.S. House committee termination report stamped May 6, confirming that Burr has closed his House finance committee, Davis said.
Campaign finance reports filed with the Federal Elections Commission name Burr's Senate committee, based in Winston-Salem, as the Richard Burr Committee. The report also states that the committee has nearly $2.1 million.
"I think that we can conclude that from that I am running for the U.S. Senate," Burr said.
Campaigning last Wednesday at a private gathering sponsored by N.C. Rep. Bill Daughtridge, R-Nash, at Rose Hill Farm outside Nashville, Burr criticized U.S. Rep. John Edwards, R-N.C., for spending too much time campaigning for the presidency and not being in Washington, D.C., during critical votes.
"John Edwards seems to have forgotten where he's come from," he said.
Burr said the decision to run for the Senate was an easy one, because he had promised his constituents he would not run for more than five terms in the U.S. House. Now, he said, he wants to take his experience to the Senate so he can continue serving North Carolina.
The White House has urged Burr to run for the Senate, which he said is a great honor and also an incredible responsibility.
"There are expectations that go with it," Burr said. "The White House will not tell you what to do, but they aren't shy about calling and seeing how you are doing."
Burr, who is the vice chairman of the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce, said it was important to increase the Republican advantage in the Senate to eliminate gridlock and pass legislation.
"We had a 51-49 majority in the Senate, and it still took the vice president to cast the tie-breaking vote for the tax cut," he said. "We can't get the Senate to take up a prescription drug plan for seniors. The Senate won't take it up for the fourth time in a row, after the House again passed it."
While Burr said it was an advantage to begin campaigning nearly 11 months before the state primary because he could do things at his own pace, he said there was a danger.
"We're so far out from the election that people can forget about you," he said.
Burr said he has not officially declared his candidacy because of outside factors.
"It's tough for me to make a formal announcement, because I think that is matter of timing," he said. "We anticipate a formal announcement in late summer or early fall."
The filing period for candidates in North Carolina begins in February.
There is little mystery why U.S. Rep. Richard Burr has become the hottest commodity in the North Carolina Republican Party -- the White House's choice for the Senate seat held by Democrat John Edwards.Go, Richard, Go!Burr, a 47-year-old Winston-Salem resident, is bright enough to master the intricacies of national health-care policy, funny enough to trade quips with radio host Don Imus, and charming enough to sell his political views the way he once sold microwaves. With the endorsement of party elders ranging from former Sen. Jesse Helms to former Gov. Jim Martin, Burr is making a strong effort to lock up the GOP Senate nomination 20 months before the 2004 election. "I think Richard Burr is a new generation of Republican," said Ed Gillespie, a Republican strategist in Washington who was heavily involved in President Bush's and Sen. Elizabeth Dole's most recent campaigns. "He is a mainstream conservative when it comes to taxes and national security issues. But it is very hard to make him scary to moderates and swing voters and suburban women. He doesn't polarize."
I'm just saying.
"There are expectations that go with it," Burr said. "The White House will not tell you what to do, but they aren't shy about calling and seeing how you are doing."
Read: They won't tell you what to do, but they will slyly suggest that you tow the party line once in office, even if it means selling out your own constituency
LOL!
That's fine with me; Sean Connery made the absolute best James Bond anyway.
Burr has a 2002 ACU rating of 96 and a lifetime rating of 91.
Not as good as Helms was, but I doubt we'll ever see another one like him.
I'm waiting to see what they will give your favorite Senator next year. :)
Ah, but he voted against this bill. Now the question is did he vote against the bill because he didn't believe pilots should be armed or did he vote against the bill because he believed pilots shouldn't be armed as federal officials (government intrusion)?
And you're right, we will never see another Helms, and I don't even want to think about what you know who will get on this. Can they rank negative numbers?
No, they don't give negatives (LOL) but note Eva Clayton (my former Congresscritter, replaced by Ballance).
She got a big fat GOOSE EGG in '01 and '02.
Plus, she came across as a total moron.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.