[Woahhs]

It proves that a person with XY can still be a woman.

That was never at issue, or even questioned, and you know it. You are simply dissembling now as it must have finally seeped into you mind that Jamie Lee Curtis example does more to DISPROVE your contention than support it. Even though she's genetically male, she still functions as a woman. Exactly opposite your original contentions.

So what am I suppose to refute about the URL you posted?

[Paul C. Jesup]

That was never at issue, or even questioned, and you know it. You are simply dissembling now as it must have finally seeped into you mind that Jamie Lee Curtis example does more to DISPROVE your contention than support it. Even though she's genetically male, she still functions as a woman. Exactly opposite your original contentions.

That statement above makes absolutely NO sense. It is complete double-talk/word salad.

So what am I suppose to refute about the URL you posted?

Go to the website, read it and point out what you disagree with it.