Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Robin Hood Was Not A Democrat
CNSNews.com ^ | June 05, 2003 | Ron Marr

Posted on 06/05/2003 8:18:30 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

If you believe the hyperbole spouting from the spin doctors of the Democratic party, the agenda of leftist leadership involves taking from the rich and giving to the poor. Tax cuts benefit the wealthy, they say. Heartless conservatives have no compassion for the lowest strata of society, they cry. Our goal is to help the helpless, to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable, they rant.

They - meaning the leaders of the Democratic Party -- would have you believe their preferred attire consists of forest-green leotards woven from the naturally-shed coats of talking goats.

They purport to reside within the comforting arms of old-growth Sherwood Forest, where ax blades are magically prohibited from touching the bark of psychic trees. They claim to care nothing for themselves, but are willing to give everything for their fellow man. Their battle, under the standard of unvarnished altruism, is to free "the people" from the evil embrace of the Nottingham Republicans.

Hogwash. The most comfortable, most elite, most caste-driven sub-culture in America consists of high ranking, celebrity Democrats.

The poor are their pawns - useful tools to whom them throw gristle and moldy bones in return for votes. Though the Democrat ruse is to convince low wage earners and the voluntarily unemployed that refuse from their tables is but a sample of the gourmet meal to come, such is a bald-faced lie. They have no intention of ever providing anything but the most meager of rations.

The reason? The vision of the left is to foster false hope and create inescapable dependency. They wish to make the poor reliant, to position themselves as heroes of the common man. Their theology has far more in common with a noble/serf relationship than it does with helping one free themselves from the chains of poverty.

They have been following this path since the 60's -- beginning with Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society" debacle. The result has been more poverty, more crime, more hopelessness, more division between the races.

And there, gentle reader, is the entire Democratic strategy. It lies in one simple word - division. In direct opposition to the teachings of Martin Luther King, a wise man whom the left publicly idolizes while trampling the ideals he championed, Democratic planners do not seek a color-blind society of equals able to freely follow their dreams.

Instead, they fight to widen the divide between black and white, men and women, rich and poor. With near every speech they fan the flames of hatred. Again, they use the poor as pawns, telling them that they deserve something for nothing, that they are being used and abused, that the rewards of another's honest labor is rightfully theirs.

The poor are being used and abused - no argument - but it is the Democrat Machiavellis who are doing the using and abusing.

The left's reaction to the Bush tax cut is an obvious example of this class warfare. Tom Daschle appears on TV, speaking of the myriad citizens who will be hurt by tax relief. Grinning like a Cheshire, he barely contains his glee at the opportunity to label the Bush
Administration as uncaring. While speaking of the largesse that would go to the rich (aka; those with jobs) and the necessities stolen from the poor, there is something Tiny Tom forgets to mention.

The only people who receive a tax break are those who pay taxes. Daschle and company, unbelievably, are complaining that the tax break is not applied to those who DON'T pay taxes. They want more money for those who DON'T contribute, who live off the crusts and crumbs they dribble out in return for support of the Donkey Party.

You see, Democrats hate the idea of programs that benefit the average working family or the average small business owner. They are against legislation that helps the individual get a bit ahead of the game. They have a visceral reaction to capitalism in general,
preferring a Socialist state bereft of progress and incentive.

Their dream is that of mass dependency, for such a Utopia would allow them to stay in power and amass greater personal fortune. Odd how the most odious oppressors tend too paint themselves as caring liberators.

Sadly, those already dependent upon government hand-outs, who have little hope, will continue to buy the myth of Democrats as latter-day Robin Hoods. Sadly, they have yet to realize that the Merry Men of the left have filed a change of address.

They now lounge within the highest tower of the most opulent castle, jingling their coins and laughing at the peons below who beg for their scraps.

Elvis has left the building.

Robin Hood has left the forest.

(Ron Marr is the founder of The Trout Wrapper, the official magazine of Montana's Tobacco Root Mountains. The publication believes in "big guns, big dogs and big bar tabs." Founded in 1994, The Trout Wrapper says it is "dedicated to hunting down and publicly tormenting the humor impaired," and it espouses the "wholesale abuse of all things politically correct.")






TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/05/2003 8:18:30 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
People always get Robin Hood wrong because if your remember the story he took from the tax collector.... ”the rich” were the king an other local royalty who were taxing the commoner “the poor” to death
2 posted on 06/05/2003 8:27:08 AM PDT by tophat9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
I wonder what the actual tax rates that the king was charging were. Probably less than we are being required to pay now.
3 posted on 06/05/2003 8:33:21 AM PDT by Bob Buchholz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
Your one sentence is straight to the point. Thank you.

If you hadn't posted your summary then the whole story was lost on me.




Robin Hood took from the tax collector.... ”the rich” were the king and other local royalty who were taxing the commoner “the poor” to death.




Let's repeat this over and over.
4 posted on 06/05/2003 8:34:33 AM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
Exactly...and depending on what tale you listen to, Robin Hood's father was a wealthy land owner who had his land confiscated and was killed by the King's men (the government).
5 posted on 06/05/2003 8:41:18 AM PDT by cwb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
The most comfortable, most elite, most caste-driven sub-culture in America consists of high ranking, celebrity Democrats.

Machiavellian monsters dressed as Robin Hood describes Democratic politicians well.

Don't hurt those that cannot hurt you." -- Machiavelli

6 posted on 06/05/2003 8:47:04 AM PDT by thinktwice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
I think your identifying "the rich" as the government is important, but the corruption of the morality tale goes beyond even that. He stole from those who stole the wealth and returned it to those who earned it.
7 posted on 06/05/2003 9:00:50 AM PDT by blanknoone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone
Yes, he was NOT a socialist but a guerrilla leader in either:
1. an ethnic war against an occupying army.
2. a loyal defender of the true government against a conniving usurper.

Depends on the teller of the tale.


8 posted on 06/05/2003 9:11:54 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
Well said. It is a subtle point that is often lost on people. Robin Hood is actually a rebel against the tax collector, and those who illegally assume power. I've noticed, many people get the wrong message out of "A Christmas Carol" too.
9 posted on 06/05/2003 9:36:47 AM PDT by TheDon ( It is as difficult to provoke the United States as it is to survive its eventual and tardy response)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
"the agenda of leftist leadership involves taking from the rich and giving to the poor"

With this statement, I'm reminded of Streisand's palatial Malibu mansion or Bill Gates' 4-year old island mansion. And I ask myself did these people take from themselves and give to the poor? The answer is an unequivocal NO because these people are still living in these palaces of the rich and famous and the poor is still out there.
10 posted on 06/05/2003 12:04:28 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
" they fight to widen the divide between black and white, men and women, rich and poor"

I would add, 'between heterosexual and homosexual' and 'religious and nonreligious'


11 posted on 06/05/2003 3:40:59 PM PDT by Susannah (Veterans...the most treasured and endangered ones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
The next round of tax cuts should be called the "Robin Hood Tax Cuts".
12 posted on 06/05/2003 6:49:34 PM PDT by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson