Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'The Real Deal' on Hillary & Media Double Standard (Scarborough Country - Ann Coulter)
Scarborough Country (MSNBC) ^ | 6-10-03 | Joe Scarborough

Posted on 06/10/2003 1:32:56 PM PDT by cgk

‘The Real Deal’ on Hillary and media double standard
 
Puff piece interviews, instead of tough questions   Image: Hillary Clinton Book
Richard Fullam, of Boston Mass., passes by a display of Hillary Rodham Clinton's new book "Living History" at a Barnes and Noble in New York after purchasing the book shortly after midnight Monday.
 
COMMENTARY
by Joe Scarborough
June 10 —  Put on your bibs. The media has kicked off the Hillary love-fest summer tour, and it’s already getting sickly sweet. If you want to hear some of the questions Barbara and the press didn’t have the guts to ask, it’s time for the Real Deal.

       HILLARY CLINTON GOT paid $8 million by media conglomerate Viacom to put her life’s story into print. Aided by three ghostwriters and a lapdog press, the New York senator is sure to sell a ton of books and rake in even more money.
       Today, the Associated Press likened Hillary Clinton to a rock star. And last night, Barbara Walters was too busy drooling over the former first lady to at least pretend she had once been a trailblazing journalist herself. Maybe that’s why Ms. Walters didn’t ask Hillary why it was okay to rake in $8 million from Viacom, when Mr. Gingrich got neutered for making less than half of that sum.
       I think Americans would have really liked to know why Democrats get fawning praise for million dollar book deals, while Republicans get ethic charges and vicious press attacks. And how Ms. Walters just let Hillary off the hook when she had the nerve to say that she and Bill never did anything wrong? Or how the Paula Jones matter was all a lie that was dismissed in court?
       Dismissed? Nothing to it? What about the lawsuit that ended in an $850,000 settlement? What about Bill Clinton’s disbarment? And how does Hillary quickly brush off any questions about Gennifer Flowers as private, but sells books by going into great detail about Monica Lewinsky? Hey, Barbara…even you should have caught that one.
       Maybe America wanted a People magazine puff piece beamed into their homes last night. That’s fine. But now that the ABC fan club has had their day in the sun, how about real journalists wading into the fray and asking tough questions about, say, Viacom paying a United States senator $8 million dollars while they have critically important pending business before Congress.
       Maybe Viacom-owned CBS news should raise those questions first. God knows they did when a Republican speaker made much less on his own his book deal a few years back.
       It’s not just about Hillary. It’s about big media’s double standard. It’s not right, and it’s tonight’s Real Deal.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; doublestandards; hillaryclinton; joescarborough; liberalmedia; livinghistory; mediabias; newtgingrich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Transcript with Joe, Ann Coulter and Hillary's former press secretary:

SCARBOROUGH: Now, tonight, topics on Hillary Clinton include Bill’s many affairs, Hillary’s take on the vast right-wing conspiracy, and the innocent victims of the political machine of the Clintons. With me now is former Clinton press secretary Hillary-to Hillary Clinton, Karen Finney. She’s back for a second round tonight.

KAREN FINNEY, FORMER HILLARY CLINTON PRESS SECRETARY: Hi, Joe.

SCARBOROUGH: We also have Ann Coulter. She’s author of “Treason: Liberal Treachery From the Cold War to the War on Terrorism.” And it’s a must read when it comes out in a few weeks. Let me begin with you, Karen. And I’ll ask you a softball question, just like Barbara Walters. How did Hillary do so great last night?

KAREN FINNEY, FORMER CLINTON PRESS SECRETARY: She was asked a number of questions by Barbara Walters over the course of a couple of interviews. And I think she answered all the questions beautifully. They were truthful and she was candid and honest. And I think she got a fantastic reception. I think it was over 13 million viewers tuned in to watch. And today, there was a tremendous reception at the Barnes and Noble here in New York City. So I think things are great.

SCARBOROUGH: Yes, I’m sure they are, if you’re Hillary Clinton right now. Ann Coulter, I want to play a clip from the interview about Hillary’s different reactions to Gennifer Flowers and Monica Lewinsky. Let’s take a look.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEN. HILLARY CLINTON (D), NEW YORK: Those are private issues that you have to deal with. I was outraged and angry, hurt, terribly disappointed, and very, frankly, not sure that the marriage would or should go on.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

SCARBOROUGH: Ann Coulter, why was the Gennifer Flowers affair a very private matter and her response very private, and yet she went into graphic detail about her reaction, her very private reaction, to Monica Lewinsky?

ANN COULTER, AUTHOR, “TREASON”: Yes, and she also denied the Gennifer Flowers affair on television before the election. That’s after Gennifer Flowers had produced tapes of herself on the phone with Bill Clinton, which Bill Clinton apologized for, for parts of those tapes. If you credit Hillary Clinton and you want to portray her as the sad little woman and the victim, she really should not be sitting in the United States Senate. She should not be anyplace near any levers of power, because she is admitting she’s the stupidest person in the world.

SCARBOROUGH: So I take it you don’t believe that Hillary Clinton was being completely straightforward with the American people last night?

COULTER: No, I don’t think anyone does. I sort of noticed, even listening to liberals talk about her, that it’s always whether or not she told a good story and managed to come up with an answer for everything. No one believes it. They’re just debating how good a story it was.

SCARBOROUGH: Karen Finney, I would have respected Hillary Clinton a lot more if she would have said: All of that is private and I am not going to respond to it. But don’t you believe that, when she came out and went into this great detail on her private response to the affair of Monica Lewinsky and Bill Clinton, that she forever forfeited her right to play the privacy card?

FINNEY: Well, I think it’s very-let’s run at a couple different things. With the case of Paula Jones and Gennifer Flowers, come on. How much longer are we going to have to talk about this? It was years and years and years ago.

COULTER: As long as they keep talking about it.

FINNEY: But then, with regard to the Monica Lewinsky, I think, when Hillary made the decision to write this book, she knew that she was going to have to talk about these things in a candid manner. These were events that took place during her time was in the White House, that, through no fault of her own, were made public. And I think she realized that there were unanswered questions that she needed to address in order to get a full picture of her life in the White House. And I think she did a great-I think she did that.

SCARBOROUGH: Well, Karen, didn’t you just make my point that she knew that she had to write about her private responses to Monica Lewinsky to get $8 million?

FINNEY: I think she understand that, if you’re going to tell a story, her life story, and you’re going to talk about your eight years in the White House, this was part of that experience. She talked about it in a very candid manner. And I give her a lot of credit for doing so.

SCARBOROUGH: Well, she did on that, but...

FINNEY: You can’t have it both ways, Joe, right? Before-when it was announced that she was going to write a book, everybody was speculating as to whether or not she would talk about these things. And now that she has, you don’t like what the answer is. So come on.

(CROSSTALK)

SCARBOROUGH: Listen, Karen, don’t play us for dumb.

FINNEY: I’m not.

SCARBOROUGH: She decides. She’s the one having it both ways.

FINNEY: No.

SCARBOROUGH: She’s the one that decided: I’ll talk about this, but I won’t talk about that. And I’ll plead privacy rights when anybody asks me.

(CROSSTALK)

FINNEY: I think it’s pretty clear that she has been asked questions about those other incidents and she’s answered them.

SCARBOROUGH: Let’s move on to the vast right-wing conspiracy.

FINNEY: It’s really not a conspiracy. It’s pretty out in the open, isn’t it?

(CROSSTALK)

SCARBOROUGH: This is what Hillary Clinton said about the vast right-wing conspiracy.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

CLINTON: I believe there is a very well financed right-wing network of people-it’s not really a conspiracy, because it’s pretty much out in the light of day-that was after his presidency from the very beginning, really stopped at nothing, even to the point of perverting the Constitution, in order to undermine what he was trying to do for the country.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

SCARBOROUGH: Ann Coulter, please respond to that.

COULTER: Yes, apparently, that includes the 57 percent of Americans who voted against Bill Clinton. I do want to point out that the position of the Clinton Kool-Aid drinkers is that they can keep writing endless tomes, spinning lies about the great Clinton presidency and how he saved the Constitution and building museums to him. A 900-page book by Sidney Blumenthal? That is longer than all of the works of Proust-a 600-page book by three ghostwriters for Hillary Clinton. And, meanwhile, whenever a conservative tries to respond to these lies: Oh, you people won’t move on from Clinton. You just can’t stop talking about Paula Jones.

FINNEY: Oh, my goodness.

COULTER: Well, no, no. If you’re going to refuse to move on, then we’re going to refuse to move on, too. And if you’re going to bring it up, conservatives can respond.

(CROSSTALK)

FINNEY: But you all are really very stuck on attacking these people.

SCARBOROUGH: Hey, Karen, Hillary also talked about the poor innocent victims that were left in the wake of the Ken Starr investigation. Let me play you a clip from that.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

CLINTON: So many other people who were totally innocent and just standing by were caught up in this, in this relentless series of investigations. And that, to me, is still a very painful part of that whole experience.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

SCARBOROUGH: Karen, it’s legendary, is it not, the number of innocent victims that were left in the wake of Bill Clinton’s presidency and his governorship? And, really, any place where Bill Clinton went, the people around him ended up in jail or in much worse shape?

FINNEY: Well, let’s be really clear about what happened during the White House years. This was a $70 million much-ado-about-nothing series of attacks that, yes, there were many of us, unfortunately, who got caught up in that. But this was-this was not the doing of Bill Clinton. This was the doing of Ken Starr and many others. So let’s be clear about who really brought this situation out.

SCARBOROUGH: Ann Coulter, wrap it up. Again-we’re hearing again, this is all much ado about nothing.

COULTER: I don’t think Juanita Broaddrick would say that Bill Clinton did not bring this on himself. She claimed she was raped by Bill Clinton, a charge believed by two-thirds of the American people and never

(CROSSTALK)

FINNEY: Well, it was Ken Starr that decided to have a reckless disregard for the Constitution of the United States.

SCARBOROUGH: Hold on. One at a time. Wrap it up.

COULTER: A charge by two-thirds of the American people and never denied by Bill Clinton, thoroughly investigated by...

FINNEY: He left office with a 60 percent approval rating, Ann.

(CROSSTALK)

SCARBOROUGH: Hey, please, Ann Coulter, finish it up, 15 seconds. Go ahead.

COULTER: I think I’ve pretty much finished. They want to keep spinning lies about Bill Clinton. And when a conservative tries to respond: Oh, no, that’s out of order. You can’t respond.

SCARBOROUGH: All right, thank you both so much for being with us tonight.

1 posted on 06/10/2003 1:32:57 PM PDT by cgk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
Scarborough ping!
2 posted on 06/10/2003 1:33:23 PM PDT by cgk (Rummy on WMD: We haven't found Saddam Hussein yet, but I don't see anyone saying HE didn't exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Ann Coulter ping!
3 posted on 06/10/2003 1:33:43 PM PDT by cgk (Rummy on WMD: We haven't found Saddam Hussein yet, but I don't see anyone saying HE didn't exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

4 posted on 06/10/2003 1:36:21 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
Ann was pretty good on this segment last night. I just wish Scarborough had pulled the plug on Finney.
5 posted on 06/10/2003 1:38:11 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cgk
The dead White House friends score:

Clinton - 86
Dubya - 0

Jeesh what a wipeout!
6 posted on 06/10/2003 1:38:23 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
LOL!
I sat here looking at that picture waiting for her to "pinocchio-ize".
7 posted on 06/10/2003 1:40:35 PM PDT by cgk (Rummy on WMD: We haven't found Saddam Hussein yet, but I don't see anyone saying HE didn't exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
I do as well. The times I've seen Ann on Scarborough, she's always interruped and Joe mostly lets it happen, then switches to another question. Notably missing from the transcript was Ann saying "I thought *I* was supposed to be replying" or something along those lines.
8 posted on 06/10/2003 1:43:15 PM PDT by cgk (Rummy on WMD: We haven't found Saddam Hussein yet, but I don't see anyone saying HE didn't exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Republicus2001
I sure didn't understand Hillary's talk about the "4 (??) innocent victims" of the investigations. Was Mary Mahoney one of them??
9 posted on 06/10/2003 1:45:35 PM PDT by cgk (Rummy on WMD: We haven't found Saddam Hussein yet, but I don't see anyone saying HE didn't exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cgk
I sure didn't understand Hillary's talk about the "4 (??) innocent victims" of the investigations. Was Mary Mahoney one of them??
It would be interesting to deconstruct who she is speaking of...
10 posted on 06/10/2003 1:58:41 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cgk
Knowing Hillary, the four victims were Bill, Chelsea, Betty Currie, and, of course, herself.
11 posted on 06/10/2003 2:14:46 PM PDT by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

*sigh*

12 posted on 06/10/2003 2:16:00 PM PDT by SquirrelKing (Mad enough to eat BB's and crap ten-penny nails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cgk
read later
13 posted on 06/10/2003 2:55:46 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
"FINNEY: He left office with a 60 percent approval rating"

Nooooo he didn't. Even though his job approval was over 55%, HIS PERSONAL APPROVAL RATING WAS 25% - today his personal approval rating is 17%.
14 posted on 06/10/2003 3:21:21 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
What an absolutely good point!

His personal approval rating in the crapper.
15 posted on 06/10/2003 3:31:40 PM PDT by Ole Okie (William Fitzgerald Blythe Clintoon?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie
And ... if you check out Bush's "personal approval" numbers, you will find they are anywhere between 70-80% - while his job approval may only be 67% at the present time.
16 posted on 06/10/2003 3:42:55 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: firebrand; StarFan; Dutchy; stanz; RaceBannon; Cacique; Clemenza; rmlew; NYC GOP Chick; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘general interest’ ping list.

17 posted on 06/10/2003 8:11:53 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
FINNEY: Well, it was Ken Starr that decided to have a reckless disregard for the Constitution of the United States.

The Clinton's could have fired him at any given moment if he was so against the constitution! Same ole lies by the same ole cronies. Old news, move on, Starr is evil, Clinton's are victims, blah, blah, blah. They are our curse.

18 posted on 06/10/2003 8:18:31 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rmlew; Clemenza; yonif; cgk
FYI... Joe mentioned tonight that this fall he will be taking Scarborough Country on a nationwide tour of college campuses, checking in with "embedded college conservatives"! Sounds interesting...
19 posted on 06/10/2003 8:32:54 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg; Brad's Gramma
I haven't watched it yet (TiVo!), but that sounds pretty great. It will be nice if he can root them out. I avoid the "Hardball" college tour shows. (Well, I avoid ALL the Hardball shows, but mostly because of those). ;) BTW, nutmeg & gramma - go here for silly fun
20 posted on 06/10/2003 8:35:56 PM PDT by cgk (Rummy on WMD: We haven't found Saddam Hussein yet, but I don't see anyone saying HE didn't exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson