Gay couple married after ruling (Toronto, Canada)

TheStar.com ^ | June 10, 2003 | TRACEY TYLER AND TRACY HUFFMAN

[dansangel]

I couldn't think of anywhere near that many words. :O)

*I* can - and they are *ALL* unprintable!

[Bigg Red]

Fact is, they are not normal..

Exactly

[lindsay]

l just looked at a poll in the Toronto newspaper The National Post, 80% of Canadians are against this change in law.l wonder if now that the definition of marriage has been changed will polygamy be accepted as well.

[MeekOneGOP]

Texas doesn't recognize same sex marriages period. In fact, our Governor Rick Perry just signed a new law a couple of weeks ago specifically spelling it out. We didn't NEED that law because it was already covered in the statutes. Some of the LIBS hated that too. I felt their pain - NOT !!!!

[MeekOneGOP]

*I* can - and they are *ALL* unprintable!

hehe ! I understand.

[He Rides A White Horse]

I'm wondering what country we will be forced to invade first in the future, Canada or Mexico.

[IvanT]

Freedom.

Gays have existed since the time of the Bible.

What is your solution? To eradicate them all as Hitler tried to do?

To spend billions of dollars on fruitless (Pardon the pun) endeavours to therapeutically turn them into heterosexuals?

Give them their own island somewhere?

Make them watch Clint Eastwood movies until they turned macho?

Live and let live, they're not harming anyone, I hope they're happy, isn't that what everyone wants?

Would Jesus approve of the frankly boorish comments I've read in this thread? Afterall, he befriended Mary Magdelaine, and spent time with lepers.

[SkyPilot]

Gays have existed since the time of the Bible.

So has murder, theft, and lying. Sin is sin.

What is your solution? To eradicate them all as Hitler tried to do?

No, the issue here is that marrige exists between a man and a woman.

To spend billions of dollars on fruitless (Pardon the pun) endeavours to therapeutically turn them into heterosexuals?

No, the issue here is that marrige exists between a man and a woman. Give them their own island somewhere?

Make them watch Clint Eastwood movies until they turned macho?

No, the issue here is that marrige exists between a man and a woman.

Live and let live, they're not harming anyone, I hope they're happy, isn't that what everyone wants?

No, the issue here is that marrige exists between a man and a woman.

Would Jesus approve of the frankly boorish comments I've read in this thread? Afterall, he befriended Mary Magdelaine, and spent time with lepers.

Jesus (as the Son of God) also wrote the scriptures condemning homosexuality. Inconvienient to your argument, but true nonetheless. Also, Jesus also said to Mary Magdalene: "Now go, and sin no more.

[cherry_bomb88]

ummmmm, yeah...ok

I guess next animals will be able to wed and have the same benefits as traditional married couples.

[breakem]

I don't know if animals will wed, but my neighbor keeps saying her first husband was a pig.

[cherry_bomb88]

Well said, SP

See, Ivan, you're missing the point.....MARRIAGE EXISTS BETWEEN A MAN & A WOMAN

If they want to partake in fornication in their own bedrooms, so be it....just DO NOT force it on us to accept it as normal and deserving of the same rights as marriage in the traditional sense....what's next??? Accepting child molestors???? Those have existed since the dawn of time too...so, now we're supposed to just accept it?

I truly believe in the phrase "love the sinner hate the sin", I don't have any contempt or loathing for them as people, I do, however, have strong contempt for what they do, it is wrong....it always has been and it always will be.

If they want to be gay, great, but do it knowing it is unacceptable to the majority of society and therefore suffer the consequences of your actions. If you hold yourself out to be different from the "norm", expect to be treated as such.

[cherry_bomb88]

ROTFL....mine was a donkey's rear end! (read a-hole)

Wait, what am I say "was"....change that to still is.

[SkyPilot]

My first girlfriend said I was a tiger.

[blackbart1]

...but I say Yuck!!!

That was my first reaction.

[Hat-Trick]

Not in Nebraska. We have an amendment in our state constitution that recognizes marraige only as a union between a man and a woman. This was a petition initiative that ended up on the ballot and passed at general election with over 70% of the vote. The usual cast of sodomites have been screaming about it ever since. It'll end up before the Nebraska Supreme Court (God, please help us) sometime within the next 2 years, I'm guessing.

Hat-Trick

[B Knotts]

The next types of marriages to be legalized in Canada:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/926941/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/926810/posts

[Conservative til I die]

Congratulations to Bruce and Antoine.

[Kevin Curry]

We have an amendment in our state constitution that recognizes marraige only as a union between a man and a woman.

California has a similar provision. It hasn't even proven to be a speed bump for gay activists. They are pushing a measure through lawmakers that would grant legal recognition to same-sex unions, i.e., calling it something other than "marriage" but amounting to the same thing.

[jimt]

Next in line, pedophiles, incestuous types, group sex, animal lovers, etc. Who says that they are any less deserving than these two guys?

EXACTLY !

That picture deserves a barf alert if any ever did.

[MeekOneGOP]

I'm wondering what country we will be forced to invade first in the future, Canada or Mexico.

Insanity on both sides.

Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right . . .