Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Threatens To Pull NATO HQ Out Of Belgium
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 6-13-2003 | Ambrose Evans-Prichard

Posted on 06/12/2003 6:35:21 PM PDT by blam

US threatens to pull Nato HQ out of Belgium

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Brussels
(Filed: 13/06/2003)

Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, threatened to pull Nato's headquarters out of Brussels yesterday unless Belgium revoked a legislation giving its courts the power to prosecute foreigners for alleged war crimes committed anywhere in the world.

Donald Rumsfeld

Mr Rumsfeld, who was in Brussels for a Nato summit, said Washington had already decided to block funding for Nato's new buildings to protest against the harassment of Americans by Left-wing Belgian lawyers trying to score political points.

"These suits are absurd. By passing this law, Belgium has turned its legal system into a platform for divisive politicised lawsuits against her Nato allies," he said. "For our part, we will have to seriously consider whether we can allow our civilian and military officials to come to Belgium."

"We will have to oppose all further spending for a Nato headquarters in Brussels until we know with certainty Belgium intends to be a hospitable place."

The human rights law has already been used to launch criminal prosecutions against Gen Tommy Franks, the commander of US forces in Iraq, over the use of cluster bombs, which claimed civilian lives.

Colin Powell, the US secretary of state, George Bush Snr and Ariel Sharon, the Israeli prime minister, have also been targets, though the Belgian government is rowing back frantically, opting to deflect complaints against serving officials to courts in their own countries.

The row overshadowed the Nato summit, which was supposed to repair the damage over Iraq and transform Nato from a Cold War dinosaur into a nimble strike force.

Billed as the biggest shake-up for half a century, the 19-member alliance - to grow to 26 next year - is shutting down bases scattered from the Aegean to Stavanger in the Arctic circle.

Instead of a static alliance built to resist the onslaught of Russian tanks, it will now focus on a 20,000-strong rapid reaction force able to operate worldwide within 30 days, and an elite commando unit ready in just five days.

Defence ministers also pledged to boost spending so that the alliance can start to close the yawning military gap with the Pentagon.

Nato was reduced to a mere spectator in the Afghan campaign, while Pentagon hardliners ruffled feathers by working with a handful of close partners outside the alliance. But officials say the Americans are now startled by their own isolation. Washington wants Nato to take over in Afghanistan and play a key role in Iraq.

There is also a growing awareness that any damage to Nato ultimately serves the interests of France, Belgium and those in Germany who want to turn the Euro-army into a rival force.

• David Rennie in Washington writes: France, Germany and Syria yesterday abstained on a United Nations resolution granting US peacekeeping forces immunity from a new international war crimes tribunal, in a show of disapproval that will anger the Bush administration.

By 12-0, the UN Security Council approved an extension, for a further 12 months, of an opt-out clause secured by the United States last year. That initial opt-out was won after Washington threatened to veto all UN peacekeeping missions.

The Bush administration has withdrawn support for the International Criminal Court amid fears that US personnel would face frivolous or politically inspired prosecutions for crimes against humanity. Britain backs the ICC, saying it offers adequate safeguards against such prosecutions.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: belgium; hq; nato; natosummit; rumsfeld; threatens; us; warcrimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 06/12/2003 6:35:21 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
Good deal
No foreign entanglements
especially with those who do not share our interests or who work contrary to them
2 posted on 06/12/2003 6:37:32 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Works for me!
3 posted on 06/12/2003 6:38:09 PM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
A 20,000 member "rapid response" force able to deploy within "30 days" is NOT what I would consider a rapid response force.
4 posted on 06/12/2003 6:39:05 PM PDT by AngrySpud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The UN belongs in Brussels, less it's funding from the United States. It is about time for the US to stop being the wimpy whipping boy of the world.
5 posted on 06/12/2003 6:39:55 PM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Nato was reduced to a mere spectator in the Afghan campaign

Rewriting history. Germany, France and Belgium blocked Nato countries' involvement, IIRC.
6 posted on 06/12/2003 6:44:06 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Unspun with AnnaZ
June 12th, 2003 -- 7pmP/10pmE

with Special Guest Hostess
Diotima

Hilliaryious!
(and continued Schadenfest*)

We'll be catching up with the DC Chapter of Free Republic and Hilliary!'s "book" tour.

* The Unspun Schadenfest continues due to this!

Plus as always

Boneheaded Lie-beral Quotes and this week's CRB

Click HERE to LISTEN LIVE while you FReep!

Click HERE for the RadioFR Chat Room!

Miss a show? Click HERE for the RadioFR Archives!


7 posted on 06/12/2003 6:44:57 PM PDT by RadioFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
I fear all that will occur when the next Democrat gets in the White House. The Bush administration is certainly a logjam, blocking all this stuff. But the day the Democrats take power it will all burst forth.
8 posted on 06/12/2003 6:45:37 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
Bill has it right. Move the UN to Brussels, let them set up shop, and merge with NATO.
9 posted on 06/12/2003 6:45:44 PM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the Belgiums second only to the French in terms of cowardly pretentiousness?
10 posted on 06/12/2003 6:46:13 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace ((the original))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
NATO should be disbanded.

It serves no useful function other than to give the "perfumed princes" in the upper ranks of the Pentagon a cushy all-expenses-paid assignment 2-year vacation in Europe.

11 posted on 06/12/2003 6:47:19 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Belgium. Whew, these folks are nuts. Well at least their nutty court system is. Bazaaro to say the least.
12 posted on 06/12/2003 6:48:12 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngrySpud
Nato from a Cold War dinosaur into a nimble strike force

Yeah -- just like the movie.


Just you wait 'enry 'iggins, Just you wait!

13 posted on 06/12/2003 6:49:43 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
The last time Belgium and Brussels in particular truely stood proudly on the world stage was when they hosted the Worlds Fair.

Guess they have more in common with the French than I thought. They still want to the leading lethario on the world stage and this is the best bit part they can come up with.

Rummie needs to move NATO to Warsaw NOW!
14 posted on 06/12/2003 7:14:51 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Pull NATO out. Belgium will be another economically-deprived euro nation. Surely some other country would love to be the HQ will all that money coming in.
15 posted on 06/12/2003 7:17:50 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
those who do not share our interests or who work contrary to them

the interests of France, Belgium and those in Germany who want to turn the Euro-army into a rival force.

Now, what ever gave you that idea?;-)

16 posted on 06/12/2003 7:32:41 PM PDT by StriperSniper (Frogs are for gigging)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
Poland would make a great central location for NATO HQ.
I think they might even issue an engraved invitation to Rumsfield for the diplomatic "honor".
They deserve it more so than Belgium.
Actually, wouldnt we all be happier if NATO HQ was in NYC, and the UN was HQd in Belgium?
Makes a lot more sence to me if those two organisations traded spaces.
17 posted on 06/12/2003 7:44:30 PM PDT by sarasmom (Punish France.Ignore Germany.Forgive Russia..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom
"Actually, wouldnt we all be happier if NATO HQ was in NYC, and the UN was HQd in Belgium? Makes a lot more sence to me if those two organisations traded spaces."

I would like to see us out of both those organisations.

18 posted on 06/12/2003 7:48:27 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blam
NATO should be in Prague or Budapest, but definitely not in Belgium. Americans still don't know the whole story on how Belgium failed to help the US and how she tried to frustrate the US when she could to hurt our efforts to free Iraq. Belgium is just a smelly little country that should be called France lite or France even liter. We cannot continue to allow these squeemish sissy countries to mock us and work against us and then spend billions in their economy. That's like pouring defense dollars into Massachusetts.
19 posted on 06/12/2003 11:39:43 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Liberalism corrupts. Absolute Liberalism corrupts absolutely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
"move NATO to Warsaw NOW! "

That's the ticket. We could call it The Warsaw Pact.

yitbos

20 posted on 06/12/2003 11:48:37 PM PDT by bruinbirdman (Lex et Libertas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson