Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Powerful Senator Endorses Destroying Computers of Illegal Downloaders (Orrin Hatch)
AP ^ | 6/17/03 | Ted Bridis

Posted on 06/17/2003 2:54:06 PM PDT by Jean S

WASHINGTON (AP) - The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Tuesday he favors developing new technology to remotely destroy the computers of people who illegally download music from the Internet.

The surprise remarks by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, during a hearing on copyright abuses represent a dramatic escalation in the frustrating battle by industry executives and lawmakers in Washington against illegal music downloads.

During a discussion on methods to frustrate computer users who illegally exchange music and movie files over the Internet, Hatch asked technology executives about ways to damage computers involved in such file trading. Legal experts have said any such attack would violate federal anti-hacking laws.

"No one is interested in destroying anyone's computer," replied Randy Saaf of MediaDefender Inc., a secretive Los Angeles company that builds technology to disrupt music downloads. One technique deliberately downloads pirated material very slowly so other users can't.

"I'm interested," Hatch interrupted. He said damaging someone's computer "may be the only way you can teach somebody about copyrights."

The senator acknowledged Congress would have to enact an exemption for copyright owners from liability for damaging computers. He endorsed technology that would twice warn a computer user about illegal online behavior, "then destroy their computer."

"If we can find some way to do this without destroying their machines, we'd be interested in hearing about that," Hatch said. "If that's the only way, then I'm all for destroying their machines. If you have a few hundred thousand of those, I think people would realize" the seriousness of their actions, he said.

"There's no excuse for anyone violating copyright laws," Hatch said.

Rep. Rick Boucher, D-Va., who has been active in copyright debates in Washington, urged Hatch to reconsider. Boucher described Hatch's role as chairman of the Judiciary Committee as "a very important position, so when Senator Hatch indicates his views with regard to a particular subject, we all take those views very seriously."

Some legal experts suggested Hatch's provocative remarks were more likely intended to compel technology and music executives to work faster toward ways to protect copyrights online than to signal forthcoming legislation.

"It's just the frustration of those who are looking at enforcing laws that are proving very hard to enforce," said Orin Kerr, a former Justice Department cybercrimes prosecutor and associate professor at George Washington University law school.

The entertainment industry has gradually escalated its fight against Internet file-traders, targeting the most egregious pirates with civil lawsuits. The Recording Industry Association of America recently won a federal court decision making it significantly easier to identify and track consumers - even those hiding behind aliases - using popular Internet file-sharing software.

Kerr predicted it was "extremely unlikely" for Congress to approve a hacking exemption for copyright owners, partly because of risks of collateral damage when innocent users might be wrongly targeted.

"It wouldn't work," Kerr said. "There's no way of limiting the damage."

Last year, Rep. Howard Berman, D-Calif., ignited a firestorm across the Internet over a proposal to give the entertainment industry new powers to disrupt downloads of pirated music and movies. It would have lifted civil and criminal penalties against entertainment companies for disabling, diverting or blocking the trading of pirated songs and movies on the Internet.

But Berman, ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary panel on the Internet and intellectual property, always has maintained that his proposal wouldn't permit hacker-style attacks by the industry on Internet users.

---

On the Net: Sen. Hatch: http://hatch.senate.gov

AP-ES-06-17-03 1716EDT


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: copyright; cyberattack; cyberwar; download; filesharing; grokster; hatch; kazaa; krusgnet; mp3; napster; orrinhatch; riaa; rickboucher; rino; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-370 next last
To: JeanS; All
Y'all are missing the bigger point.....they are watching/tracking what we download....

What's next??? The dems get into power and blow up our computers for participating in FR???? Or listening to Rush 24/7?????

61 posted on 06/17/2003 3:48:12 PM PDT by cherry_bomb88 (Are you on the right side of the wrong issue or the wrong side of the right issue?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Luckily, we have special protections built into Krusgnet to protect against this kind of skullduggery.
62 posted on 06/17/2003 3:48:42 PM PDT by adam_az
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: JeanS
I guess my backups won't do any good huh Orrin?


64 posted on 06/17/2003 3:49:12 PM PDT by unixfox (Close the borders, problems solved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
"I'm interested," Hatch interrupted. He said damaging someone's computer "may be the only way you can teach somebody about copyrights."

Hey Hatch, I sure hope you were not serious about this ..

If you try to destroy peoples computers .. You my Dear Senator WILL be voted out of office

65 posted on 06/17/2003 3:49:28 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled
ROTFL....man, I hope they do just so I could see that!!!!(kidding) but it would be funny!
66 posted on 06/17/2003 3:49:33 PM PDT by cherry_bomb88 (Are you on the right side of the wrong issue or the wrong side of the right issue?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
This is letting the record companies be judge, jury and executioner.

Exactly. I'm astounded that Hatch is seriously proposing this. I thought he might have a clue based on some of his comments about problems with the DMCA, but apparently not.

67 posted on 06/17/2003 3:50:46 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rs79bm
CD Trader! Let someone else pay the big bucks....lol
68 posted on 06/17/2003 3:50:53 PM PDT by cherry_bomb88 (Are you on the right side of the wrong issue or the wrong side of the right issue?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
What a poltroon. Will the good citizens of Utah continue to be so lame as to re-elect this guy for yet another decade of bluster and bull$#!t?

As an attorney and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Hatch surely is quite be familiar with the concept of due process under the law. Would he be willing to personally indemnify all wrongfully-accused Americans with respect to the unjustified destruction of their computers and the data, records, and work products contained therein?

Hatch is, in my view, one of the sorriest of creatures that make up a subset of my co-religionists, in that he is the prototypical Utah Mormon Weenie of the Mitt Romney genre -- not to be confused with other members of the "Mormon" Church residing in Utah and around the world who simply are living their lives in accordance with the Gospel.

From his prideful attempts at becoming a contemporary music star; to his arrogant demeanor, which I am sorry to say I have observed up-close-and-personal; to his companying with and abetting of the worst of the liberal scum now infesting our republic; to his ongoing metamorphosis into a more-than-liberal RINO, he should be viewed as a disappointment and an embarrassment to his ever-gullible constituency from whose values he continues to diverge.

Hang it up, Orrin, and make people happy with your honestly genuine musical talent......

69 posted on 06/17/2003 3:50:55 PM PDT by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
If the computer is destroyed, there may not be evidence to prove the violation. There will be liability for damage to the equipment and damage to the business interests of the party who owned the damaged computer.

Great point, I think I would almost enjoy losing everything on my computer-because I'm taking money out of hungry Record Execs mouths, just to take on Orrin Hatch.

To think I respected this guy for fighting for Estrada and Owens, what an absolute moron, and corporate shill.

70 posted on 06/17/2003 3:51:14 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Press Secret; Of 2 million Shiite pilgrims, only 3000 chanted anti Americanisms--source-Islamonline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
There was a Mac virus that changed the monitor refresh rate...pumped it up so high that the monitor caught fire if the machine was running long enough.

LOL! That's hilarious.

71 posted on 06/17/2003 3:51:28 PM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Man, Scottish Law is way harsh...
72 posted on 06/17/2003 3:51:43 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Does Hatch realize exactly how much of that stuff in the Mormon genealogical archives has been purloined from copyrighted books and articles?

Are you saying that you can copyright genealogical information? Can history be copyrighted? This is a serious question, because I don't know the law here.

73 posted on 06/17/2003 3:52:40 PM PDT by oremites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: jpl
I would love to know how one goes about remotely "destroying a computer".

Not actually too difficult. There are a few viruses and worms around that do the trick, if you're unlucky and they bite you on the right day.

But if music companies actually go about writing malware, it will sure be interesting to watch the retaliation ;).

74 posted on 06/17/2003 3:52:55 PM PDT by Cachelot (~ In waters near you ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Tuesday he favors developing new technology to remotely destroy the computers of people who illegally download music from the Internet. The surprise remarks by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, during a hearing on copyright abuses represent a dramatic escalation in the frustrating battle by industry executives and lawmakers in Washington against illegal music downloads.

You can always count on Whorin' Atch to say somethin' stoopid.

75 posted on 06/17/2003 3:53:00 PM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
As long as Hatch is in this kind of mood, why don't we re-design the U.S. Capitol so that the roof caves in on both chambers whenever Congress passes an unconstitutional law?
76 posted on 06/17/2003 3:53:42 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
The senator acknowledged Congress would have to enact an exemption for copyright owners from liability for damaging computers.

Copyright © 2003 by Myrddin

Surprise! You've just downloaded a copyrighted work. As the owner of this copyrighted work, I'm now protected by the government for the damage that is currently being done to your computer.

I'll bet the virus writers are just ecstatic at the prospect of hanging a copyright notice on each virus and thumbing their collective noses at Orrin Hatch.

77 posted on 06/17/2003 3:54:31 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
There was a Mac virus that changed the monitor refresh rate...pumped it up so high that the monitor caught fire if the machine was running long enough.

LOL! That's hilarious.

Would you care to clarify your remarks? There is nothing hilarious about that. Unless it is happening to Record Executives, but that goes without saying.

78 posted on 06/17/2003 3:55:51 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Press Secret; Of 2 million Shiite pilgrims, only 3000 chanted anti Americanisms--source-Islamonline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
Like, this is a joke? Correct? He can't be serious?

He's probably serious now, but that doesn't mean anything when he gets opposition

"Don't count your Hatch before he chickens", as they say.

79 posted on 06/17/2003 3:56:02 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (I barbeque with Sweet Baby Ray's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
They can have my illegal downloads when they pry them from my cold, carpal tunneled mouse hand.
80 posted on 06/17/2003 3:56:08 PM PDT by nravoter (I've given a name to my pain, and it's "Hillary".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-370 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson