Skip to comments.
Man Serves Hard Time for Cleaning Dump
CNSNews.com ^
| June 18, 2003
| National Center for Public Policy Research
Posted on 06/18/2003 7:27:26 PM PDT by microgood
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Unbelievable. I do not understand how he got the jail time by being sued in civil court.
1
posted on
06/18/2003 7:27:26 PM PDT
by
microgood
To: microgood
I want to see another article on this before I make up my mind, but there's no question that if the facts are as this article cites them, this isn't a pardonable offense as he didn't commit a crime. It needs to be overturned, not pardoned. And this whole family deserves damages and compensation from the government--federal, state, and especially local.
2
posted on
06/18/2003 7:32:46 PM PDT
by
ChemistCat
(Transformers look just as good by morning light as they did the night before.)
To: mhking
Please ping your list to this one. How about HOLD MY USED TIRES...
3
posted on
06/18/2003 7:33:23 PM PDT
by
ChemistCat
(Transformers look just as good by morning light as they did the night before.)
To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
"Hold muh beer 'n watch this!" PING....
If you want on or off this list, please let me know!
4
posted on
06/18/2003 7:39:32 PM PDT
by
mhking
To: ChemistCat
I believe the government claimed that he committed the crime of filling in a wetlands area. I'm unhappy with this whole case, too. I first heard about it some years ago in the WSJ before he was convicted and imprisoned. I never thought he would get the jail time they were threatening him with.
5
posted on
06/18/2003 7:41:59 PM PDT
by
expatpat
To: microgood
Liberals are evil.
To: ChemistCat
From epa's web site:
Wetlands Criminal Enforcement
Since enactment of the Clean Water Act, EPA and the Corps have used their criminal enforcement authoritites sparingly in response to Section 404 violations. As demonstrated by the following examples, EPA and the Corps reserve their criminal enforcement authority for only the most flagrant and egregious Section 404 violations.
United States v. Pozsgai
In December 1989, a Philadelphia jury convicted John Pozsgai on 40 counts of knowingly filling wetlands in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, without a Section 404 permit. Mr. Pozsgai was sentenced to three years in jail, ordered to restore the site upon his release, and assessed a fine. His conviction and sentence have been affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court. Even prior to purchasing the 14-acre tract in 1987, Mr. Pozsgai was told by private consultants that the site contained wetlands subject to permitting requirements of Section 404. He purchased the property at a reduced price due to the presence of wetlands, and then proceeded to ignore no fewer than ten warnings from EPA and Corps field staff to stop filling the wetlands without first getting a Section 404 permit. He also defied a temporary restraining order (TRO) issued by a Federal court judge. In fact, the government documented violations of the TRO on videtape, thanks to the cooperation of neighbors whose homes were being flooded as a result of Mr. Pozsgais filling in his wetlands.
To: Luke Skyfreeper
a Philadelphia jury convicted John Pozsgai
Either it was the Pennsylvania equivalent of the OJ jury, or we're being snowed by the son....
I do not think cleaning up a dump should be criminalized--there should be a high burden of proof for the government here. Thanks much for confusing me further--LOL!
8
posted on
06/18/2003 7:54:39 PM PDT
by
ChemistCat
(Transformers look just as good by morning light as they did the night before.)
To: microgood
Hold muh enviro-nazi alert!
To: microgood
They should sue the township for knowingly selling the family a toxic waste site without cleaning it up first.
If old cars are dumps then the lead batteries in them are toxic waste.
10
posted on
06/18/2003 7:56:14 PM PDT
by
Chewbacca
(Start colonizing the Moon and Mars so I can get off this loony bin they call Earth.)
To: microgood
In 2002, three environmental organizations went to federal court asking for the right to take Pozsgai to court to force him to "restore" the site.I would be in jail for killing a few of those lousy, busybody #@$%@#$#&**@.
11
posted on
06/18/2003 8:13:41 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: moyden2000
"Liberals are evil."
This is what happens when you give power to Liberals. They are usually corrupt and abuse their power. They are mostly evil. They were just dying to prosecute this guy. Sounds like to me.
One reason Bush needs to appoint conservative judges to the courts. Get these a**hole Liberals out.
12
posted on
06/18/2003 8:14:20 PM PDT
by
auggy
(http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
To: ChemistCat
That jury really needed to know about the 1000 year old right of jury nullification that allows the jury to judge the law as well as the facts.
13
posted on
06/18/2003 8:17:27 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: microgood
WHAT A HIDEOUS MISCHARRIAGE OF JUSTICE AND AN EXTREME EXAMPLE OF BUREAUCRATIC INSANITY NO MATTER HOW YOU SLICE IT, NO MATTER ANY OTHER PERSPECTIVE EVEN IF ONLY 25% OF THESE FACTS ARE TRUE.
Besides, having heard enough of such organizations from around these parts--it sounds like business as usual. These folk have no brains and their empty heads are stuck in places the sun doesn't shine.
14
posted on
06/18/2003 8:21:37 PM PDT
by
Quix
To: ChemistCat
I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU. This guy needs what--3 X punitive damages etc.?
I'd love it if the tree huggers had to sell some trees to pay damages to this man.
And I love trees dearly. But insanity is still insanity.
15
posted on
06/18/2003 8:23:00 PM PDT
by
Quix
To: Luke Skyfreeper
HIDEOUS. SIMPLY HIDEOUS INSANITY.
16
posted on
06/18/2003 8:24:33 PM PDT
by
Quix
To: microgood
please note that, according to the EPA info posted above, this guy kept ignoring warnings and filled in the site, which then caused his neighbors' houses to flood. if any of us lived next to this guy, and he caused our houses to flood, we might not be so favorable towards him.
i think the first article (based on his daughter's testimony) may be somewhat misleading. and remember, a jury did convict him.
17
posted on
06/18/2003 9:08:27 PM PDT
by
drhogan
To: microgood; mhking; marsh2; dixiechick2000; Mama_Bear; doug from upland; WolfsView; Issaquahking; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
18
posted on
06/18/2003 10:10:54 PM PDT
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: farmfriend
Unbelievable Bump...
19
posted on
06/18/2003 10:24:14 PM PDT
by
tubebender
(FReepin Awesome...)
To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!!!
20
posted on
06/19/2003 3:07:08 AM PDT
by
E.G.C.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson