Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Hillary WON'T run for re-election in 2006.......and a few other special surprise predictions....
one man's opinion.....

Posted on 06/19/2003 9:26:23 AM PDT by ken5050

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last
To: ken5050
look for Chelsea to get engaged in 2005, with a June 2006 wedding....and Hillary throwing herself into the whirlwind of planning for it....imagine all the covers on Bride, People, et al, and of course the overarching question...how will she deal with Bill, the ex-president, ex-husband, at the wedding? I mean, when the bride's parents have their dance....can you just die?..and will Bill come stag, or bring his squeeze du-jour? It boggles the mind......

It's easy, Bill will bring his latest squeeze, and Hillary will bring Janet Reno. Each can dance with the partners they came with :)

81 posted on 06/19/2003 1:32:49 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (America...love it or leave it. Canada is due north-Mexico is directly south...start walking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; ken5050
I have to agree. The difference being 9/11. The whole public thought process has changed.

Remember the x42 impeachment numbers - 75% didn't want him removed from office ...?? Well, one year later - 75% thought HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN REMOVED.

Add to that opinion shift, 9/11 - and the x42 regime is in the toilet (Hitlery included). She has STAGED her "best selling" book ad nauseum. But the truth is leaking out already that it's not a "best seller". Instead of taking years - the truth is coming out much faster - a few days or weeks is all it takes.

As for "this" happening again - I hate to break it to ya folks ... but "this" has already happened many, many times. For Hitlery to even pretend he's being good ... well it's just beyond the pale.

As for Bloomberg - I don't think he's as big a stooge as x42 to support Hitlery's run for office. He seems very ego driven himself, and he has a long-time girlfriend. Of couse, I could be wrong about him - and maybe the thought of him being able to get the WH himself - after her - might be enough to entice him - I'm not sure about him.

As for Hitlery divorcing x42 - I can't see it. Two reasons; (1) if she leaves her Senate office - she's open to indictment. (2) If she's open to indictment, she would no longer be able to keep x42 from being indicted. They are in this together - and they must stay together in order to PROTECT EACH OTHER legally.

Howlin - I do agree with you that her staying with x42 will cause a lot of people (women especially) to question her "smarts" at staying with him.

My prediction is - she'll be drafted in 04 - LOOOOOOOOSE so badly - she'll be discarded just like Gore. If she runs in 06 - Rudy will bury her - she'll be out of office and stuck with x42's history and philandering for company.

Her legacy (as well as x42's) is THEY DESTROYED THE DEMOCRAT PARTY BY THEIR HARD LEFT WING POLITICS. My belief is the "real" dems will be glad to be out of power for years, just to rid the party of this power hungry, evil, nasty, lying, deceitful group.
82 posted on 06/19/2003 1:42:29 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
OK....that's my take....but as you flame away, ask yourself, seriously, where I'm wrong in my logic...

I'd never dream of flaming you! But I think your crystal ball is fuzzy. For me, I see the Clintons as the kind of people who inspire loyalty out of fear (FBI files, anyone?) The best judge of a person is to see the kind of people they hang around with. And the Clintons sure as heck hang around with a lot of convicted scum.

None of their "supporters" are supporters because they love the Clintons, they're supporters because they're looking for weaknesses, waiting to pounce. Because they're afraid of their dirty linen being hung out for every one to see.

As time goes on, there will be found a Democrat that "appears" to have all the charm, charisma of an old time Democrat the and the DNC will support this candidate, deliberating encouraging the wrath of the Clintons, because this candidate will be the only one to bring the Clintons down. Oh, and this candidate will not have an FBI file. This candidate will be a future person, with little public experience. He won't win, but he will finally rid us of this Clinton pestilence.

83 posted on 06/19/2003 1:53:31 PM PDT by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
...dwindling as rapidly as her(fairly)good looks...

The only possible excuse for this statement is that you are actually Mr. Helen Thomas... :-)
84 posted on 06/19/2003 1:54:28 PM PDT by BlueMondaySkipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
very interesting.............

Larry Nichols, you remember him from Arkansas, was on Jim Quinn this morning predicting that her heinous will actually run in '04. He thinks the clintoons feel that W will be vulnerable and they are currently in the process of undermining him. Remember, these people don't think like everyone else which is why they've been so successful.

We must be prepared to deal w/ her when she comes out, either in 04 or 08. We can't afford to laugh her off.

85 posted on 06/19/2003 1:59:41 PM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF
You're half right and half wrong.

You're right that the official unemployment rate does not reflect people being UNDERemployed. Although there are other stats that measure household income and disposable income, a big problem today is people with advanced degrees, or advanced skills, forced into low-skill, low-wage work.

However, you're completely wrong about unemployment benefits. Official unemployment rate is a fraction the numerator of which is all people not working who want to work, and the denominator of which is all people who want to work plus all people who are working. You become a part of the unemployment rate as soon as you want work and don't have it, even if you're not eligible for unemployment because you just left school or the service or lost a job that didn't make you eligible. You stay part of it when you lose your unemployment benefits.

The big thing that official unemployment doesn't capture is people who give up and stop looking for paid workforce becuase of bad economic conditions. Going on long term federal disability, women who decide to stay home with the kids because the low-wage work they could get leave enough (or anything) left over after daycare, going back to school for a degree you don't necessarily want or need (and are going to have trouble paying off the loans for).
86 posted on 06/19/2003 2:06:09 PM PDT by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

You have a very good, very, very good tactical sense.

Avoiding a close race in NY, or more critically, a loss to Rudy, is essential. Rudy CAN beat her. And I have already heard about the Page Six story about Bill cavorting with some Canadian CEO who is swimming in cash. The woman is in her thirties and has been seen with Clinton at restaurants and Democratic Party fundraisers.

So she can win the nomination even without a Senate seat. Indeed, it may be to her advantage to serve one term, as you say.

Unfortunately for Thunder Thighs, in the General Election Karl Rove will unleash the Hammer....

...who will kick Hillary's ass so hard there will be bucketfulls of lard spread all over the country.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

87 posted on 06/19/2003 2:19:58 PM PDT by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi has returned! Tanned, rested, and ready.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zip
ping
88 posted on 06/19/2003 7:59:52 PM PDT by Mrs Zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
That's it...I'm calling Cleo.....I want my money back!
89 posted on 06/19/2003 8:01:24 PM PDT by Arpege92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Bookmarked and I hope I can sleep tonight.

I hope there is another Ari Onassis around to rescue her and us. She can become The Queen of an isolated island somewhere near Fiji.
90 posted on 06/19/2003 8:06:44 PM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
My only deviation from your theory is: Bloomberg has the wrong equipment to be strutting around with Hitlery. She needs a more'female' escort...
91 posted on 06/19/2003 8:07:56 PM PDT by Cate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: section9
My prediction is that Guliani finishes her off in '06. He should get the Congressional Medal of Honor if this happens.
92 posted on 06/19/2003 8:24:07 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
she's not going to toss out bill!

their marriage is necessary to feminism. she can whine about bill and women will feel sorry for her.

also, bill is a strategist that she needs for election.
93 posted on 06/19/2003 8:30:15 PM PDT by liberalnot (what democrats fear the most is democracy . /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Hill's strategy is NOT to have to run in the primaries..i.e. to lock it up well before the 2006 election....collect the pledges of support from everyone....BTW..notice now little attention is paid to the recent poll that says that 48% of Dems prefer Hill THIS time....sad commentary oin the rest of the group, eh?
94 posted on 06/20/2003 7:15:48 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: justshe
valid point..except that the OIC pretty much signed off on the end of the investigation..gave them both a pass...you'd have to have hard evidence of a crime, not an accusation..not even a sworn affadavit....and it doesn't exist...
95 posted on 06/20/2003 7:17:50 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: mombonn
I understand you point, and it's valid, but the Hillary could spin it away easily..explain that because she's such a public persona, she needs to reinstitute her "zone of privacy"...she'd be a martyr, forced by Bill's shenanigans to give up her Senate seat....you forget how good they are at manipulation of the media..
96 posted on 06/20/2003 7:20:09 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel
Love your Freeper handle....the show was great, and Mrs. peeel could sure kick ass...re your comments about the dems and the Clintons.....the Dem party sold its soul to the Clinton long ago..it will take an excommunication to remove the stigma of the Clintons from the Dem party....just consider..remember, after the House voted to impeach..all the Dems bussed over to the WH, and they had that huge public ass-kissing of Bill, with Gore proclaiming him the greatest president ever...well, if they'd done the right thing, and called for Bubba to quit..Gore would be president today, and the dems might control both houses of congress....and that's a really scary scenario, isn't it....makes you realize that God really loves this blessed country, he just has a curious way of accomplishing what he wants, eh?
97 posted on 06/20/2003 7:27:45 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: section9
Thanks, as always, for your kind comments...you, most of all, saw through some of the fun stuff I wrote to my underlying thesis..which is that IMHO she has more to lose my running again in 06, than by not running...once one accepts that, then all else can be devolved......regards..
98 posted on 06/20/2003 7:30:11 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
bump .... now that's UGLY
99 posted on 06/20/2003 7:40:31 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: section9
Thunder thighs. Lovin' it. Jus' lovin' it!
100 posted on 06/20/2003 7:45:37 AM PDT by ricpic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson