[martin_fierro]

Bump.

[Grampa Dave]

Thanks for the ping.

The publishers/editors of theleft wing fishwraps continue to drive away conservatives and moderates with their lies, revisionism and pretending that DNC mantras are news and realities.

They love the illegal aliens, the inner city thugs and the poorly educated throngs. The only problem is that these rat voters don't buy newspapers, and many can't read.

Each day they drive away more conservatives and are cutting their throats re circulation and survival.

"Newspapers keep losing conservative readers and keep claiming that they do not have a liberal bias. Since newspapers always tell the truth, the only possible explanation is that conservatives must be a bunch of thick-necked, ignorant, right-wing extremists."

It is a wonderful thing to watch as our enemies destroy themselves.

[Cyber Liberty]

At a recent meeting of the Society of Professional Journalists, a panel of journalists defended the higher use of the word "conservative" to describe conservative think tanks. The panel claimed that conservative think tanks describe themselves as "conservative" or "free market," but liberal think tanks do not describe themselves as "liberal" or "socialist." Based on that rationale, if the Industrial Workers of America or some other widely recognized leftist group is not honest enough to call itself "leftist" or "socialist," reporters would treat the group as politically impartial and not affix a label to it.

I'll do you one better than that. My local paper refers to the Brookings Institution as "the Conservative Brookings Institution". Go figure.