Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Casuals on Left Infect the Right

Posted on 06/23/2003 2:35:19 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March

Obviously, the Left wants everyone to be casual when he or she talks about the Clintons. It's like someone who lets out a table-rattling fart, they hope everyone laughs it off.

But Clinton is no mere passing of the wind. The name, Clinton, deserves many labels: nuclear treason, the Ron Brown coverup [with 35 mysterious deaths], Waco, Vince Foster, pardoning bomb terrorists just prior to 9-11, pardoning crack dealers to line the pockets of his brother-in-law, Tainted Blood, impeachable and power-hungry executive orders, and even the strange death of Betty Currie's brother.

Most conservatives have fallen into a very simple and childish trap. Conservatives caught liberals the way a parent caught a child. The child had just chopped up the family pet with a knife. But when caught, the child laughs. For some perverse reason, the laugh is infectious. The child's laughter makes the parent laugh. Now we are all good friends. Clinton is just 'the sink meister'. All of his past coverups, all of his slime has been candy coated and wrapped in a blue dress.

Just to give you an idea of how bad it is, some conservatives are joking that New York would be better off with the Bomb Terrorist Pardoner than with Bloomberg. If that doesn't marginalize all that Clinton is about, I don't know what does. Why don't we all just say in unison, "We didn't really mean what we said about Clinton?" I can't say that. I mean every word of it. Other people, I suppose, simply look at my kind as some kind of attic fanatic. I guess, in their minds, people like me are just 'useful idiots'. But I know the Truth. The Truth is that Clinton is a lot more dangerous than people think. He places zero value on any life not part of his little, scummy circle. And if you aren't scum, you can't possibly be a member of that circle, unless you are his daughter. I believe Dick Morris. I believe Aldrich's Unlimited Access. I believe Ann Coulter's High Crimes and Misdemeanors. I believe Chris Ruddy.

I think Clinton would be a worse mayor than Marion Berry. If he were put in charge of a dog kennel, he would sell the dogs to satanics for sacrifice if it helped his brother-in-law make a few bucks.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: airplane; aldrich; clinton; crash; crime; croatia; pardon; rino; ronbrown; sold; unlimitedaccess
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 06/23/2003 2:35:20 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: XNavyNuc
Yeah, I'm still kicking... and biting, and scratching at the cyber-face of anyone who has a kind thing to say about the Terrorist Pardoner.
2 posted on 06/23/2003 2:41:13 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (LIBERTY or DEATH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Don't forget him selling plots in Arlington National Cemetery for a donation (later to be exhumed and interned elsewhere).
3 posted on 06/23/2003 2:43:37 AM PDT by rvoitier (There's too many ALs in this world: Al Qaeda Al Jezeera Al Gore Al Sharpton Al Franken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
This is perhaps my biggest beef with the "conservative" Bush administration, their willingness to not pursue any of the Clinton felonies. No one else has better access to the evidence. I considered it part of the mandate of a successful Bush. Instead I get drug benefits for seniors.
4 posted on 06/23/2003 4:01:26 AM PDT by David Isaac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Bu but, it's all about a fat intern, isn't it?
5 posted on 06/23/2003 4:42:37 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Free Nutkin! Bring Ol' Nutty home!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Good point. In the domestic enemy deck of cards, William Jefferson (anti-freedom)Criminal is the ace of spades.
6 posted on 06/23/2003 4:58:29 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
It's like someone who lets out a table-rattling fart, they hope everyone laughs it off.

An incident like this did happen once to 18th century author and wit, Samuel Johnson. Johnson was at a dinner party when a female guest accidentally let out with a LOUD blast. Eveyone at the table pretended not to hear it and the guilty woman scuffed her shoe against the floor as if that was the real source of the noise. At this point, Samuel Johnson commented:

"Madam, we heard you the first time. You need not make it rhyme."

7 posted on 06/23/2003 5:04:36 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Samuel Johnson bump!

http://www.samueljohnson.com/
8 posted on 06/23/2003 5:09:51 AM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
The Clintons are the hottest act under the DNC tent. They are giants compared to John “Thurston Howell III” Kerry, “Little Joe” Lieberman and the other 6 dopey dwarfs.

Bill compels most women to kneel before him and bare their breasts. HILLARYS! boundless intellect makes them swoon with mindless adoration. Even their week-kneed, spineless, golfing husbands buy into their sh_t!

Pity the people who think the Clintons are gone... for they know not what they speak.

9 posted on 06/23/2003 5:32:17 AM PDT by johnny7 (“Tis a long way twix the cup and the lip.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
No. The Clintons aren't going anywhere for a long while. The only thing that will further tarnish their imagine as the leaders of their corrupt and brainless party is outright defeat and humiliation.

That is why we have to win, why we have to expand our numbers in the Senate and House. We have to hand them defeat after defeat, because we know that they aren't going away unless they're forced to.

When is was obvious to everyone that Clinton was engaged in high-level espionage with our nuclear laboratories, no one did anything. The lesson that we've learned is that we can't rely on the FBI, the Republicans, anyone in government to look out for the interests of this great country. We have to do this ourselves. We have to send the rapacious and lying Clintons packing.

10 posted on 06/23/2003 6:27:37 AM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary
"We" enabled the Clintons when "we" kicked Bush out of office in '92. "We" still don't know the full extent of the damage they caused during their 8 years in our White House, not to mention the damage they will cause in the Senate and any other offices they might hold.
11 posted on 06/23/2003 6:37:24 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
I believe Dick Morris. I believe Aldrich's Unlimited Access. I believe Ann Coulter's High Crimes and Misdemeanors. I believe Chris Ruddy.

So do I. I guess that means I'm in the attic with you.....

12 posted on 06/23/2003 6:42:54 AM PDT by b4its2late (Strip Mining Prevents Forest Fires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
"He places zero value on any life not part of his little, scummy circle"

This may not be the official, textbook definition of a "sociopath"...but it is close.

--Boris

13 posted on 06/23/2003 6:53:24 AM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: David Isaac
I personally feel that the reason Bush has not gone after the Clintonites is because he knows that too much of the media is still in their back pockets and that the Clintons would get a boost from the victim factor that the media would hand them. While I don't like letting these rats off the hook, I think our president knows what he's up against and is handling it just right. He's enabling more and more people to see the Clintons for who they are by having them contrast their "accomplishments" and "character" with his.
14 posted on 06/23/2003 6:57:59 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Consort
I don't think we know the full extent of the damage they've done, either. We do know that while they were in office a worldwide terror network was established with the express purpose of killing Americans. Clinton did nothing, preferring instead to hustle our nuclear arsenal for campaign contributions.

I don't attribute decent motives to these people. The evidence to the contrary is too compelling. We have to defeat them completely.

15 posted on 06/23/2003 6:58:08 AM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Well written, and accurate. The perjuring rapist traitor's crimes should never be forgotten. The rottenness of his regime should be held up as an example of what Americans should NEVER tolerate.
16 posted on 06/23/2003 7:14:05 AM PDT by jimt (Never let the facts get in the way of a good slur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: David Isaac
It gets even worse than that. There are numerous Clinton undead walking the halls of the Justice Dept,, the State Dept., and all of the other government agencies. It's been over two years, and Bush and comapny have done absolutely nothing to remove these people. So, instead of a real change we get Ted Kennedy's expansion of the Education bureaucracy, talking tough on "Affirmative Action" while filing a brief advocating its continuance, leaving our borders unprotected while increasing federal snooping on US Citizens, the continued transfer of sensitive military technology to China, 15 billion for handing out condoms in Africa, and now (as you mentioned) as vast new entitlement.

If this is conservatism, will someone please tell me how it differs from big-government liberalism?
17 posted on 06/23/2003 7:19:59 AM PDT by Bogolyubski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier
What is the full story on that? What was the extent of the service for those he had buried in Arlington and that really is more of an outrage, but the media are always there to make sure it doesn't get the exposure it deserves in showing how corrupt the Clintoons were that is beyond the Lewinsky affair.
18 posted on 06/23/2003 9:00:55 AM PDT by bushfamfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan
Shouldn't have made it plural cuz I remember there only being one. Come to think of it, the hound-dog was bangin' his wife, too.
19 posted on 06/23/2003 9:21:47 AM PDT by rvoitier (There's too many ALs in this world: Al Qaeda Al Jezeera Al Gore Al Sharpton Al Franken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier; All
[sorry for my late response]

Ah, Larry Liar Lawrence, former US Naval amabassadore to Switzerland? The guy who claimed to be a merchant marine during WW2 and then it was found out he never was one? Having taken up precious space in Arlington... gee nobody remembers that one anymore. I think it was buried first by Cogwell's Ron Brown photos, and then both were buried by a blue dress. Amazing, isn't it? So much anger was stirred up by Larry Liar Lawrence that he was exhumed. We were talking about digging him up, ourselves. FReegards....
20 posted on 06/25/2003 2:02:56 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (LIBERTY or DEATH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson