Skip to comments.
The Great "Gay" Con
The Washington Dispatch
| June 23, 2003
| Patrick Rooney
Posted on 06/23/2003 2:13:00 PM PDT by Cathryn Crawford
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-116 next last
To: Scenic Sounds
I have no personal knowledge regarding its accuracy, Just invented for fictional entertainment reading purposes huh? That isnt logical is it?
but again, it's before the Sixties.
It was the gay nineties, thats the 1890s and not gay in its current meaning, when the first openly public support for homosexuality began by European intellectual elites. And the sixties in the article is referring to the sexual revolution and is accurate in doing so.
To: Clint N. Suhks; Cathryn Crawford
It was the gay nineties, thats the 1890s and not gay in its current meaning, when the first openly public support for homosexuality began by European intellectual elites.See, Cathryn, here's still another historical view. Again, before the Sixties!
And the sixties in the article is referring to the sexual revolution and is accurate in doing so.
The "real" sexual revolution began in the Fifties, not the Sixties! The folks were like rabbits back in the Fifties.
62
posted on
06/23/2003 5:11:40 PM PDT
by
Scenic Sounds
(Just trying to escape this ugly June gloom, these clouds in A minor, and this vague sense of doom.)
To: Clint N. Suhks; Scenic Sounds
Just invented for fictional entertainment reading purposes huh? Well...since he was alive at that point, I guess he has plenty of knowledge about it.
63
posted on
06/23/2003 5:15:23 PM PDT
by
Cathryn Crawford
(I'm not prejudiced - I hate everybody equally.)
To: Cathryn Crawford; Clint N. Suhks
Well...since he was alive at that point, I guess he has plenty of knowledge about it.Well, that could be. Who knows? You know, not everyone was invited to the Sexual Revolution. ;-)
64
posted on
06/23/2003 5:31:02 PM PDT
by
Scenic Sounds
(Just trying to escape this ugly June gloom, these clouds in A minor, and this vague sense of doom.)
To: netmilsmom
OK that just made my Husband Puke.
65
posted on
06/23/2003 5:48:15 PM PDT
by
JonathansMommie
(How are inlaws different from out laws? Out laws Are wanted!!)
Comment #66 Removed by Moderator
To: Cathryn Crawford
Women don't get off on watching men - we think it's just about the nastiest thing we can think of.Definitely. I am also creeped out by the girl/girl thing, although I can tolerate watching it more than I can two men together. That's the worst.
To: Cathryn Crawford
Language being important, the word homosexual was overthrown, and replaced with the happy word gay.
------------------------
Gay is short for "gay Lothario." It was coineed by gays.
68
posted on
06/23/2003 6:57:11 PM PDT
by
RLK
To: jmc813
What you said.
69
posted on
06/23/2003 7:22:35 PM PDT
by
LibertarianInExile
(this tag line was seized by the T.S.A.--it had a point)
To: Scenic Sounds
You just have no idea how much damage
was done to this country by those Rolling Beatles. ;-)
Is it true Paul McCartney was in a group before Wings? ;)
70
posted on
06/23/2003 7:50:19 PM PDT
by
gcruse
To: gcruse
Is it true Paul McCartney was in a group before Wings? ;)The real Paul McCartney died in a car crash before his "substitute" later formed Wings. The real Paul McCartney couldn't play bass worth a damn. :-)
71
posted on
06/23/2003 7:53:44 PM PDT
by
Scenic Sounds
(Just trying to escape this ugly June gloom, these clouds in A minor, and this vague sense of doom.)
To: Cathryn Crawford
72
posted on
06/23/2003 7:57:13 PM PDT
by
Salem
(FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas!)
To: Cathryn Crawford
Even today, the average person still cringes when they see two men mouth-kissing one another. The truth is, the practice is innately abhorrent Sigh. Religionoids make stuff up like this and then cite is as fact. If this guy would crawl out of his cave from time to time he would find out that there are cultures where a greeting between two men includes a mouth on mouth kiss.
73
posted on
06/23/2003 8:05:29 PM PDT
by
jlogajan
To: jmc813
That's why government should get out of both health care and marriage IMO. Exactly. The state has no business defining marriage of any sort, other than to recognize any voluntarily entered contractual relationship.
74
posted on
06/23/2003 8:07:09 PM PDT
by
jlogajan
To: Cathryn Crawford
GOOD ARTICLE.
THANKS.
I would quibble slightly with the kissing thing, though.
A number of cultures--particularly in the middle east--include men kissing on the lips much as a hello handshake and good bye rigual.
It can be disconcerting at first. But the incidence of homosexuality in those cultures is likely at least not higher than in cultures where the practice is absent.
The key, to me, would be--what's going on in the mind and elsewhere in the bodies of the parties doing the kissing.
Of course, at some point, mouth kissing can become--what was the Golden Pond term--suck face kissing. That's not what I'm talking about!!!
Part of me still suspects--without stats as I know no suitable research with stats--but part of me still suspects that cultures in which men are routinely and healthily affectionate WITHOUT BEING homosexual should logically have FEWER homosexuals.
Particularly so, given that so much of it seems like a desperate perversion trying to recover affection from Dad that never occurred at critical psyche/personality forming early years.
75
posted on
06/23/2003 8:16:30 PM PDT
by
Quix
(FAIR MINDED & INTERESTED--please watch UFO special Tues eve & share opinions)
To: Cathryn Crawford
Well...since he was alive at that point, I guess he has plenty of knowledge about it. Scenic Sounds was alive when Leviticus and Romans were written?
To: jlogajan
If this guy would crawl out of his cave from time to time he would find out that there are cultures where a greeting between two men includes a mouth on mouth kiss. Sigh
do you know the difference between sexual and plutonic, a kiss an "kissing"?
To: jlogajan
The state has no business defining marriage of any sortCompelling states interest maybe?
other than to recognize any voluntarily entered contractual relationship.
Why? Try going to a lawyer for your contracts outside of marriage, I hear they are very helpful.
To: Scenic Sounds
The folks were like rabbits back in the Fifties. That case can be made after every war ever fought and is more true in the late 40s than it was in the 50s. Historically the sexual revolution started in the late 60s with the feminist movement
burning bras etc.
To: Scenic Sounds; Clint N. Suhks
The "real" sexual revolution began in the Fifties, not the Sixties! The folks were like rabbits back in the Fifties. The 1950s had Hugh Hefner and Kinsey. A revolution needs its leaders.
LSD existed in the 1950s but it took Timothy Leary on the East coast and Ken Kesey on the West coast to make it an indulgence.
80
posted on
06/23/2003 9:03:24 PM PDT
by
weegee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson