[Dr. Frank fan]

I have no idea what the hell you're talking about, and I do not believe you do either. For one thing, you do not seem to have actually read the article you're commenting under. I still don't understand where did he say anything about Waco? Where did he say he's not a conservative? Where did he "confuse the state as an extension of himself"?

Perhaps there is a simple error to explain why you keep putting irrelevant comments underneath this article which have nothing whatsoever to do with this article. Let me know,

[JohnGalt]

State as extension of self:

"After the September 2001 terror attacks, we were faced with two options."


Not a Conservative:

After setting the (false) dichotimy of his 'two options' scenario, not one of his policy presciption had anything to do with issuing letters of marque and reprisal, insuring a well-armed citizenry, or decentralizing the state. He did not even suggest stripping pensions from the intelligence community heirarchy who so miserably failed their jobs.

RE: Waco. I asked as a curiosity: is this was patriot talking or simply a militarist? When he replies to my e-mail, I'll let you know.