[ElkGroveDan]

Now you have a different opinion but if your complaint is solely along Constitutional grounds, you are mistaken. You may have religious or ideological reasons -- but that is different than Constitutional reasons.

Actually you are the one who is mistaken. There is no consitutional right to privacy. My views on the act in question aren't relevant to a constitutional discussion. (but if you must know I think it's vile, immoral and disgusting.)

[jlogajan]

There is no consitutional right to privacy.

But there is. You may not like that the Court is Constitutionally given the necessary power to interpret the Constitution -- but they have been -- and therefore their decisions are the law of the land, unless challenged by the legistlative, executive, and citizens of the US -- primarily by Constitutional amendment.

Procedure was properly followed -- at least to the point that no amendment seems to be arising from the other branches.

If you accept the Constitution, you have to accept the procedures it lays out for its interpretation and enforcement.

[Chancellor Palpatine]

So, do hetero married couples have the right to such acts in their own bedrooms, or should the states criminalize what they do?

Your personal tendency to say "ewwwww" really shouldn't dictate what the law is for consenting adults.

[DAnconia55]

There is no consitutional right to privacy.

Is it explicitly stated as a power of government?

Nope.
Guess what? That means they don't have any right to infringe on our privacy.