Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Bush Signs 'Keeping Children and Families Safe Act of 2003'
Home School Legal Defense Assoc. ^ | HSLDA

Posted on 06/30/2003 10:11:00 AM PDT by hsmomx3

President Bush, yesterday, signed the Keeping Children and Families Safe Act of 2003 (S.342). The new law will help protect innocent families against overly intrusive social workers. "Over the years thousands of homeschool families have been victimized by social workers operating on nothing more than a tip from an unknown stranger," said Michael Farris, General Counsel for Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA). Michael Farris joined President Bush along with Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson, Senator Judd Gregg, House Majority Leader Tom Delay and Representatives Boehner and Hoekstra for the signing ceremony, which was held in the Oval Office.

The Keeping Children and Families Safe Act reauthorizes and modifies the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) and related law. These programs generally support activities to prevent and treat child abuse and family violence. In his statement the signing President Bush said, "I commend Congress for passing the Keeping Children and Families Safe Act of 2003 and am pleased to sign it into law. The Act will allow us to strengthen state and community-based programs that prevent child abuse and family violence and treat victims."

HSLDA believes those who abuse children should be severely punished. Yet in its 20-year history, HSLDA has handled thousands of cases arising from anonymous tips made to social workers concerning the conduct of homeschooling families. These tips, often supplied by those holding a grudge against home education, are often investigated aggressively. Social workers frequently demand to inspect the bodies of homeschool children or to interview very young children outside the presence of their parents.

"Such aggressiveness, in a system which presumes guilt, can result in needless pain and anxiety for families," said Farris.

HSLDA championed three new changes in S.342. First, social workers will now be required to tell families the nature of the accusations against them at their first contact. With this information, families will be able to legally challenge the social worker and demand that a warrant be obtained before interviews or investigations are conducted. Since warrants can only issue from a judge on the basis of probable cause, overzealous cases can now be efficiently weeded out.

The second provision will require that social workers be provided with additional training in the constitutional rights of citizens. Social workers will be advised that the Constitution protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures. The third pertains to citizen advisory boards which can hear complaints against overly aggressive social workers.

In November 2001, HSLDA Senior Counsel, Chris Klicka, testified before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce Subcommittee on Select Education about this legislation. His testimony was influential in convincing the subcommittee to add these significant amendments to the bill.

"With these provisions clearly showing the intent of Congress, families in all 50 states will have more protection from overly aggressive social workers," said Klicka. "This is a breakthrough for parents' rights and will enable HSLDA to be better armed to defend members families."

HSLDA will be working with both the federal Health and Human Services Department and with the state legislatures to implement and codify this new language.


TOPICS: Announcements; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrine; children; cps; homeschooling; hslda

1 posted on 06/30/2003 10:11:00 AM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
This is certainly a step in the right direction. Having done battle with the CPS jackals when they came after children related to me, I know how overzealous they are and how they will willingly step all over the rights of everyone involved. I will have to add the language of this bill to my "first contact" card that I would use if CPS ever knocks on my door. Add the relevant parts of this law to the other court precedents and you can ward off all but the most determined CPS jackals. (Well, first and foremost you have to not abuse your children, of course.)
2 posted on 06/30/2003 10:21:05 AM PDT by Spiff (Liberalism is a mental illness - a precursor disease to terminal Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom
Homeschoolers v. Social services -- Legal protections.
3 posted on 06/30/2003 10:23:20 AM PDT by ibheath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
It's about time someone did something about these freaks. Now if we can just do the same to the EPA and the IRS.
4 posted on 06/30/2003 10:24:21 AM PDT by Sofa King (-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Tom Daschle, Hillary, and the rest of the Village Experts are deeply saddened.
5 posted on 06/30/2003 10:24:47 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ibheath; All; everyone; SOMEONE; Everybody; Kim_in_Tulsa; diotima; TxBec; SLB; BibChr; JenB; ...
Thank you for pinging me!

PING!!
6 posted on 06/30/2003 10:32:14 AM PDT by 2Jedismom (HHD with 4 Chickens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
But they left out the most important part, the acknowledgment of the RIGHT of the victims of these CPS a$$#*le$ to pursue civil and/or criminal action against these CPS jerks.
7 posted on 06/30/2003 11:10:41 AM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nomad
Well there is still old fashion justice, just meet them after school so to speak.
8 posted on 06/30/2003 11:12:11 AM PDT by samuel_adams_us
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
This is certainly a step in the right direction.

Only a baby step. IMHO, CPS should get out of the investigation business and only provide for placement and care of children who are truly abused. Let the local police take care of investigations. If abuse is indicated, the parents should be charged with criminal charges and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

As it stands now, CPS too often files civil charges that the parent cannot afford to defend themselves against. This is a blatent violation of Constitutional Rights as you can be falsely and anonymously accused and your children can be seized without probable cause. You are denied a jury trial, the right to face your accusers and the right to provide witnesses on your behalf. You are assumed guilty, the burden of proof is on you, hearsay is admissable in court and the caseworkers have no qualms about lying in court. More info on this can be found at FightCPS.com

9 posted on 06/30/2003 11:17:16 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
The second provision will require that social workers be provided with additional training in the constitutional rights of citizens. Social workers will be advised that the Constitution protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures.

This is barely better than nothing. Giving "additional training" to government-funded crusaders is hardly going to protect parents. As long as these people have immunity from most lawsuits related to their abuse of parents' rights, what's the downside for them?

If the legislators were serious about reforming this system, they would define and criminalize child abuse, allow professional investigators, otherwise known as police to do the investigation, and strip away the immunity from social workers who try to exorcise their own emotional demons by illegally ripping families apart.

10 posted on 06/30/2003 11:25:02 AM PDT by SoulStorms (That which grows in shadow, and withers in the light of day, does not belong on the vine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
I'm in one hundred percent agreement. The two CPS cases wherin I had the most involvement with helping the families being investigated by CPS prove this out.

In one case, we tried to work within the CPS system to fight the allegation and keep the kids out of CPS clutches. We failed utterly. The kangaroo courts ensure that everything is stacked against the innocent parents. In that case the kids ended up spending 3 years out of the home in foster care when, in the end, CPS finally admitted that the charges were unsubstantiated and released the now every damaged children back to their parents. Lesson learned, you can't work within the CPS system - you will lose.

In the second case, having learned that important lesson, we kept the children away from CPS (no manufacturing of evidence or fishing expeditions by caseworkers and "therapists"), immediately brought in a competent attorney willing to go to the mattress with CPS, and we pushed everything into criminal court as soon as possible. The finding of innocence was pretty much a foregone conclusion (gosh, those darned rights sure do get in the way of an overzealous or crooked caseworker) and the kids were never touched by CPS.

On a sidenote, we went back to sue the caseworker, her supervisor, and everyone else involved for violating the family's rights and when we attempted to obtain the court transcripts AND audio recordings wherein the caseworker and her supervisor openly committed perjury numerous times in court, the tapes were blank and the transcripts were lost. The trial was in 2002 and the stuff was gone within months. The system is corrupt through and through and families are daily being destroyed by it.

11 posted on 06/30/2003 11:26:50 AM PDT by Spiff (Liberalism is a mental illness - a precursor disease to terminal Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SoulStorms
If the legislators were serious about reforming this system, they would define and criminalize child abuse, allow professional investigators, otherwise known as police to do the investigation, and strip away the immunity from social workers who try to exorcise their own emotional demons by illegally ripping families apart.

Not the roll of the Federal Government, but your sentiment is correct. In reality, this has mostly been done in various state laws and court precedents the problem is that most people are ignorant of those laws and precedents as are their attorneys. A good attorney will force CPS to file an actual criminal charge and then push the issue over to law enforcement who usually have to follow the laws and protect the rights of the falsely accused. I'm not saying that there isn't corrupt police who will make things worse, but I do know that your chances are better once you get things out of the unfair CPS system and into the criminal courts.

12 posted on 06/30/2003 11:30:13 AM PDT by Spiff (Liberalism is a mental illness - a precursor disease to terminal Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Here is an update on Massachusetts:

http://www.dailynewstranscript.com/news/local_regional/walt_bryants06202003.htm
13 posted on 06/30/2003 12:05:33 PM PDT by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson