Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Politician Arnie's right up there with the best of them (opening shot from socialist mouthpiece)
The Guardian (UK) ^ | July 4 2003 | Rod Liddle

Posted on 07/03/2003 3:41:18 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie

The lousiest Hollywood actors always did make good Republicans, writes Rod Liddle.

The Hollywood actor Arnold Schwarzenegger is apparently contemplating running for political office. To students of the correlation between acting ability and political sympathy among thespians, it will come as no surprise that Arnie is a Republican.

The rule is almost - although not quite - inviolable. In general, the worse you are as an actor, the more right-wing your politics will be.

There is a formidable rollcall of guileless, wooden dunderheads on Hollywood's right. Charlton Heston, surely one of the worst actors alive, is not merely a Republican but a leading member of the perfectly horrible National Rifle Association. To his name can be added the, um, somewhat one-dimensional John Wayne; the weird, stone-faced pout of Demi Moore and her ex, Bruce Willis; the lumbering Sylvester Stallone; Bob Hope; the astonishingly unfunny George Burns; Frank Sinatra, once his talent and looks had gone; good ol' lovable, one-paced Jimmy Stewart (who was very, very, very right-wing indeed); and, of course - lest we forget - Ronald Reagan.

The only exception I can think of is John Malkovich, who is unquestionably a fine actor. His politics, though, are too idiosyncratic to be described simply as right of centre. And Clint Eastwood, maybe.

I suppose some people might still carry a torch for Sophia Loren and Brigitte Bardot. But Loren merely shagged right-wing men without ever seeming to be especially right-wing. And poor old Bardot's apparent conversion to the extreme far-right Front Nationale seems to be simply more evidence of a burgeoning eccentricity.

Whereas the Hollywood left - well, where to start? The wonderful Burt Lancaster, Robert Mitchum, Katharine Hepburn and Humphrey Bogart, maybe. Woody Allen and Mel Brooks. Montgomery Clift, Gregory Peck, Robert Redford, Warren Beatty, Paul Newman, Martin Sheen, Shirley MacLaine, Jane and Peter Fonda. And Jessica Lange and Emmanuelle Beart ... the list is almost endless. Why?

I suspect it is something to do with the collaborative process of film acting; the shared performance and, maybe, the necessity to, temporarily perhaps, subjugate the ego and empathise with the subject. If it is not too pretentious an extrapolation, it's the communitarian demands of acting that are best suited to those of a vaguely socialistic ideology.

With writing, precisely the reverse seems to be true. Writing is a selfish and individualistic occupation and I would argue that the most brilliant and concentrated writing of the past century has come from the right - often the far right. Who, these days, reads those early scions of the radical left, Jack London and Sinclair Lewis? George Orwell and John Steinbeck are both revered more for their humanity and compassion than their ability to write a beautiful sentence.

The most left-wing of novelists - Edward Upward, for example - are impossible to read, except as unwitting satires, and in poetry you would not cross the road to buy anything by Neruda, Mayakovsky or, for that matter, Stephen Spender. But you would for that high Tory T.S. Eliot and the Mussolini-obsessive Ezra Pound.

By and large, the more individualistic and self-obsessed, the better the writing. It is the battle between the tormented genius of Dostoevsky - whom we still read - and the ghastly Leninist social realism of Mikhail Sholokhov, who these days is unreadable, surely (and, in fact, much of his stuff is out of print, despite the fact that he won the Nobel Prize).

And as I say, some of the best writing has come from very, very, far to the right. Louis-Ferdinand Celine was an anti-Semitic crypto-Nazi. Knut Hamsun the same, except without the crypto bit. T.E. Lawrence, Jean Cocteau, Wyndham Lewis, Jean Genet and D.H. Lawrence have all stood the test of time rather well.

We can argue about D.H. Lawrence but the rest most definitely dressed to the right. I suppose you might allege that I'm having my cake and eating it if I say that Ernest Hemingway wrote like a right-winger while voting left.

There are, again, exceptions - Emile Zola and Graham Greene, certainly. And, arguably, that old bore Sartre, who is still, unaccountably, held in high esteem.

Anyway, it's only a theory. And worse, a theory formed in a few moments of terror while forced to contemplate the possibility of Scwarzenegger's ascent to the highest of high offices. At least with Reagan we knew that, at worst, he might start to relive Bedtime for Bonzo and other such harmless, witless hokum. But a US president who starts recalling lines from Terminator and Predator is something else again.

Watch out, Iran.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: ahnold; arnold; california; schwarzenegger; schwarznegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
An early taste of what we can expect from the Left, if Arnie Schwarznegger threatens their boy in CA.
1 posted on 07/03/2003 3:41:19 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
The lousiest Hollywood actors always did make good Republicans, writes Rod Liddle.

<|:)~

2 posted on 07/03/2003 3:43:59 PM PDT by martin_fierro (A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Really, how could Arnold threaten the left? He is a nephew by marriage to St. EMK, and he shares the liberal agenda down to the last item. His "Republicanism" is a mere label.
3 posted on 07/03/2003 3:44:32 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Sometimes not playing is the only way to win.
4 posted on 07/03/2003 3:45:29 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
..really, how could Arnold threaten the left?...

Two strikes. His movies represent the triumph of individual effort over collective will. That's an unsettling image for the Left, which makes it impossible for them to accept him as trustworthy.

Plus, the peasantry enjoy his films.

5 posted on 07/03/2003 3:48:34 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Thanks for posting this.

"If it is not too pretentious an extrapolation, it's the communitarian demands of acting that are best suited to those of a vaguely socialistic ideology."

Yes, it is too pretentious an extrapolation. I am sure Republicans can work in groups just as well as Democrats can, if not better.

Ridiculous!
6 posted on 07/03/2003 3:51:27 PM PDT by proud American in Canada ("We are a peaceful people. Yet we are not a fragile people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
But a US president who starts recalling lines from Terminator and Predator is something else again.

The fact that AS is a naturalized citizen and cannot be President indicates how seriously this author's "theory" should be taken.

7 posted on 07/03/2003 3:52:47 PM PDT by TN4Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
The lousiest Hollywood actors always did make good Republicans, writes Rod Liddle.

,,, the lousiest British journos stay right where they're at.

8 posted on 07/03/2003 3:54:08 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Films are fiction. Arnold believes in the entire liberal agenda. He just shows a little individuality by wearing the "R" instead of the "D" label.
9 posted on 07/03/2003 3:56:41 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TN4Liberty
...the fact that AS is a naturalized citizen and cannot be President indicates how seriously this author's "theory" should be taken...

Good point. Obviously, the Guardian's editors rushed this one to print without even checking its basic premise. Fear made their wings beat too fast?

10 posted on 07/03/2003 3:58:20 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
",,, the lousiest British journos stay right where they're at."

BWAHAHAHAHAH! Correcto!
11 posted on 07/03/2003 3:58:57 PM PDT by kiriath_jearim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
...Arnold believes in the entire liberal agenda...

Hang on a minute.

Is my recollection correct, of a lengthy Schwarzenegger interview posted on FR, describing how his hard work, belief in himself, and the opportunity only available in America, overcame language difficulties to make him a huge success? That doesn't sound too liberal, to me. That kind of attitude doesn't go over well in the Dem village.

12 posted on 07/03/2003 4:01:34 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Odd that such a well researched piece would exclude Robert Duvall or Morgan Freeman from it's list.But it also excluded Cary Grant,Clark Gable,Fred Astaire,William Holden,Irene Dunne,George C. Scott....all major no talents, the bunch of them.All right wingers, too.
13 posted on 07/03/2003 4:03:23 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TN4Liberty
Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger

Arnold is born on 30 July 1947 in Thal (4 miles from Graz), Austria.

14 posted on 07/03/2003 4:03:37 PM PDT by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
At least he was right about Celine. The broken clock is still right twice a day..
15 posted on 07/03/2003 4:09:35 PM PDT by HassanBenSobar (Member, amalgamated association of morons, local 6 7/8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HassanBenSobar
It comes as a big suprise to me that Cocteau and Genet were on the Right...
16 posted on 07/03/2003 4:13:34 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Oh my what a bunch of mean spirited delusional crap.
17 posted on 07/03/2003 4:16:58 PM PDT by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
..oh my what a bunch of mean spirited delusional crap...

Sure. You could same the same thing about every Guardian op ed piece, of course.

18 posted on 07/03/2003 4:29:07 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Maybe those that play at make believe, are by a large majority STUPID. That is why most actors and actresses lean so far to the left, that they would fall off the earth if you yelled boo at them. Those that played themselves, and seemed happy and tended to stay married, had all the brains in Hollywood. The one that gripes me the worst, is Jimmy Stewart. He was a fine actor, a great one at times. He beats Tom Hanks all to heck. Guess the author never watched very many movies with Mr. Stewart in them, maybe he would change his mind, but I doubt it. This man is obviously one of the majority of idiots, that belongs on the left coast.
19 posted on 07/03/2003 4:56:42 PM PDT by jeremiah (Sunshine scares all of them, for they all are cockaroaches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Who, these days, reads those early scions of the radical left, Jack London and Sinclair Lewis?

Uhh, has this author ever read any Jack London? Especially his South Seas short stories. By most standards, his philosophy, at least on race, would be only a small step to the left of Hitler.

20 posted on 07/03/2003 5:09:44 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson