All very well and good, but please respond to the logical trail.
1. Boris says that asserting free will is asserting that "my outputs are not functions of my inputs."
2. To which "Xm177e2" responds that there is a "mechanism" (a black box) which "processes" other things--things other than inputs.
3. To which Boris replies that those other things look suspiciously like "inputs"--for else how would the "mechanism" "process" them? Here we have a mechanism that processes something other than inputs; exceeding strange.
4. Boris adds that either the "mechanism" operates by rules (an 'algorithm' for brevity) or it does not. If it does, it cannot be free. If it does not, it cannot be free because it is random (unruled).
So the ball is back in your corner.
--Boris
This tends to be where the devotee of Information Theory as Ontological Essence Dogma posits that all is randomness, somehow formed by an unexplained presence of energy and divergence, out of uniformity and somehow then formulating itself into patterns, that we call "behavior."
That's certainly not a belief that I share. I doubt you'll find many epileptics who do, either.