Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The hidden microphones Stalin used to shape the rebuilding of post-war Europe (Bugged FDR!)
Scottsman.com ^ | 7/5/2003 | Alex Massie

Posted on 07/05/2003 11:29:25 PM PDT by ex-Texan

The hidden microphones Stalin used to shape the rebuilding of post-war Europe (Bugged FDR!)

JOSEPH Stalin was not a man to leave anything to chance. Years of eliminating his opponents and protecting himself from potential challengers had instilled a keen sense of self-preservation in the Soviet dictator and bred, as poker players put it, an unwillingness to ever "give a sucker an even break". One of those suckers, it turns out, was Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the United States president.

A new study has revealed in devastating detail how Stalin bugged FDR’s quarters during the 1945 conference at Yalta that determined the map of post-war Europe.

In an article published in the latest edition of Studies in Intelligence, the journal of the US’s intelligence community, Gary Kern writes that Stalin "had the American president pinned, examined, and analysed like a specimen under a magnifying glass".

The Soviet leader knew every move, every gambit the Americans and British would make at Yalta, and could plan his responses accordingly. The US, argues Mr Kern, walked into a surveillance trap.

What’s more, it did so twice. In 1943, the allies, Stalin, FDR and Winston Churchill, had met in Tehran, where Stalin engineered the conference so that FDR would stay in the Soviet delegation’s compound where his conversations could be monitored easily.

At Yalta, FDR was billeted at the Livadia Palace, a former summer retreat of the tsars, where Stalin’s security service, the NKVD installed a sophisticated network of hidden microphones, ensuring that no American conversations would be missed.

The US delegation ought to have known what to expect, since a security sweep at the American embassy in Moscow the year before had uncovered no fewer than 120 listening devices.

But it was not just the Americans who were under surveillance.

According to Mr Kern: "The British delegation settled down in the Vorontsov Palace, 20 miles distant, where accommodations were equally attentive. In a story with two versions - either Churchill said that lemon juice would go nicely with his gin and tonic or his daughter, Sarah, said that lemon juice would go nicely with the caviare - the British woke up the next day to find a lemon tree growing on the ground."

"It’s bizarre. They say everything, in the fullest detail," Stalin told Sergo Beria, the son of his chief of police who was employed as an intelligence analyst at Tehran and Yalta, summarising the nature and subject manner of the conversations of the US delegation.

Mr Beria recalled in 1998 that even FDR’s outdoor conversations were secretly taped. "As we already had a system for directing the microphones to a distance of 50 to 100 metres to listen, [and] as there was no background noise, everything was quiet," he said. "All these conversations recorded very well, and later on were translated and processed."

Getting up at six each morning, Mr Beria prepared summaries of the overheard conversations; then he met with Stalin at 8am.

"Stalin was interested not only in what was said, but also in how it was said: He wanted to know the intonation, the length of pauses, and the tone of voice of the American speakers," writes Mr Kern, who served in the CIA directorate of operations for more than 35 years.

"According to Beria, Stalin prepared very carefully for each day’s session, assembling all the reports from his intelligence team."

FDR’s benign and rational view of Stalin proved to be one of his last, and arguably greatest, mistakes, even if it was to some extent rooted in the practical realities of power politics. As the historian Hugh Brogan puts it: "He knew that it was mere sentimentalism, given the actual balance of forces, to talk as if the United States could or would impose its policies on the USSR in matters of vital interest to the latter.

"He said repeatedly that America would never fight Russia just for the liberties of Eastern Europeans ... instead he favoured friendly persuasion. He hoped, by constantly exhibiting frank, warm and honest collaboration to the Russians, to induce them to modify the full rigour of their policy and to persuade the Poles, Lithuanians and others to accept the fact of Russian hegemony."

By trusting too much in the charm and persuasive powers of his own personality at Yalta, FDR, argues Mr Kern, misjudged his adversary and was guilty of allowing himself to be cheated by the dictator.

The communique issued at Yalta proclaimed "the establishment of order in Europe and the rebuilding of national economic life ... which will enable the liberated peoples to destroy the last vestiges of Nazism and fascism and to create democratic institutions of their own choice."

But far from freeing the continent from dictatorship, Yalta cleft Europe in two, paving the way for the Cold War.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: fdrwasbugged; stalin; wwii; yalta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 07/05/2003 11:29:25 PM PDT by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Having Alger Hiss, known Communist spy, at FDR's side all during that time probably helped as well.

FDR was a failure as a president, both in domestic and in foreign affairs. Don't expect the media to report this though.

2 posted on 07/05/2003 11:38:43 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HISSKGB; DPB101; nopardons
Stalin and FDR ping
3 posted on 07/05/2003 11:40:52 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Overkill. Stalin just about ran the Democratic Party at the time. Those--such as Patton, Hoover, Chambers and Forrestal--who knew what was going on, got nowhere.
4 posted on 07/05/2003 11:42:49 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ikka; ex-Texan
He had Eleanor to encourage the benign attitude,too.
5 posted on 07/05/2003 11:45:14 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Mr Beria recalled in 1998 that even FDR’s outdoor conversations were secretly taped.

Really? The Soviet Union had audio tape recorders in 1945?

6 posted on 07/05/2003 11:45:46 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
"FDR’s benign and rational view of Stalin proved to be one of his last, and arguably greatest, mistakes, even if it was to some extent rooted in the practical realities of power politics."

This was not difficult to decipher at the time. A lot of us were suspicious when ol' FDR reared back one day and said "...some of my best friends are communists."

Our suspicions were confirmed when FDR allowed Stalin to take over the countries of central Europe as though they were conquered nations. He had no right to allow that, but then, he was a very sick man. (another fact neatly kept from us by the adoring, subversive socialist media)

The capper, however, was when Stalin toasted FDR as a fool right to his face there at Yalta and FDR raised his glass and smiled as though he had been complinented. He was one sorry SOB.

7 posted on 07/05/2003 11:51:57 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver
Ann Coulter, Treason, page 18:
A friend of Chambers had arranged a private audience with President Roosevelt's assistant secretary of state, Adolf Berle. After dinner, at Berle's home, Chambers spend several hours detailing the Communist espionage network of which he had been a part. He gave Berle the names of at least two dozen Soviet spies working for the Roosevelt administration. Among them was Alger Hiss, a top State Department official, as well as his brother, Donald Hiss. Berle urgently reported to President Roosevelt what Chambers had said, including the warning about Alger Hiss. The president laughed and told Berle to go f___ himself. No action was even taken against Hiss. To the contrary, Roosevelt promoted Hiss to the position of trusted aide who would go on to advise him at Yalta. . . William C. Bullitt, former ambassador to Russia...(also)...brought the news to Roosevelt's attention. He too, was laughed off.

8 posted on 07/05/2003 11:59:53 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Everyone's already said what I would have. LOL

FDR was dying, at Yalta, to boot, BTW.

9 posted on 07/06/2003 12:01:30 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
So did we.
10 posted on 07/06/2003 12:02:11 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ikka
FDR=KREEP
11 posted on 07/06/2003 12:02:35 AM PDT by RIGHT IN SEATTLE (SIGN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
From The Mitrokhin Archive and the Secret History of the KGB:
(The Soviets) saw a bright future for Michael Straight [codenamed NOMAD and NIGEL], the wealthy young American recruited shortly before his graduation afrom Cambridge University in 1937. (Their) optimism sprang far more from Straight's family connections than from any evidence of his enthusiasm for a career as a secret agent. Straight's job hunt after his return to the United States began at the top--over tea at the White House with Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt. With some assistance from Mrs. Roosevelt, he obtained a temporary, unpaid assignment in the State Department early in 1938. . .
In 1947, Michael Straight became the publisher of The New Republic and packed the magazine with Soviet agents and/or sympathizers including Soviet agent I.F. Stone--MSNBC contributor Eric Alterman's friend and mentor.
12 posted on 07/06/2003 12:34:05 AM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
I found a letter to the editor of the NYT by Michael Straight complaining of the ugly smear the reviewer of The Haunted Wood made about his relationship with the USSR intelligence community.The reviewer quoted the book back at him.
13 posted on 07/06/2003 1:33:42 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Amazing, isn't it? Straight confessed he was a spy and ratted out Anthony Blunt to MI5 but he still wanted to put a gloss on it that working for the most tyrannical regime ever was somehow OK.

Meanwhile his magazine, for over 50 years, has trashed decent Americans such as Ford and Limbergh--who helped fight Nazis and Communists--because they were isolationists until Pearl Harbor.

14 posted on 07/06/2003 2:06:32 AM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Can anyone suggest further reading on this topic. It really is intriguing (Sp?)
15 posted on 07/06/2003 2:46:15 AM PDT by gr8eman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
I've been reading about the spy William Weisband,never indicted who gave the commies the info that we had on Venona and leading to a two yr blackout on our ability to decipher the intel..and therefore our being surprised by the NKorean invasion of SKorea.The Russians had given permission for the invasion.He spent one yr in jail for failure to testify at a grand jury.The feds didn't want our secrets revealed at trial.I believe Wen Ho Lee may have benefitted from this reluctance to reveal secrets at trial.
16 posted on 07/06/2003 2:50:48 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman
Info on Yalta or the communist infiltration of our government?
17 posted on 07/06/2003 3:01:27 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Weisband was the son of Russian immigrants. As were so many other spies (Lithuania was a popular spawning ground too). Most of these people fled Russia because they were communists and got into trouble for trying to bring down the Russian government. I can see giving new immigrants and their kids equal opportunity and all but did they have to be put in the most sensitive areas of our government?

Btw...Weisband gave the Soviets information on Venona five years before the CIA learned of the Army code breaking operation. That is how pathetic our security was and how one group could not trust another because everyone knew Soviet agents were crawling all over the place.

18 posted on 07/06/2003 3:05:10 AM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
I found a reference to the reluctance of the Army to share intel because of lack of trust in the new CIA (old OSS).How did we manage ??
19 posted on 07/06/2003 3:09:43 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman
READ TREASON-ANN COULTER SHE DETAILS JUST HOW DEEP THE COMMUNIST WERE/ARE IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FROM FDR TO NOW!
20 posted on 07/06/2003 4:17:16 AM PDT by cody32127 (If Democrats are not evil, then evil has no meaning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson