Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'Connor Dismisses Rumors That She Plans to Retire From Court
The New York Times ^ | July 6, 2003 | JOHN H. CUSHMAN Jr.

Posted on 07/06/2003 12:25:01 PM PDT by sarcasm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Through commerce, through globalization, through the spread of democratic institutions, through immigration to America, it's becoming more and more one world of many different kinds of people," he continued. "And how they're going to live together across the world will be the challenge, and whether our Constitution and how it fits into the governing documents of other nations, I think will be a challenge for the next generations."

Puke

1 posted on 07/06/2003 12:25:03 PM PDT by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Forget retirment, the court needs to forcibly eject her.
2 posted on 07/06/2003 12:30:22 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (This space for rent, call 555-9388.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
SC Justice's have no business appearing on political talk shows.

Was Sandra promoting her new book, or merely there to counterbalance Breyer (if so that's a laugh of its own) or to lend 'balance' to an otherwise leftie-weighted sham of David Brinkey's old show?

I'm hurling right along with you!
3 posted on 07/06/2003 12:33:40 PM PDT by onyx (Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
whether our Constitution and how it fits into the governing documents of other nations

DOUBLE PUKE.......
4 posted on 07/06/2003 12:34:01 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (The Gift is to See the Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Other nations need to follow our example, and not the other way around.
5 posted on 07/06/2003 12:34:23 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
O'Conner is a traitor to our Constitution and her oath to the Citizens of the USA! Impeach her!
6 posted on 07/06/2003 12:35:11 PM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Sandy's not about to retire. She want to be Chief Justice when Rhenquist retires later this summer.
7 posted on 07/06/2003 12:36:21 PM PDT by upchuck (Contribute to "Republicans for Al Sharpton for President in 2004." Dial 1-800-SLAPTHADONKEY :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
"They missed it by 'that' much".

8 posted on 07/06/2003 12:36:56 PM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm; TLBSHOW; Dog Gone
I can't believe a member of the U.S. Supreme Court would utter such a treasonous statement. This must be a mis-quote?
9 posted on 07/06/2003 12:39:29 PM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
I think this is the main reason why Rehnquist will not retire, he will not allow her to become chief justice. They are both going to stay on as long as health permits.
10 posted on 07/06/2003 12:39:32 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Damn!
11 posted on 07/06/2003 12:39:42 PM PDT by Types_with_Fist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
This makes my blood boil.

Do they even KNOW WHAT THEIR JOBS ARE "SUPPOSED" TO BE?
12 posted on 07/06/2003 12:41:32 PM PDT by LaraCroft ('Bout time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
I heard Rush talking about this. Very scary, and a very real possibility. G.W.B. might elevate Sandie as a way to generate some of the female vote.
13 posted on 07/06/2003 12:42:35 PM PDT by undergroundwarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; Howlin; PhiKapMom
But when neither Justice O'Connor nor any other justice announced a retirement when the court's term ended in June, it was widely seen as making those campaigns moot.


It didn't keep the Novaks etal from using unnamed sources to further the speculation...... lol


14 posted on 07/06/2003 12:44:45 PM PDT by deport (Don't kick a cow patty on a hot day........... just a dem enabler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
It's no suprise that those two were on TV talking about social revision.

Treason, Lake of Knowledge, Arrogance, Selfishness, Patronizing, Politically correct, Shortsided. The seven deadly sins of ruling judges.
15 posted on 07/06/2003 12:45:17 PM PDT by LaraCroft ('Bout time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
I guess having a part of a building almost drop on one's head isn't enough of a clue that something's amiss.
16 posted on 07/06/2003 12:59:46 PM PDT by skr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Their difference was over whether the court should pay attention to legal opinions of other world courts, such as the European Court of Human Rights. Justice Breyer held that the foreign court's view that gay men and lesbians had a fundamental right to privacy in their sexual behavior showed that the Supreme Court's prior decision to the contrary was unfounded in the Western tradition. Mr. Scalia said that the views of foreign jurists were irrelevant under the United States Constitution.

Boy now we are ruled by the European Courts.

These "justices" must be impeached. This is the United States of America not the Peoples Republic of the World.

17 posted on 07/06/2003 2:00:58 PM PDT by ImphClinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImphClinton
These "justices" must be impeached. This is the United States of America not the Peoples Republic of the World.


BUMP

no wonder they don't go on TV much their true nature shows but GOOD.....
18 posted on 07/06/2003 2:18:33 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (The Gift is to See the Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: sarcasm
I think this is just as well. I share everyone's opinion of O'Connor as a lousy judge and a terrible appointment to the court. But I also suspect that she would have stepped down now if Bush had been getting his judicial appointments through the senate confirmation process. But he's not. Probably nothing can be done until after the 2004 election, when the Republicans may with luck gain a better edge in the Senate. Until then, we're better off keeping this confused jerk on a little longer.
20 posted on 07/06/2003 2:23:37 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson