Skip to comments.
A Fundamental Constitutional Right To Have Sex With Children, Too?
Toogood Reports ^
| July 8
| Lowell Phillips
Posted on 07/08/2003 7:08:39 AM PDT by F_Cohen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-340 next last
To: tdadams
My prediction... it's never going to happen. And I'm willing to put my money on it. Reality check:
It already has happened with homosexual sex. It is beginning to happen now with pedophilia.
I suggest you start looking for a second job, because you have a lot of money to be paying out.
41
posted on
07/08/2003 9:47:15 AM PDT
by
Houmatt
(If it is about what goes on in the bedroom, why doesn't it stay there? And leave our kids alone!)
To: Houmatt
I stand by what I said. It's never going to happen.
Reasonable people can and do make seemingly arbitrary distinctions about life and the law all the time with nary a trace of dischordance about it.
Homosexual sodomy is now legal - as it should be. Pedophilia, bestiality, necrophilia or whatever your favorite philia is will not be made legal as a result of the Lawrence decision.
42
posted on
07/08/2003 9:54:21 AM PDT
by
tdadams
To: Houmatt
What the hell are you talking about? ...we have laws against murder, theft, suicide and drug abuse. I guess I'm talking about you, who just provided a fine example of someone who can't discern between a moral objection and incidents of actual harm (such as murder and theft).
43
posted on
07/08/2003 9:57:23 AM PDT
by
tdadams
To: Snidely Whiplash
"Such laws can be justified on more than one basis."
Maybe, but they are still based on someone foisting their morals on other. Every law we have is based on that very premise.
44
posted on
07/08/2003 9:59:24 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
To: tdadams
"It seems some people can't make the distinction between a moral objection and actual harm."
It is a moral stance to stay that harming another is wrong.
45
posted on
07/08/2003 10:03:04 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
To: af_vet_rr
Why are you surprised?
If the SC can say it is ok to have SODOMY, then why is it a stretch to say it is ok to have sex with a 12 year old?
To: Houmatt
We have these morons all the time, carping about how we "cannot legislate morality." But guess what? We already do.
Of course we do. Our entire judicial system presumes the moral virtues of truth and justice.
To: buffyt
My 22 year old son said years ago that first they get us to accept homosexual sex, then necrophilia, beastiality, and pedophilia.When you accept those things, he will be right, until then, it's ludicrious.
48
posted on
07/08/2003 10:11:25 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: RaceBannon
If the SC can say it is ok to have SODOMY, then why is it a stretch to say it is ok to have sex with a 12 year old? Consenual vs non-consensual. Minors cannot give consent. But you knew that.
49
posted on
07/08/2003 10:15:16 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: RaceBannon
If the SC can say it is ok to have SODOMY, then why is it a stretch to say it is ok to have sex with a 12 year old? Consenual vs non-consensual. Minors cannot give consent. But you knew that.
50
posted on
07/08/2003 10:15:16 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: RaceBannon
If the SC can say it is ok to have SODOMY, then why is it a stretch to say it is ok to have sex with a 12 year old? Consenual vs non-consensual. Minors cannot give consent. But you knew that.
51
posted on
07/08/2003 10:15:17 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: Protagoras
Triple posts, who knows.
52
posted on
07/08/2003 10:16:46 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: MEGoody
Thanks for trying. You're only further confirming my point.
53
posted on
07/08/2003 10:19:01 AM PDT
by
tdadams
To: F_Cohen
It's time to enlarge the Supreme Court to at least eleven. Or thirteen or fifteen if that's what it takes.
To: Houmatt
That's why we have laws against murder, theft,Both of which violate rights and are therefore legitimate laws.
suicide
ROTFLMAO, good one. Arrest those who commit suicide. Execute them! It's murder after all! LOL
and drug abuse.
Which does not violate rights and is therefore illegitimate.
55
posted on
07/08/2003 10:22:23 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: George W. Bush
It's time to enlarge the Supreme Court to at least eleven. Or thirteen or fifteen if that's what it takes.Takes to do what?
56
posted on
07/08/2003 10:23:06 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: cinFLA
Irrational off topic screed against a political party. Seek help, you have serious issues and obsessions.
57
posted on
07/08/2003 10:27:12 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: MEGoody
It is a moral stance to stay that harming another is wrong.Shhh! You're going to blow the whole concept of the great Liberaltarian social experiment.
To: Protagoras
Minors cannot give consent. But you knew that. Why? Because the legislature says so? BWAHAHAHAAAA
.
To: Houmatt
Those laws are taken directly from the Ten Commandments, which also means, of course, they violate the separation of church and state as well. Why didn't they "take" them all? Do you support laws requiring adherence to all the ten commmadments?
60
posted on
07/08/2003 10:31:13 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-340 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson