Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA: Gases Breached Shuttle Wing in 2000
Associated Press ^ | 7/8/03 | TED BRIDIS

Posted on 07/08/2003 12:20:26 PM PDT by anymouse

Superheated gases breached the left wing of shuttle Atlantis during its fiery return to earth in hauntingly similar fashion to the demise of Columbia nearly three years later, according to internal NASA documents.

Unlike Columbia, Atlantis suffered no irreparable damage during the May 2000 episode and, after repairs, returned to flight just four months later. NASA ordered fleetwide changes in how employees install protective wing panels and sealant materials.

The small leak through a seam in Atlantis' wing during its return from the International Space Station was disclosed in documents sought by The Associated Press under the Freedom of Information Act. The mission commander was James Halsell, a shuttle veteran who is coordinating NASA's effort to return the shuttles to flight.

One of the seven Atlantis astronauts, Mary Ellen Weber, said NASA never told her about the breach, which was not discovered until the shuttle had landed.

"There are thousands and thousands of things that can go wrong, and the crew is very much aware this can happen," Weber said. "Certainly, when you learn about this, if it had progressed, it could have been much more dire."

Weber operated the robotic arm aboard Atlantis and flew aboard Discovery in July 1995. She said NASA may have reported the wing damage to other crew members. Attempts by AP to reach the other astronauts by telephone through family members and NASA offices in Houston and Washington were unsuccessful; one Atlantis crewman was a Russian cosmonaut and another has left NASA to return to the Air Force.

NASA spokesman James Hartsfield said crews and engineers generally participate in two months of meetings to discuss their experiences and spacecraft conditions. He could not say whether the shuttle's commander or pilot was told about the wing breach, which NASA blamed on incorrectly installed sealant material.

Some experts expressed surprise that superheated gases ever had leaked inside a shuttle's wing. Although protective wing panels have been found damaged, even cracked, the Columbia disaster was widely believed outside NASA to have been the first such breach.

"Very little information about the flaws of the tile system ever make it into the open literature, so those of us who work on this ... seldom hear much about serious problems such as this one," said Steven P. Schneider, an associate professor at Purdue University's Aerospace Sciences Lab. "I've never heard this sort of leak occurred."

NASA said it later determined Atlantis' exterior wing panels were not damaged by the overheating despite being discolored from the high temperatures. Aluminum structures inside the wing "looked outstanding," NASA said. Other parts immediately behind the wing panels were covered with a glassy material, apparently from melted insulating tile and other sealant material.

Hartsfield said all damaged parts were replaced.

The space agency formally reported the damage to its Program Requirements Control Board, an internal safety oversight body, which ordered fleetwide improvements in the installation of sealant materials before Atlantis was allowed to launch for its mission in September 2000. Atlantis is expected to be the next shuttle into space when NASA is cleared to resume flights.

Weber, now an associate vice president at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, described Atlantis' return to Earth as mostly routine and remembered seeing an orange glow from hot gases dancing outside the shuttle windows.

Although damage inside Atlantis' left wing was detected post-flight, NASA worried about the shuttle's return even before the discovery.

During liftoff, a 6-inch chunk of ice had smashed against the back edge of the right wing; so experts deemed it prudent to adjust Atlantis' flight to rapidly cool its wings prior to the fiery trip through the atmosphere, NASA documents showed.

It was impossible to know whether this cooling technique, called a thermal conditioning maneuver, also helped minimize heat damage inside Atlantis' defective left wing. NASA later determined damage on the right wing was relatively minor.

The board investigating Columbia's Feb. 1 breakup determined that superheated gases penetrated protective wing panels that had been loosened by insulating foam that broke off its external fuel tank on liftoff and smashed against the shuttle. Investigators believe searing re-entry temperatures melted key structures inside until Columbia tumbled out of control and broke apart at close to 13,000 miles per hour, killing its seven astronauts.

NASA did not consider ordering the thermal conditioning maneuver on Columbia because it believed such a move would have interfered with efforts to warm Columbia's landing gear tires for a safe landing.

NASA blamed the Atlantis damage on improper installation of a seal between two protective panels on the shuttle's left wing, "called a butterfly gap filler," at the Boeing Co. plant in Palmdale, Calif., during an overhaul of Atlantis in late 1997. The mistake went unnoticed during subsequent inspections because the part could not be seen without removing protective panels, NASA said.

Engineers found the damage on Atlantis while investigating the mystery of a partially melted insulating tile. Removing two protective wing panels nearby and peering inside the wing structure, they determined the dislodged seal had created "a substantial flow path," according to NASA's internal reports. The gap measured just over one-quarter inch, about the width of a paperclip or a No. 2 pencil.

The protective panels, insulators and other hardware inside the left wing "shows various signs of overheating," NASA reported. Photographs showed charred and scorched components, including parts made from titanium and inconel, two of the most heat-resistant materials on the shuttle. Titanium melts about 3,000 degrees; inconel melts about 2,550 degrees.

Investigators examining Columbia's breakup remain uncertain over the size of the gap that permitted hot gases to penetrate that shuttle's wing. But they believe it was as small as a one-inch slit running vertically up the wing for nearly 30 inches. In a test Monday, a chunk of foam blew open a dramatic 16-inch hole in parts of a mock-up of a shuttle wing.

Temperatures during a shuttle's return can climb to almost 3,000 degrees — nearly one-third as hot as the surface of the sun — along parts of the spacecraft, especially the leading edges of its wings. Damage there is considerably more likely to doom a shuttle than anywhere else. NASA requires immediate repairs when damage to the wing's protective panels exceeds four-hundredths of an inch, about the thickness of a dime.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; Technical; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2000; atlantis; columbia; goliath; nasa; shuttle; space; sts107
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
Not looking good for NASA's openess WRT to safety issues.
1 posted on 07/08/2003 12:20:27 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Space
Space ping
2 posted on 07/08/2003 12:20:48 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

God Bless America!
God Bless This Man!

Keep Our Republic Free

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!



3 posted on 07/08/2003 12:21:09 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Wow -- that's a biggie. I wonder if this was disclosed during the anomaly assessment briefings. And if not, would the mission managers have decided differently if they'd known about it?
4 posted on 07/08/2003 12:22:51 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Was this before or after the new eco-friendly foam was used?
5 posted on 07/08/2003 12:24:44 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
This is the first I've heard of this. This is BAD! This means NASA safety knew about this hazard, and did nothing.
6 posted on 07/08/2003 12:25:16 PM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
If we launch another of those damned shuttles, we WILL be committing human sacrifice on the altar of Federal Lifetime Employment for Impotent Technocrats.
7 posted on 07/08/2003 12:25:30 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
ping
8 posted on 07/08/2003 12:29:06 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Free Miguel and Priscilla!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
ping
9 posted on 07/08/2003 12:32:40 PM PDT by MrConfettiMan (Brain tumor survivor since August 19, 2001. Striving, thriving and surviving each and every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phasma proeliator
Pingo Senior
10 posted on 07/08/2003 12:45:07 PM PDT by da_toolman (Don't tread on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"Certainly, when you learn about this, if it had progressed, it could have been much more dire."


ummm how much more dire do you get than dead???
11 posted on 07/08/2003 12:51:03 PM PDT by paladinkc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: anymouse; XBob
This is really sad. Time was, the astronauts were briefed on every little thing that went wrong or was unexplained.

I guess this must be the "faster, better, cheaper" paradigm...

12 posted on 07/08/2003 12:53:05 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
Ahem...
NASA blamed the Atlantis damage on improper installation of a seal between two protective panels on the shuttle's left wing, "called a butterfly gap filler," at the Boeing Co. plant in Palmdale, Calif., during an overhaul of Atlantis in late 1997. The mistake went unnoticed during subsequent inspections because the part could not be seen without removing protective panels, NASA said.

13 posted on 07/08/2003 12:56:19 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
While I'm generally pretty quick to damn NASA, and I think deservedly so, this entry of super-heated gases needs to be quantified. Was it a minor event with only a small tell-tail sign, or was it significant.

I will admit that any leak at all has the potention to become a larger leak, so I don't seek to minimize this too much. It is serious. And the fact that it was kept secret bothers me.

NASA doesn't seem to have much if any credibility left as far as I am concerned.
14 posted on 07/08/2003 1:00:37 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Remember the good old days when the crew was sitting on top of the rocket with no chance of getting slammed by any falling debris...?
15 posted on 07/08/2003 1:00:42 PM PDT by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw
I'd like to argue stridently against your arguement, but I have very little confidence in the shuttle any longer, and none in NASA management.

This has been a CYA effort since the first moments after the shuttle broke up. That first news conference sealed NASA's fate for me.

When they admitted the foam strike, dismissed it as relevant and proceded to keep a straight face, I just shook my head and thought, "Here we go again."
16 posted on 07/08/2003 1:04:33 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Isn't hindsight wonderful. The fact is that since there had been a breach without serious consequences there was a false sense that there would be NO dire consequences in the future.
17 posted on 07/08/2003 1:18:39 PM PDT by OldFriend ((BUSH/CHENEY 2004))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
I can understand if kids grow up not wanting to be astronauts.
18 posted on 07/08/2003 1:19:51 PM PDT by PatrioticAmerican (When the government controls all information, they control you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Well, well, well. Given the fact that NASA totally denied any possibility of wing damage after the crash and arrogantly refused to check for wing damage after the launch shows criminal negligence that should lead to the prosecution of top NASA officials.

Don't hold your breath.


Erik
19 posted on 07/08/2003 1:21:52 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
The fact is that since there had been a breach without serious consequences there was a false sense that there would be NO dire consequences in the future.

Would NASA have done the following if they believed that there would be NO dire consequences of such a reoccurance?

"The space agency formally reported the damage to its Program Requirements Control Board, an internal safety oversight body, which ordered fleetwide improvements in the installation of sealant materials before Atlantis was allowed to launch for its mission in September 2000."

20 posted on 07/08/2003 1:25:23 PM PDT by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson