Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. agency confirms sinking of USS Liberty was accident
Haaretz ^ | 9/7/2003 | Nathan Guttman

Posted on 07/08/2003 4:33:17 PM PDT by Courier

U.S. agency confirms sinking of USS Liberty was accident

By Nathan Guttman, Haaretz Correspondent

WASHINGTON - New documents released this week by America's National Security Agency support Israel's version of a long-festering controversy between the two countries: Israel's sinking of an American spy ship, the USS Liberty, off the coast of Gaza during the 1967 Six-Day War.

Israel has always said it had no idea the ship was American, but conspiracy theorists and anti-Israel propagandists still claim Israel sank the ship in the full knowledge that it was American.

The documents, originally defined as top secret, were made public by Florida Judge Jay Cristol, who

has been investigating the Liberty incident for years and published a book on the subject last year. On Monday, the NSA gave him a transcript of conversations held by two Israeli Air Force helicopter pilots who were hovering over the Liberty as it was sinking, and these tapes confirm Israel's claim that the sinking of the ship, which killed 34 American servicemen and wounded 171, was a tragic error.

After the Liberty was bombed by both the Israel Air Force and the Israel Navy, the two helicopter pilots were summoned from their base to assess the damage and evaluate the possibility of rescuing the surviving crew members. An American spy plane, which had been sent to the area as soon as the NSA learned of the attack, recorded their conversations, which took place between 2:30 and 3:37 P.M. on June 8, the third day of the war.

The spy plane also recorded the orders radioed to the pilots by their supervisor at Hatzor Base, which instructed them to search for Egyptian survivors from the "Egyptian warship" that had just been bombed - thus supporting Israel's claim that it had believed the ship was Egyptian when it ordered it attacked. "Pay attention. The ship is now identified as Egyptian," the pilots were told.

Nine minutes later, Hatzor informed the pilots that it was not an Egyptian warship, but an Egyptian cargo ship. Only at 3:07 were the pilots first informed that the ship might not have been Egyptian at all: Hatzor told them that if they found Arabic-speaking survivors, they should be taken to El-Arish, but if they found English-speaking survivors, they should be taken to Lod. "Clarify by the first man that you bring up, what nationality he is, and report to me immediately," the supervisor instructed, according to the transcript. "It's important to know."

Then, at 3:12, one of the pilots informed Hatzor that he saw an American flag flying over the wounded ship. He was asked to investigate and determine whether it was really an American ship.

This is not the first time such transcripts have been made public: Israel gave its own recordings of the pilots' conversations to the British television station Thames in 1987. But conspiracy theorists charged that Israel had doctored the tapes before handing them over to the station in order to hide the fact that it sank the Liberty intentionally. No such imputation can be made about these new transcripts, as they were never in Israeli hands.

Israel has always said it attacked the Liberty, which America sent to the region to gather intelligence on the progress of the war, because it believed it was an Egyptian supply ship ferrying supplies to the Egyptian troops that Israel was then fighting. When it discovered the error, it immediately informed the Americans, apologized and paid compensation to the victims' families.

The incident was investigated by inquiry commissions in both Israel and the United States, and both concluded that it had, indeed, been a tragic error. Nevertheless, the controversy never died. In 1979, one of the survivors, James Ennes, published a book accusing Israel of bombing the American ship deliberately. Ennes claimed an Israeli spy plane had hovered over the ship all morning and had surely identified it as American, since the American flag was clearly visible.

A later book, written by James Bamford, charged that Israel sank the ship in order to keep America from learning of its plans to attack Syria, and further claimed that the NSA had tapes of conversations among Israeli pilots that not only confirmed this, but also proved that the tapes released by Israel had been doctored.

Another claim that appears frequently on the dozens of Internet sites devoted to the affair is that Israel sank the ship to conceal a mass murder of Egyptian soldiers on the Sinai peninsula.

In its letter to Cristol, the NSA stressed that, contrary to the claims that often appear in such books and Web sites - that the agency has tapes from both the Liberty and from a nearby American submarine that confirm Israel's guilt - the only tapes that exist were those made by the spy plane and given to Cristol this week.

"It's the last piece of intelligence that remained classified, and every rational person that will read it will understand that there is no truth in these conspiracy theories against Israel," Cristol said Tuesday. But he added: "Those who hate Israel, who hate Jews, and those who believe in conspiracy will not be convinced by anything."

Cristol, a former U.S. navy pilot and legal officer, began investigating the Liberty incident 14 years ago. Since publishing his book, which vindicates Israel, he has received threats and been accused of being an Israeli agent. "I take this lightly, but I am saddened to learn that there is this kind of hate toward Israel," he said.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel
KEYWORDS: accident; bloodlibel; israel; nsa; sixdaywar; ussliberty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 361-378 next last
To: Dubya
Sounds like an Israeli agent. Wish all Americans were Israeli agents

http://www.thelibertyincident.com/author.htm


About the Author

In November 1951, during the Korean conflict, A. Jay Cristol joined the US Navy as an aviation cadet, earning his Navy Wings of Gold in April 1953. He deployed with VS-37, a Navy anti-submarine squadron aboard the aircraft carrier Princeton (CV-37) to the Western Pacific and the Sea of Japan. He was also part of TG70.4 during February 1955, in support of evacuating Nationalist Chinese from the Tachen Islands near the Communist China mainland in the South China Sea. He flew day and night missions as both a hunter pilot flying the Grumann AF-2W and a killer pilot flying the Grumann AF- 2S. He was subsequently attached to the Fleet All Weather Training Unit, Pacific at San Diego, California as an instrument flight instructor and taught maneuvers for the delivery of nuclear weapons. Upon returning to civilian life, Cristol joined the Naval Air Reserve where he qualified as a four-engine Navy transport plane commander. In the 1960s, he flew operational flights during the Cuban Missile Crises and volunteer airlift missions to Vietnam.

After 18 years as a Naval aviator, Cristol joined the Judge Advocate General's Corps. He graduated with distinction from Naval Justice School. He served as a lawyer for another twenty years. His duties included teaching law of war and serving as the administrative officer for the summer Naval Reserve law courses. In 1983, he was made an honorary professor by the Naval Justice School. He has performed special active duty in the office of the Secretary of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations. In the 1980s, the Department of Defense sent him to the International Institute of Humanitarian Law at San Remo, Italy to lecture on Law of Naval warfare to senior foreign military officers. Captain Cristol retired in 1988. He wears more than a dozen military decorations including the Meritorious Service Medal, the Navy Commendation Medal, and the Navy Achievement Medal.

In civilian life, Cristol became a lawyer and practiced civil law. He served as Special Assistant Attorney General of Florida during the 1959, 1961, 1963, and 1965 sessions of the Florida Legislature. In 1985, after 25 years of law practice, he left his position as senior partner in a firm he founded to accept an appointment to the federal bench. He continues to serve as Chief Judge Emeritus in the Southern District of Florida. He is also an adjunct professor, teaching at the University of Miami School of Law.

An interest in international terrorism led him to enroll in the Graduate School of International Studies of the University of Miami where he researched and wrote on terrorism. Because of his background as a navy pilot, a navy lawyer (JAG), a lecturer in law of naval warfare, a civil lawyer, and a federal judge, members of the faculty encouraged him to research and write about the Liberty incident. He spent ten years researching the subject and was awarded a Ph.D. by the University of Miami Graduate School of International Studies. His collection of research material on this subject is considered to be the largest and most complete of any collection on the subject in the entire world. After completing his dissertation, he obtained declassification of additional heretofore secret documents through many Freedom of Information Act requests and appeals. His book, The Liberty Incident, was written to update and complete the historical record. He has written numerous articles on law, aviation, history, and other subjects.

Judge Cristol remains an avid aviator. He made his first flight in a Piper J-3 Cub on Biscayne Bay in 1945. He has personally piloted a Ford Tri-Motor, the Goodyear Blimp, a Soviet MiG-15, and many other unique, antique, or historic aircraft. In 1998, he became one of the few persons to have an airplane named after him when Pan Am named one of their 727 aircraft the Clipper A. Jay Cristol. He is a founding member of the National Museum of Naval Aviation at the Naval Air Station in Pensacola, Florida and a founding member of the Wings Over Miami Military and Classic Aircraft Museum in Miami, Florida.
101 posted on 07/08/2003 6:01:18 PM PDT by Courier (Quick: Name one good thing about the Saudis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
WHICH of the american sailors do you believe

I believe all of them.

Which ones don't you believe?

GOD BLESS THE USA.

102 posted on 07/08/2003 6:01:48 PM PDT by Dubya (Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: clockwork
Good points....and when did the Egyptian "navy" ever pose a threat to Isreal?

The modern era of naval warfare is generally accepted as having begun shortly on October 21, 1967, when the Israeli destroyer Elath was sunk by antiship missiles fired from Egyptian patrol boats 13 miles away. The Elath was the first ship ever sunk by antiship missiles.

BTW, those same missiles were quite usable against Israeli shore targets.

We told Israel that we had no naval vessels operating off of their country. The Israelis' only mistake was believing the US government.

103 posted on 07/08/2003 6:02:02 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Courier
IMO Judge Cristol is wrong.
104 posted on 07/08/2003 6:03:00 PM PDT by Dubya (Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Courier
The Liberty Incident By A. Jay Cristol, Univ. of Miami, 1997.
105 posted on 07/08/2003 6:04:54 PM PDT by Dubya (Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Dubya
I believe all of them.

Which do you believe when their statements flatly one another?

106 posted on 07/08/2003 6:06:54 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
Why would the NSA release this at such a late date if they were just making it all up? Are you saying the intercept was doctored by the NSA? For what purpose?

All we have is this paper as proof that they did. You have any independent sources?

Doctored, well of course the NSA would never do that, the government would never lie. Someone in the CIA or White House recently lied to President Bush about Iraq attempting to buy nuclear fuel from Niger but its INCONCEIVABLE that the trusty Nixon administration would lie to support an ally once the damage was done.

107 posted on 07/08/2003 6:07:22 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Dubya
Wrong about what?

Get it through your head. All Cristol is doing is digging into the issue.

The NSA is proving Israel did not with knowledge deliberately attack an American ship.

Think Cristol is making this up? That no such NSA transcript exists?

Will find out soon enough.
108 posted on 07/08/2003 6:07:33 PM PDT by Courier (Quick: Name one good thing about the Saudis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
All of them, of course. Doublethink is the practice of simultaneously holding two contradictory opinions.
109 posted on 07/08/2003 6:07:55 PM PDT by TheAngryClam (NO MULLIGANS- BILL SIMON, KEEP OUT OF THE RECALL ELECTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Dubya
You do realize that the Washington Report on Middle Eastern Affairs generally follows a Wahabbist Waco line--because they're funded by Wahabbist Wackos?
110 posted on 07/08/2003 6:08:38 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
But no anti-Semite will ever be convinced. They will just say that the US gov't is controlled by "The JOOZ" and that this is an ongoing part of some conspiracy

I'm very pro-Israel, but I still don't think this report is accurate. Every nation makes mistakes, every nation has a part of their history that is unsettling. The attack on the Liberty is part of Israel's. That doesn't make me an anti-Semite.

111 posted on 07/08/2003 6:09:26 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dubya; adam_az
I remember a story I used to hear that I think applies to the sailors' situation.

Four "less than stellar" students were enrolled in a mathematics class, and carpooled to school together, which lead to them skipping class together. One day, they inadvertantly skipped an important exam. They begged their professor to allow them to make up the exam, arguing that they missed class because their car had a flat tire that morning. Even though they had missed a lot of class, he agreed. The students were pretty proud that the professor bought their lies. When they came to take the test, the professor put each of them into different corners, and passed out the test. There was only one question on the page: "(100% of your grade) Which tire was it that was flat?"
112 posted on 07/08/2003 6:11:54 PM PDT by TheAngryClam (NO MULLIGANS- BILL SIMON, KEEP OUT OF THE RECALL ELECTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

Comment #113 Removed by Moderator

To: Teacher317
That's the point.

This was a mistake. It may have even been in a sense criminally negligent (although heat of war should be a mitigating circumstance) but it was not deliberate.

And that's all that really matters.

Condolences to the victims of the Liberty and all incidents of friendly fire.
114 posted on 07/08/2003 6:13:38 PM PDT by Courier (Quick: Name one good thing about the Saudis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Courier
there is no way on God's Earth, these men know what was in the Israelis' mind.

No but the Americans know what flag they were flying? Do the Israelis always attack and then check the wreckage to see what they attacked?

115 posted on 07/08/2003 6:14:14 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: TheAngryClam
Not that I'm calling the sailors liars (I just realized it sounds like that).

Simply that you can tell that there's a serious problem when the stories don't match.
116 posted on 07/08/2003 6:14:31 PM PDT by TheAngryClam (NO MULLIGANS- BILL SIMON, KEEP OUT OF THE RECALL ELECTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: TheAngryClam
Whats your point?
117 posted on 07/08/2003 6:14:58 PM PDT by Dubya (Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
I know all about Occam's Razor - I also have read a number of accounts of the Liberty episode.

The balance of the evidence would indicate that Israel knew exactly what they were doing - That is what Occam's Razor tells us. Do you think the Israelis incapable of deception operations? Deception ops have been a hallmark of the Israelis since the beginning.

Your homework, my condescending friend, is to read the accounts of the sailors onboard, before you jump in blazing insults out your fourth point of contact.
118 posted on 07/08/2003 6:15:01 PM PDT by LouD (Line, Tag, Multipurpose - One (1) each)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Courier
All Cristol is doing is digging into the issue.


I commend him for his persistence. Can we get him to check out the 1947 Roswell incident next or if FDR knew we were going to be attacked at Pearl Harbor?

I am going to withdraw from where I may have too energetically jumped in and go back to other issues and a cold beer.

It was a tragedy , any way you cut it.

119 posted on 07/08/2003 6:15:26 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Support FRee Republic ..... IN ZOT WE TRUST! ..... http://www.DRAFTTOM.com ..... Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
When it is very possible that your country might not exist a few hours later, shoot first and ask questions later is a very, very understandable policy.
120 posted on 07/08/2003 6:15:38 PM PDT by TheAngryClam (NO MULLIGANS- BILL SIMON, KEEP OUT OF THE RECALL ELECTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 361-378 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson