Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justshutupandtakeit
O'Connor and Kennedy are generally considered Moderates not Liberals. Republicans have always been different than Democrats and your attempt to paint them with such a broad brush indicates you don't really know much about American political history.

I have a degree in history pal, and I am constantly reading more history. I am also acquainted with the intent of our founders on the U.S. Constitution and the meaning of that document. The Constitution is the LAW OF THE LAND, and I'm sick and tired of the SCOTUS (somtimes with Bush's approval) inventing new rights out of thin air (right to Sodomy and racial preference and privacy and on and on). Moderates? You call inventing a Constitutional right to sodomy moderate? I don't and neither does anyone else who gives a flip about the Constitution. In this country, laws rule, not men. Tell that to your buddy Bush.

While I have concerns about illegal immigration and some criticism of the GOP about it there is zero chance of the RATS doing anything about. Bush has been a marvelous president and had Gore won we would be in truly deep shiite as deadly enemies could attack us without regard for consequence as under the Abomination he served with for eight years.

Bush is no better than the Dems on immigration. In fact, he's worse. He panders to the mexicans. The Republicans do nothing because corporations need the cheap labor, democrats do nothing because they want the votes of the immigrants. Everyone knows that.

But it also must be remembered that these illegals are here with the connivance and assistment of millions of Americans and that until the latter half of last century there was no concern about illegal immigration. Mexicans wandered across the border at will and no one cared.

That's because almost all immigrants before then WERE LEGAL. We didn't have an invasion of illegals then as we do now. Now, MOST AMERICANS want it stopped and want it stopped now! Listen to the people Bush. So much for homeland defense!! This illegal invasion makes it a joke.

Bush HAS fought against abortion and HAS tried to do the right thing in many instances but is blocked by the RATmedia alliance and the lack of loyalty of short-sighted and impatient people who should support him but expect miracles.

I haven't seen him do anything but give lip service so far. I don't see him fighting the dems over the holdup of teh judicial nominees. Repubs are COWARDLY SISSIES in this regard. I want people in there who WILL FIGHT.

Bush is the most conservative ELECTABLE president. He is not a dictator and must work with that same population you just stated was immoral. Changing them is the only way to get the results you seem to want. How can you complain about Bush not being conservative enough when he was put into the White House strictly through the skin of his teeth and only because the Supreme Court applied the constitution?

Sounds like hero worship to me. I will speak with my vote and my vote will not go for Bush unless he changes, and neither will alot of other people like me.

How could he swerve hard to the right knowing that would defeat him and allow the RATS to return to destroying everything honorable about America? You think he is an idiot? Get real, the views of Freepers are the fringe of the fringe in America and our views will never be the views of any but a small minority of Americans, the rest just WON'T think about these issues. They don't care or are actively anti-American.

If America is destroyed by liberals, it will be the fault of the American people, not me. I am voting for truth and moral principle. NO COMPROMISE.

Look at Bush's enemies and tell me you will join them in opposing him. They know very well he is deadly to the RATliberal program and are willing to use every deception, misinformation and lie to defeat him. You apparently have no problem in joining that despicable crew.

I oppose Bush for different reasons. The democrats are evil and have their own diabolical agenda. I stand on the U.S. Constitution. I see you have no argument against the fact that our entire govt ignores the Constitution - the law of the land.

53 posted on 07/11/2003 9:59:12 AM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: exmarine
If you have a degree in history apparently you learned nothing obtaining it. Particularly about politics.

Apparently you did not learn that the SC decides which laws are laws and which are just words on paper. Or that IT WAS ALWAYS THAT WAY.

O'Connor has always been considered a "moderate" don't blame me for it.

What "everybody knows" is not known to me and is generally wrong anyway.

Why is it that Bush, who should have plenty of knowledge of all the problems with illegals since Texas is one of the states most affected, not in the same panic as the experts here? Could it be that, for the most part, it is not a killing issue or one that is easily solved? For all the raving about it there is not ONE practical, implementable idea ever presented on how to solve it.

While amassing historical knowledge you seemed to have missed the FACT that the Executive does not control the Senate and apparently are unaware that the RATS are not helping themselves with these stunts. Let them keep it up only those who want everything to have happened yesterday are upset. Most of the politically aware understand that this is a huge briar patch the RATS are getting themselves into.

After the next election the clueless will be whining again about how the RATS didn't get their message out and that is why they were smashed again.

There are many Republicans who will fight. What crew of absurd non-entities would you support? Harry Browne? Or some one who crawled out from some other rock? Who is going to vote for these people since the most conservative presidential candidate in the last 25 yrs could not even get a majority of popular votes? Last time I checked one had to get more than 2% of the votes to be president.

You will have to face facts at some point and Bush is FAR and AWAY the most conservative president who could possibly get elected. There is no other except in the wet dreams of the hysterically deluded. This is RAT strategy, try and alienate "real" conservatives and turn them against Bush. It won't work but don't let that stop you trying. There are only two sides here Pro or Anti America and you are apparently willing to side with Michael Moore, Dan RAther, CNN, the Dixie Chicks, Jeanine Garofolo, and Tom Daschle. But don't insult us by claiming to be a conservative.

And No there won't be a lot like you. You will merely be part of that 1% who represent no one but the permanently dissaffected. I don't worship heroes though I will praise them.

It is merely hyperbolic hysteria to claim the "entire government ignores the constitution." There is nothing to argue about such a statement which is just silliness.

It matters not what excuse you use for joining the Anti-American side, it only matters that you are.
60 posted on 07/11/2003 12:27:36 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson