To: tomball
Before anybody asserts "There were no WMDs, Bush lied", consider this:
1. When the UNSCOM inspectors were withdrawn from Iraq in November, 1998 (a whole 'nother story), they had confirmed the existence of "tons of chemical weapons" and "hundreds of liters of biological weapons". They were there, then. Where are they now?
2. What do you call nuclear centrifuges buried in rose gardens? Or mobile laboratories with no apparent purpose other than propagation of biological weapons? Or barrels of ricin? Or, for that matter, tanker trucks full of fumed silicon dioxide...???
Go ahead. Make my day.
7 posted on
07/10/2003 7:35:29 PM PDT by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
To: okie01
okay, I heard something ( I don't remember where so no flames please ) about Iraqi ships cruising the Arabian (?) sea in radio silence. I swear it was on one of the news channels with a scrolling headline bar... Is there by chance anyone else who saw this? Why haven;t we gone after them??
15 posted on
07/10/2003 7:42:47 PM PDT by
PurVirgo
To: okie01
Can someone explain to me why if there are no WMD's why did the UN continue with the food for oil program taking millions of dollars from the Iraqi people, and not lift all the sanctions. Why are they (UN) not under the magnify glass?
39 posted on
07/11/2003 12:25:25 AM PDT by
boxerblues
(God bless the 101st and keep them safe)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson