Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cross-border SARS scare
The London Free Press (Canada) ^ | 2003-07-12 | RANDY RICHMOND, AND MARISSA NELSON

Posted on 07/12/2003 8:19:26 AM PDT by freeforall

Cross-border SARS scare

But there's little danger that Texans quarantined after London's air show have the disease, health officials say. RANDY RICHMOND, AND MARISSA NELSON, Free Press Reporters 2003-07-12 03:46:06

A SARS scare boomer-anged from Texas to Ontario yesterday after a group of U.S airmen were isolated on their return from working at London's air show. Officials scrambled to contain the damage to Ontario's image -- already reeling from 39 SARS deaths this year and a plunge in tourism.

"It taints the whole province," said John Winston, Tourism London general manager. "It is the perception that is the most difficult thing to clear. It just sort of reinforces the notion we have it."

There's little danger the 11 people quarantined in Texas and three others under watch there -- a mixture of airmen and family members living near Dyess Air Force Base in Abilene, Tex. -- have potentially fatal severe acute respiratory syndrome, said health officials in Canada and the U.S.

Health professionals with the 7th Medical Group at the base said initial test results from eight people believed exposed to SARS have come back negative. Two of the eight tested positive for streptococcus pneumonia.

"Although the early samples are negative for SARS coronavirus, more testing is being conducted to rule out infection. Definitive results may not be in for another two to three weeks," a release said.

Chances the Texans have SARS are "virtually nil," said Dr. James Young, Ontario's commissioner of public security. "I'm concerned about the report being put out there. The report causes anxiety in that (Texas) community . . . and causes economic damage here."

The story broke on CNN early yesterday and quickly hit news Web sites and networks in Canada and the U.S.

London city hall called a late-day news conference to dispel fears.

"We very much want to remove any anxiety or concern," said acting mayor Russ Monteith. "I would have preferred London did not get mentioned on CNN."

It's highly unlikely the Texas airmen could have got SARS from a one-hour layover in Toronto, said Dr. Graham Pollett, medical officer of health for the Middlesex-London Health Unit.

The airmen travelled through Toronto on their way to and from the London air show, held June 27-29.

There have been no SARS cases in Toronto since June 12, Pollett said.

"Preliminary testing (in Texas) has been negative. We are advised they are improving. The fact none of them are in hospital is an excellent sign and speaks to the unlikelihood this is SARS."

Toronto's 18 SARS patients in hospitals have been ill for a month or longer and experts believe none is still contagious.

The last time anyone caught SARS in Toronto outside a hospital or home of a health-care worker was April 8.

U.S. military officials remained tightlipped about the SARS cases yesterday, confirming London was the location of the air show only when pressed.

The air force would not name the people under quarantine, citing privacy. Nor would they name the jet they worked on, or when their flights arrived and departed.

An air show official confirmed the crew was with a B-1B Lancer bomber from Dyess, displayed at the show.

About a half-dozen ground crew from Dyess took a commercial flight to Toronto June 25, according to air show personnel and Abilene officials.

After an hour-long stopover at Pearson, they took another commercial flight to London. The bomber arrived the next day, flown by an air crew from Dyess.

"They spent several days in the London area," said Capt. David May, chief of public affairs for Dyess.

The men stayed in London hotels.

On June 30 or July 1, the ground crew flew back to Toronto, again waited for about an hour, then caught a flight back to Texas.

"They did not leave the airport. It was straight there and straight back," May said.

The World Health Organization dropped Toronto from its SARS-affected list July 2, after the city went 20 days, or two full incubation periods, without a new SARS case.

Days ago, one of the ground crew who'd been to London reported to the Dyess medical clinic complaining of "mild to moderate respiratory symptoms," the Abilene health department said. "Those symptoms include a fever, respiratory symptoms such as coughing or difficulty breathing. . . ."

When medical staff learned the man had been through Toronto, they isolated him under U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention rules.

Two other airmen who went through Toronto then showed symptoms, as did six others in contact with the airmen.

Late yesterday, two more people in Abilene connected to the base complained of symptoms and were quarantined, raising the total to 11, and three others were put under watch. "They all had contact with the airmen," said Lt. Saje Park at Dyess.

None of the 14 is being treated in hospital.

Initial test results for eight of those in quarantine were negative for SARS, Abilene's health department reported, although more testing is being done to rule it out.

Two were positive for common bacteria often seen in patients with pneumonia.

Officials contradicted each other on several key points yesterday:

- Pollett said he was told two crew members from Dyess who went to the air show complained of symptoms only after arriving home June 30.

- But Abilene officials said there were three crew members who complained of symptoms after travelling through Toronto July 1.

- The doctor in charge of their treatment contradicted reports the air crew felt sick only after arriving home. One mechanic reported to U.S. authorities he felt sick in London, said Dr. John Gullett at Hendrick Health System, a hospital for base personnel and civilians.

That doesn't change the risk to Londoners, Pollett said.

"The U.S. Air Force personnel who were in London for the air show do not pose any threat to those who attended."

Even if one airman had got SARS in Toronto, the illness wouldn't have had enough time to incubate by the time he reached London, he said.

U.S. media outlets reported yesterday three of the nine first put in quarantine were family members.

Air show organizer Barry McGonigle did not return calls yesterday, but Wilson Boynton, director of aircraft support for the show, said he doubted anyone got SARS in Toronto. "I think it's an overreaction."

Only a handful of airport employees were working the weekend of the air show, said Mike Seabrook, vice-president of London International Airport. "We're taking direction from the health authorities and they haven't said there's any reason for alarm."

LATEST FIGURES

The latest figures on Toronto's SARS outbreak, released yesterday by Ontario's Health Ministry. Figures are compared with those issued Thursday:

- Active probable cases: 18, unchanged

- Active suspect cases: zero, unchanged

- Patients in critical condition: eight, unchanged

- Deaths: 39, unchanged

- Cumulative probable cases: 246, unchanged

- Cumulative suspect cases: 129, unchanged

Timeline

1. June 25

Ground crew of B-1B Lancer long-range bomber arrives from Dyess Air Force Base in Abilene, Tex., on a commercial flight to Toronto, then heads to the London Airshow and Balloon Festival.

2. June 26

B-1B bomber flies in carrying crew of four.

3. June 27 to 30

Bomber remains on ground in static display at air show. Air and ground crews stay in London hotel. One feels ill. Bomber likely flies out June 30.

4. July 1

Ground crew flies out, back through Toronto. One-hour stopover at Pearson International Airport. The next day, Toronto is taken off the World Health Organization's travel advisory list.

5. July 8

Sometime this week, a member of the ground crew complains of respiratory problems. Medical staff learn he was in Toronto. They also learn another ground crew member felt ill in London. Eleven people in Texas are quarantined.

Copyright © The London Free Press 2001,2002,2003


TOPICS: Canada; Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: americansars; canada; ontario; sars; toronto

1 posted on 07/12/2003 8:19:26 AM PDT by freeforall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne; CathyRyan; blam
Pinging the SARS gong again.
2 posted on 07/12/2003 6:52:22 PM PDT by Domestic Church (AMDG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Is Someone Else Carrying Your Water?

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


3 posted on 07/12/2003 6:52:32 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Domestic Church
Thank you for the ping, DC. It will be a while before these folks can be definitively cleared; this points out the difficulty--if SARS should emerge in an unlikely place, how seriously will folks take the quarantine? Not too seriously, is my guess. We'll have to wait and see what happens...
4 posted on 07/12/2003 7:47:44 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Lead me not into tempation....I can find it by myself....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freeforall
Let's keep a close eye on this potential outbreak. Sounds like nothing to worry about at this time, I don't know how reassuring that will be to the Londoners though.
5 posted on 07/13/2003 9:32:11 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
A report this morning; it was not SARS!
6 posted on 07/13/2003 11:03:57 AM PDT by freeforall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freeforall
"A report this morning; it was not SARS!"

Good deal, thanks. (But, is it too soon to be able to determine that conclusively?)

7 posted on 07/13/2003 12:44:07 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam
is it too soon to be able to determine that conclusively?

The patients tested positive for a pneumonia bacterium.

8 posted on 07/13/2003 2:07:00 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Everyone knows you can't have a successful conspiracy without a Rockefeller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson