Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Both sides mull a future without Davis
Bakersfield Californian ^ | 7/12/03 | Robert Price

Posted on 07/12/2003 9:26:32 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: SierraWasp
Hey SierraWasp

Do you note that the folks that say just leave Davis in there to let the Dems get the blame don’t LIVE in California....(gee no skin off there nose)

In seem like the national Republicans and party wrote off California a while back.

And now just wants us yahoo out here to sit back and not rock the “national” boat (that why it seems we get sold out on immigration and other issues lately)

It’s also seem to me why we have such a terrible state Republican party ....the national Republican party has put a lot of folks in power in California to do just that ....“don’t rock the boat”

note: the state party did NOT back the recall ..

also note: if the national Republican party had really BACKED Simons instead of pouting because us California locals didn’t accept the national party anointing of RINO Rordin we would not be here

Well folks in my opinion as a native Californian, this is pure, fed up, grassroots California rebellion time and if you don’t live here ...well thank you very much but......well take it from here

21 posted on 07/12/2003 10:47:14 AM PDT by tophat9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: everyone
How about the last thing that Dem said:

"A vote for Dean is a vote for the right wing, but then again that like that stuff around here".
22 posted on 07/12/2003 10:48:46 AM PDT by Paul8148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
This article repeats a lie that Professor Susan Estrich of California croaked on Fox News a few days ago. If Davis resigns, it does NOT mean the recall is derailed. California law clearly provides that if the target of a recall resigns "after the recall petition has been filed," that person is replaced only "until the election is held." And this recall petition has not only been filed, it has been completed.

Since Davis intends to donate his ego to Harvard Medical School, he will never resign. However, if he did, Lt.-Gov. Bustamante will take over only until the recall election is held. In that instance, the only question decided in that election will be who replaces Davis for the balance of his current term.

The writer of this story is either incompetent or dishonest, not to know that California law provides for this possibility in plain English. Incompetent or dishonest -- sort of defines more than half of the American press, doesn't it?

Congressman Billybob

Latest article, now up FR, "Fear and Loathing in the Supreme Court."

23 posted on 07/12/2003 11:10:37 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob ("Saddam has left the building. Heck, the building has left the building.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Thanks for this most pertinent info.
24 posted on 07/12/2003 11:12:45 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
You appear to be forgetting that the hallmark of the American left is that they cannot win in even a reasonably fair democratic process. This is, of course, why their only long-term agenda successes have come from the judiciary, i.e. from arbitrary decisions by one or a handful of their toadies. So what if the lefties use the recall process -- California's is more poorly designed than most, in that it does not provide for a majority or specific high plurality for the successor candidate -- but that doesn't invalidate the notion of recall itself. If they think they could get 50%+1 to kick out (insert your favourite politico here), let 'em try. They can't, of course.

More recalls, not fewer, are required, and nationwide. The filth (of either party, thank you) who lie their way into office have little or no fear of the wrath of the electorate, and it's high time they acquired some...or a lot.

25 posted on 07/12/2003 11:14:20 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Thanks!

The sad thing is the media continues to say the opposite re: filing vs certification and misleads and lies to the public.

But, We should expect nothing less than that from a sad sackful of losers amd moral reprobates now, should we?

26 posted on 07/12/2003 11:15:30 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Support FRee Republic ..... http://www.DRAFTTOM.com ..... Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; *calgov2002; PeoplesRep_of_LA; Canticle_of_Deborah; snopercod; Grampa Dave; ...
calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



27 posted on 07/12/2003 11:27:06 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Fricking BS!!

The man ran up a $38 BILLION deficit!

Stay out of our business, lot of people are hurting out here because of these Socialists!

28 posted on 07/12/2003 11:29:16 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Nicely said!
29 posted on 07/12/2003 11:35:45 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
Change may be painful, but not as painful as the status quo.

Absolutely right!

30 posted on 07/12/2003 11:38:45 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Thank you very much.
31 posted on 07/12/2003 11:53:27 AM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Give to Free Republic before we fall into the ocean!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: elbucko; SierraWasp
I believe it's going to shake the whole nation. This is NOT a small thing happening out here.
32 posted on 07/12/2003 11:55:15 AM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Give to Free Republic before we fall into the ocean!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"If people realized how much this recall is going to cost California taxpayers, they'd scream," Moore said. "It doesn't make sense."

Dear Mr Moore,

Your state is bleeding at the rate of $1 billion (with a B) a month with Davis in there. The recall, by your party's own admission, is $30 million TOTAL!!

Doesn't it make sense to spend a little to save a lot?

Hopefully the recall will but a clamp on the bills coming out of the Dems in Sacramento. Today Davis, Tomorrow Perata, Lockyer, Kuehl, etc.

33 posted on 07/12/2003 12:23:01 PM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
If it succeeds, the Lefties will use this tactic when it is not warranted.

Well, that's how California's constitution was set up.

If they can get the signatures, they have the right. It'll make them look petty.

There is no downside to this recall effort.

34 posted on 07/12/2003 12:25:42 PM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
And it would insert a guy who would be far more palatable -- particularly among valley Latinos -- than the man he'd be replacing, let alone some of the likely recall-ballot options.

Well, since the author is looking at the recall election from a racist point of view, I'll go on record as saying that I want Davis' replacement to be someone who is more palatable to the white residents of California.

35 posted on 07/12/2003 12:30:48 PM PDT by judgeandjury (The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
If it succeeds, the Lefties will use this tactic when it is not warranted.

Most voters will use common sense when contemplating whether or not to recall a governor.

36 posted on 07/12/2003 12:34:10 PM PDT by judgeandjury (The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
"...cut spending and reduce services mightily ..


I am a California Voter. I would support any candidate that would cut spending and reduce services mightily...

37 posted on 07/12/2003 12:37:43 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN
Unfortunately, you are heavily outnumbered by the welfare statists. Anyone rolling back social services will be doomed.
Might as well let it be a democrat, because whoever does it, the opposition party will be in power immediately thereafter.
38 posted on 07/12/2003 12:42:34 PM PDT by gcruse (There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: judgeandjury
It's gone way beyond race in this State. It's the commie agenda that's crept-in. Hell, the so-called minorities are scrapping amongst themselves, because they can't trust one another to provide "equality" for "all" of the races. And, and many of the whites have been so pacified, that they don't even know that they're gettin' screwed! The communists have done their jobs well in California. The level of education in this State is abominable. It's like herding sheep!
39 posted on 07/12/2003 12:53:37 PM PDT by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Other than public employees - especially union members - I'm not sure how many people gain from the nanny state as we have it.

I'm frankly embarassed at the quality of government services in this state. Every other state I've been to (Florida, Texas, Arizona, Nevada, etc) has appeared to have a more together government with better services, and yet taxes and property values in all those states are much lower.

If the new governor simply points out that he's cutting back on services that were too lousy to use anyway, he might get a lot more points than you are thinking.

Remember, Gray Davis, unbelievable as this may seem now, ran as a fiscal conservative!

D
40 posted on 07/12/2003 1:02:48 PM PDT by daviddennis (Visit amazing.com for protest accounts, video & more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson