Posted on 07/16/2003 5:00:27 PM PDT by demlosers
.
How about - Lock him into a cell for the rest of his life with a large screen TV on the wall playing the collected speeches of Bill & Hillary, running in an endless loop?
. . .there seems to be no end to the perverted insanity that is out there; some of it attempting to cloak itself in 'good fun' ie the 'paintgunning' down of naked women. . .
Just hope we do not here about THIS sicko; advertising on the web for companionship. . .
He deserves the worst punishment possible. . .
(. . .and I cannot fathom how he carried this out . . .and of for years without discovery.)
Is having a Slave (girl) for sex nowdyas is allowed? (Ask The Imam)
Islam ensured that the slave girl's duties were not restricted merely to domestic chores but also gave her master permission to copulate with her. This concession created an atmosphere of love and harmony between the slave girl and her master. Islam thereby raised the status of the war captive-maidens close to that of wives. It was a psychological cure to her grief-stricken heart, being deprived of her family and thrown into the hands of a strange society.The First World War in 1914 was a clear reflection of the evils involved in setting captive women free to roars about in a strange society with strange surroundings. During that war, German and English women prisoners on either side were set free to roam the streets with no-one to feed them. The result was obvious that they resorted to other unrefined and uncivilised methods of income on the streets. Thus, it is evident that the Islamic treatment of women prisoners of war was conducive towards better social relations and led to the refinement of their overall social lives.
One question that still remains is whether slavery still legally prevails anywhere in the Islamic world and whether it can be successfully implemented in this age. Well, there is no prevalence of lawful slavery in the Islamic world today and it would be difficult to implement it because of the stringent conditions attached to it. Firstly, the prisoners have to be captured in 'Jihaad' in the true sense of the word. Then again, If true 'Jihaad' did break out somewhere, there are still a number of other laws and conditions to abide by which are far too stringent for any Islamic country in the world to abide by in this time and age when people's personal gains and whims and desire are being given preference to over Islamic Law. According to Islamic Law, captive female prisoners are also part and parcel of the booty. One fifth of the booty has to be first distributed to the needy, orphans, etc. The remaining four-fifths should then be distributed among the soldiers who participated in the war. The distribution can only take effect after the booty is brought into Islamic territory. The Ameerul-Mu'mineen (Head of the Islamic State) remains the guardian of the female prisoners until he allocates them to the soldiers. Only after a soldier has been allotted a slave girl, and made the owner of her, will she become his lawful possession. After she spends a period called 'Istibraa', which is the elapse of one menstrual period, It becomes permissible for her owner to have relations with her. After possession of the slave too there are a number of other laws that affect the master and slave. There is hardly any Islamic country today that can abide to all these conditions, with the result that it is quite difficult to implement slavery in this time and age.
You can get that for killing a cat these days.
The story, or possibly others I've seen on this topic, says that the kidnappings dated back to 88, but that the longest a victim was kept was 3 years or so.
That means that a number of his victims were released or escaped and presumably did nothing to bring him to justice.
The press has been dancing around this issue, but there is something really weird about at least some of these women.
That's an awfully harsh and intolerant judgment to render just because you apparently don't agree with or share the fellow's sexual orientation!
That's more than a little unfair to the rape victims. Each one of them went to the police after they were released, but none of them could tell the police where they were being held. The sick MF would drive them far from his (I think long island) home and release them in the middle of nowhere. Four times this happened and the vicitms could give no information about where they had been because they were kept underground the entire time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.