1 posted on
07/20/2003 10:04:10 PM PDT by
Recourse
To: scripter
There's a gay teen boy that's a Scout?? Why???
To: Recourse
identify them (troops, individuals) kick them out.
End of story.
4 posted on
07/20/2003 10:16:45 PM PDT by
Militiaman7
(Congress steals my pension because I'm a Retired Disabled Vet. http://www.SupporttheVets.com)
To: Recourse; I_Love_My_Husband; *Homosexual Agenda; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; ..
Thanks for the post. Thanks for the ping.
6 posted on
07/20/2003 10:45:07 PM PDT by
scripter
(Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle.)
To: Recourse
Out in the woods, it's the Scouts who prepare the freeze-dried food while the parents wait with tin plates. Yeah, and Edison was a member of the Electrician's Local.
To: Recourse
INTSUM - read later
To: Recourse; GatorGirl; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Askel5; ...
Ping.
12 posted on
07/20/2003 10:56:22 PM PDT by
narses
("The do-it-yourself Mass is ended. Go in peace" Francis Carindal Arinze of Nigeria)
To: Recourse
Question: If the gays think the boy scouts is so important, why don't they start their own troops?
Answer: Because their goal is to force acceptance of their lifestyle in every avenue of our lives.
While I don't have too much of a problem with a scout discovering that he is gay and remaining in scouts, I have a major problem with gay scout leaders who could use their position to influence confused adolescents.
Further, I would never allow an adolescent daughter to sleep in the same tent with any adult male for obvious reasons. I see no difference in allowing an adult gay man to sleep in the same tent with the same gender he is sexually attracted to.
To: Recourse
Is Rhode Island becoming the San Fransico of New england? (looking at the source)
Why isn't the Boy Scounting central office dealing with these stealth disruptors?
(s) Why not start a "diversity scouts" where heterosexual parents can pair their young sons with a homosexual sponsor? This will allow the children of parents who are so adamant about homosexual "acceptance" to have camping sleepovers.(/s)
To: Recourse
Who, in actuality, are the haters?
Once, I helped in a door-to-door petition drive (Traverse City, MI) to keep homosexuals from being included as a group deserving special protection, from being written into the city charter. Notice, it was not about denying rights to homosexuals, merely not granting them more rights than others.
There were at least two or three persons, whom after opening their door and hearing about the petition, reacted with such venom that I was concerned for their health. They actually exuded hatred and were more than willing to share that with me. They did not try to reason. They had been expecting us, having already, with their great open minds, discussed this issue with their "church" or other "concerned" group.
These ideologically blinded nincompoops, have the gall to call others haters.
To: Recourse
if a teen is "gay" it means he is sexually active with many men. If you are straight, you are not promiscuous.
Notice no one mentions this in the story?
16 posted on
07/21/2003 4:48:51 AM PDT by
LadyDoc
To: Recourse
Perhaps we should all join an organization and destroy it from within. United Way, NOW, PETA, NAACP, NARAL. Anybody else want to help?
To: Recourse
They look on proudly as Cicilline says that "this troop's incredibly important stand to ensure that Scouting is available for all young men ... regardless of their sexual orientation" is "one small example of standing up to what's right and fair." As far as I know, Scouting is open to all boys. It's the leadership that can't be gay.
Can anybody explain to me why gays are trying to change the Boy Scouts instead of forming the Rump Rangers where they can do the same things and be openly gay?
Because it has nothing to do with helping boys. It's all about advancing the gay agenda.
Shalom.
20 posted on
07/21/2003 6:50:49 AM PDT by
ArGee
(Hey, how did I get in this handcart? And why is it so hot?)
To: Recourse
It's just amazing how well the lefties have sold this nightmare to everyday people. Any honest thinker knows who the *real* bigots are - the people who wish to subvert a fine organization to their own political ends.
I don't much care what people do on their own time - but to impugn the Boy Scouts as a "hate group" is just beyond the pale. Orwell would be impressed, I'm sure.
To: Recourse
What is remarkable about this event is that under the Boy Scout's national policy that bans gay Scouts and leaders, Cicilline, who leads a city of 173,000 people, could not lead a Boy Scout troop."A gay Mayor may "lead" a city; Richard Simmons may still "lead" an exorcise class; and Calvin Klein may still "lead" the fashion industry, but NONE of them have the credentials to "lead" young boys to become "men."
Since when should the rest of us lie down and allow the moral relativists hijack and redefine even the word "leader" for the rest of us?
WE will still stand by OUR definition of "leadership," and follow our own criteria for "morally straight" -- despite gay hate-mongering hypocrites who would enforce their militant behavioral fascism upon ALL of us IF they could.
36 posted on
07/21/2003 9:16:21 AM PDT by
F16Fighter
(Ann Coulter for Attorney General... Joe Scarborough for VP...Tom Tancredo as Homeland Security Chief)
To: Recourse
"Morally straight means doing what is right, and what is right is clearly not to peddle hate," he said. This despicably Orwellian comment is typical of liberal non-thinkers.
The utterer of this nonsense apparently feels that complete lack of judgement about Scout leaders is "right". I guess it's "right" for bestiophiles to teach animal husbandry merit badge courses. Perhaps they could demonstrate for the entire troop. It's apparently also "right" for atheists to teach on spiritual matters. After all, one can't discriminate, now can one?
The dickwad also clearly says that not embracing avowed homosexuals into Scouting is "hate". The pinhead has redefined a simple choice not to associate into an active hatred. But hey, being liberal is about not telling the truth - "it all depends on what is is."
37 posted on
07/21/2003 9:20:05 AM PDT by
jimt
To: Recourse
"We said we would not consider (sexual orientation) as reason to exclude someone,"Those oriented towards relatives, animals and children too or just thier pet perversion? I'm betting they're hypocrites.
To: Recourse
The B.S.A. chiefs should find out who the renegades are, and get rid of them immediately. This is absolutely horrible - if these s.o.b.'s don't like the B.S.A. policy, then they should either get elected to management themselves and overturn the policy, or just leave the organization altogether. Pederasts are rampant in our society, and they need to be kept away from our kids, whether they be priests or scoutmasters. Anyone supporting putting our kids in potential danger (while sodomites may not be the vast majority of pedophiles, they are the vast majority of pederasts) should be expelled.
42 posted on
07/21/2003 10:09:14 AM PDT by
GreatOne
(You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
To: Recourse
Boy Scout's national policy that bans gay Scouts That is an outright lie. Boy Scout national policy is that if a person is gay and they keep it to themself there is no conflict. If the person goes public with their gayness then they cannot be part of the Scout program.
51 posted on
07/21/2003 11:42:10 AM PDT by
Flint
To: All
This kind of thing makes me so angry, can hardly type. I have a boy in Cub Scouts, and two more ready to follow right behind him, and Im very involved in a local Boy Scout troupe. (Going scuba diving with them this week. How cool is that?)
Many have already posted most of my thoughts better than I could right now.
If you dont support the BSAs policies, leave and form your own organization that promotes boys and fagot leaders spending quality time together. You could call it Rump Rangers. Lets see how many parents line up to let you sent their boys into the woods with a fudge packer leader for a week.
My wife was going be a Girl Scout leader, but after learning that they allow gay leaders, and that the Girl Scouts pushes a liberal feminist girl power agenda, she would have nothing to do with it.
Likewise, if the BSA ever changes its policy on gays, my boy and I would leave post haste!
I just love this We like the values the Boy Scouts teach, but we dont agree with excluding gay leaders. Thats part of their values, moron. Its what makes them who they are. If they compromise on those beliefs what are they? If theyre willing to compromise on fag leaders, whos to say that they wont compromise on another core value that you agree with. Then its just another PC group that lets its policies change with the winds of public opinion.
The very reason they have other admirable values is because they resist changing to fit the latest fads. If that happens the BSA will cease to exist, (which is what they want) and you could send your boy to the local playground and get the same values education theyd get from what would be left of the BSA.
These leaches want all the benefits of belonging to the scout, but dont want to uphold the standards. Probably the same type of people who remove duty to God from the oath so as not to offend anyone. National needs to find them and toss them out, before the rot the organization for the inside.
55 posted on
07/21/2003 12:53:52 PM PDT by
Jotmo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson