Calif. Senate OKs transgender protections (Companies MUST hire transgenders)

Yahoo ^ | July 25, 2003 | Ellen Maremont Silver

[nwrep]

Calif. Senate OKs transgender protections

Fri Jul 25, 8:11 PM ET

Add Community - Planet Out to My Yahoo!

Ellen Maremont Silver, Gay.com / PlanetOut.com Network

SUMMARY: The California Senate passed a groundbreaking bill on Thursday that makes it illegal to discriminate against transgender people in housing and employment.

The California Senate passed a groundbreaking bill on Thursday that makes it illegal to discriminate against transgender people in housing and employment. AB 196 adds "gender identity or expression" to sex and other characteristics that are already protected by the state's Fair Employment and Housing Act.

The bill, passed by the Assembly in April by a 41-34 vote, now goes to Gov. Gray Davis (news - web sites), who is expected to make a decision in approximately two weeks. The Senate vote was 23-11 along strict party lines: All in favor were Democrats, all opposed were Republicans.

Assemblyman Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, authored the bill. Equality California, the state's GLBT advocacy organization, worked closely with the five-member legislative GLBT caucus to achieve passage of the bill.

Sen. Sheila Kuehl, D-Santa Monica, one of the bill's co-authors and a caucus member, called AB 196 "a simple matter of civil rights. California law already protects against hate crimes based on gender stereotyping, and protects students and teachers from discrimination or harassment on this basis. ... We should not tolerate such arbitrary discrimination that can lead to the problems of unemployment and homelessness among those who are perceived as different."

The San Francisco Department of Public Health (news - web sites) reported 70 percent unemployment among transgender people in 1999, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

AB 196 allows employees to dress consistent with their gender identity as long as they meet reasonable workplace appearance standards. It is endorsed by more than 50 business, religious and civil rights organizations, from the California Labor Federation to the California Apartment Association. As expected, conservatives have criticized the measure.

If Davis signs the bill into law, California will join Minnesota, New Mexico and Rhode Island in explicitly prohibiting gender identity-based discrimination. Connecticut, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and the District of Columbia have statutes that have been interpreted to protect transgender people in certain circumstances. No federal law protects GLBT individuals in the workplace, but activists and organizations including the Human Rights Campaign are developing one.

---

[PFKEY]

I don't disagree that we are in a death-spiral.

The problem I have is how do we go about getting ourselves, our country moving in a better direction?

The only answers I have come up with to this question are..

1.)Vote
2.)Lead by example

Do you have answers that you would have me consider?

[DoughtyOne]

I'll try to add to your list later. I've got to go out now. Take care.

[Lijahsbubbe]

I don't know, but if you can't beat 'em, might as well exploit 'em. I'm gonna open a clothing store called OOPS SHE DAISY!

[dstarr]

When my husband and I were out in California in May, I noticed that one of the rest stops along the freeway had three restrooms: male, female and unisex. Needless to say, we didn't go back to the unisex one.

[USMMA_83]

So help me God, I will never, ever visit California. To hell with them! You know they say, "First California, then the rest of the US." If this is a trend, where the heck do we live with our values intact? This crap is getting out of hand - fast.

[holden]

Can't fire the poor thing after all, "she's" got the 10% co-pay portions of her three reconstructive surgeries left to defray. Of course, we all helped retire the debt on other 90% already.

HF

[PeterPrinciple]

Wonder what angel on my shoulder I owe for keeping me out of this kind of mess?

You raise a good point about unintended consequences. By trying to consolidate their power they may disperse it.

[Smile-n-Win]

What if your religious beliefs won't allow you to endorse this behavior by hiring them at your private business? Doesn't that violate YOUR civil rights???

To answer that question, a liberal would have to know whether you're a Christian or a Muslim.